IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envpol/v7y2006i3p315-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of integrated assessment and scenario development issues beyond SRES

Author

Listed:
  • Shunsuke Mori

Abstract

It is already 4 years since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Emission Scenarios (IPCC-SRES) and the IPCC Third Assessment Report (IPCC-TAR) activities indicated the various future emission pathways as well as the possible societal options. In the first decade of the 21st century, international negotiations on global warming mitigation have not progressed as well as expected. There are several possible reasons for this: (1) there are still many scientific uncertainties about climate change, especially regional change, and the warming may be beneficial to some and not to others; (2) there is insufficient knowledge on the impacts of climate change and the adaptation possibilities; and (3) there are difficulties about the assessments of the mitigation strategies in the long term and the spatial distribution. Although the activities of the IPCC have led to the compilation and proposal of extensive scientific findings, the gap between scientific findings and the political decisions remains deep. On the other hand, most nations agree with the importance of energy and environmental conservation as one of the key factors in sustainability. In this context, research on the long-term assessment of global warming should provide the basis for decision making as the comprehensive scientific information to support the dialogues among policy makers and stake holders. This article discusses two issues regarding scenario developments pending in the IPCC-SRES and IPCC-TAR activities: the role of narrative scenarios for the assessment of societal and economic structures, with introduction to our recent research activities and the effects of long-term uncertainties on short-term decisions. Copyright Springer Japan 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Shunsuke Mori, 2006. "Role of integrated assessment and scenario development issues beyond SRES," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(3), pages 315-330, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envpol:v:7:y:2006:i:3:p:315-330
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03354005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03354005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03354005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lomborg,Bjørn, 2001. "The Skeptical Environmentalist," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521010689, September.
    2. Mori, Shunsuke & Saito, Takahiro, 2004. "Potentials of hydrogen and nuclear towards global warming mitigation--expansion of an integrated assessment model MARIA and simulations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 565-578, July.
    3. Hayashi, Ayami & Tokimatsu, Koji & Yamamoto, Hiromi & Mori, Shunsuke, 2006. "Narrative scenario development based on cross-impact analysis for the evaluation of global-warming mitigation options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(10), pages 1062-1075, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noboru Hidano & Takaaki Kato, 2008. "Determining variability of willingness to pay for Japan’s antiglobal-warming policies: a comparison of contingent valuation surveys," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 9(4), pages 259-281, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shunsuke Mori, 2006. "Role of integrated assessment and scenario development issues beyond SRES," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(3), pages 315-330, September.
    2. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    3. James A. Brander, 2007. "Viewpoint: Sustainability: Malthus revisited?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 1-38, February.
    4. Valerie A. Ramey & Neville Francis, 2009. "A Century of Work and Leisure," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 1(2), pages 189-224, July.
    5. Jennifer Marohasy, 2005. "Australia's Environment Undergoing Renewal, Not Collapse," Energy & Environment, , vol. 16(3-4), pages 457-480, July.
    6. JS Armstrong, 2005. "Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply," General Economics and Teaching 0502049, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Peura, Pekka, 2013. "From Malthus to sustainable energy—Theoretical orientations to reforming the energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 309-327.
    8. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2011. "Green marketing is a sustainable marketing system in the twenty first century," MPRA Paper 50857, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Feb 2012.
    9. Pannell, David J., 2004. "Effectively communicating economics to policy makers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(3), pages 1-21.
    10. Richard Matthew, 2014. "Integrating climate change into peacebuilding," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 83-93, March.
    11. Lorenzo Pellegrini, 2007. "Forum 2007," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 38(6), pages 1245-1254, November.
    12. Edward A. Page, 2007. "Fairness on the Day after Tomorrow: Justice, Reciprocity and Global Climate Change," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 225-242, March.
    13. Arto, Iñaki & Ansuategui Cobo, José Alberto, 2003. "La evolución de la intensidad energética de la industria vasca entre 1982-2001: Un análisis de descomposición," IKERLANAK 2003-07, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.
    14. Kopnina Helen, 2010. "Global Environmental Politics and the Grand Old Theory of ‘Human Nature’," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 14(1), pages 83-105, June.
    15. Gray, Rob, 2010. "Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 47-62, January.
    16. Peter Jacques, 2006. "How should corporations deal with environmental scepticism?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 25-36, February.
    17. Michaël Aklin, 2016. "Re-exploring the Trade and Environment Nexus Through the Diffusion of Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(4), pages 663-682, August.
    18. Mark W. Neff & Zander Albertson, 2020. "Does higher education prepare students to bridge divides in today’s democracy?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 196-204, June.
    19. Van Passel, Steven, 2008. "Assessing farm sustainability with value oriented methods," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44141, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Ming, Tingzhen & de_Richter, Renaud & Liu, Wei & Caillol, Sylvain, 2014. "Fighting global warming by climate engineering: Is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 792-834.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envpol:v:7:y:2006:i:3:p:315-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.