IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v26y2024i3d10.1007_s10668-023-03013-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livestock or crop? Which deserves more investment to reduce greywater footprint emissions and improve water use efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Yuedong Xiao

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Fengtai Zhang

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Ruiqi Su

    (The University of Manchester)

  • Dalai Ma

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Hongbo Liao

    (Chongqing Institute of Quality and Standardization)

  • Xingyu Yang

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Guofang Gong

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

Abstract

There are two distinct directions of agricultural development when considering only crops and livestock. They are integrated crops and livestock systems (ICLS) and separated crops and livestock systems (SCLS). When evaluating agricultural greywater footprint (GWF), nitrogen cycling and nitrogen fixation in ICLS reduce nitrogen emissions always neglected. A novel study that aims to efficiently use water and reduce water pollution in agriculture to guide investment between crops and livestock is appealing. Based on the panel data of 11 provinces in the Yangtze River Economic Zone from 2007 to 2018, we employ the slacks-based model to evaluate agricultural water use efficiency (AWUE). GWF plays an unexpected output in the model. Furthermore, we compare both AWUE and GWF between ICLS and SCLS. The results show: (i) ICLS produce approximately 4.76 million cubic meters GWF less than SCLS, 1.89% of total GWF emission of SCLS. The greywater footprint emissions of the province’s unit-mass meat (GWFM) increased by an average of 26.30%. By contrast, the greywater footprint emissions of unit-mass grains (GWFG) decreased by an average of 27.37%. (ii) ICLS improves the AWUE of the province to the highest level of 10.78% compared with SCLS. (iii) If government allocates capital investment in crops and livestock freely, an additional 1% of crops investment would increase by 1.94% of GWFG while livestock could reduce GWFG by 2.12%. Investment in livestock is valid.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuedong Xiao & Fengtai Zhang & Ruiqi Su & Dalai Ma & Hongbo Liao & Xingyu Yang & Guofang Gong, 2024. "Livestock or crop? Which deserves more investment to reduce greywater footprint emissions and improve water use efficiency?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7409-7435, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03013-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-03013-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-03013-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-03013-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyd, Gale A. & McClelland, John D., 1999. "The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 121-142, September.
    2. Tian, Fei & Zhang, Yu & Lu, Saihong, 2020. "Spatial-temporal dynamics of cropland ecosystem water-use efficiency and the responses to agricultural water management in the Shiyang River Basin, northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. K. Rezaei-Moghaddam & E. Karami, 2008. "A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 407-426, August.
    4. Traore, Seydou & Zhang, Lei & Guven, Aytac & Fipps, Guy, 2020. "Rice yield response forecasting tool (YIELDCAST) for supporting climate change adaptation decision in Sahel," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Katuwal, Krishna B. & Cho, Youngkoo & Singh, Sukhbir & Angadi, Sangamesh V. & Begna, Sultan & Stamm, Michael, 2020. "Soil water extraction pattern and water use efficiency of spring canola under growth-stage-based irrigation management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    6. Chen, Yao, 2005. "Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 545-551, March.
    7. James Levinsohn & Amil Petrin, 2003. "Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 317-341.
    8. Qadir, M. & Boers, Th. M. & Schubert, S. & Ghafoor, A. & Murtaza, G., 2003. "Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: challenges and opportunities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 165-185, October.
    9. Karimov, A. & Molden, D. & Khamzina, T. & Platonov, A. & Ivanov, Yu., 2012. "A water accounting procedure to determine the water savings potential of the Fergana Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 61-72.
    10. Bian, Yiwen & Yan, Shuai & Xu, Hao, 2014. "Efficiency evaluation for regional urban water use and wastewater decontamination systems in China: A DEA approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 15-23.
    11. Philip K. Thornton & Mario Herrero, 2015. "Adapting to climate change in the mixed crop and livestock farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 830-836, September.
    12. Mbava, N. & Mutema, M. & Zengeni, R. & Shimelis, H. & Chaplot, V., 2020. "Factors affecting crop water use efficiency: A worldwide meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    13. Li, Nan & Jiang, Yuqing & Mu, Hailin & Yu, Zhixin, 2018. "Efficiency evaluation and improvement potential for the Chinese agricultural sector at the provincial level based on data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1145-1160.
    14. Zhu, Joe, 2001. "Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 443-455, March.
    15. Liu, Yazhou & Ji, Yueqing & Shao, Shuai & Zhong, Funing & Zhang, Ning & Chen, Yishan, 2017. "Scale of Production, Agglomeration and Agricultural Pollutant Treatment: Evidence From a Survey in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 30-45.
    16. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Fengtai & Xiao, Yuedong & Gao, Lei & Ma, Dalai & Su, Ruiqi & Yang, Qing, 2022. "How agricultural water use efficiency varies in China—A spatial-temporal analysis considering unexpected outputs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    2. Xingle Long & Yusen Luo & Huaping Sun & Gang Tian, 2018. "Fertilizer using intensity and environmental efficiency for China’s agriculture sector from 1997 to 2014," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1573-1591, July.
    3. Ya Chen & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 101-121, July.
    4. Pei Liu & Wei-Chiao Huang & Hao Chen, 2020. "Can the National Green Industrial Policy Improve Production Efficiency of Enterprises?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Shuo Wang & Naixu Tian & Yuqi Dai & Haiyan Duan, 2022. "Measurement of Resource Environmental Performance of Crop Planting Water Consumption Based on Water Footprint and Data Enveloped Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(2), pages 641-658, January.
    6. Tran, Trung Hieu & Mao, Yong & Nathanail, Paul & Siebers, Peer-Olaf & Robinson, Darren, 2019. "Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 156-165.
    7. Avkiran, Necmi K., 2007. "Stability and integrity tests in data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 224-234, September.
    8. Arabi, Behrouz & Munisamy, Susila & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shadman, Foroogh, 2014. "Power industry restructuring and eco-efficiency changes: A new slacks-based model in Malmquist–Luenberger Index measurement," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 132-145.
    9. Wang, John & Yan, Ruiliang & Hollister, Kimberly & Zhu, Dan, 2008. "A historic review of management science research in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 919-932, December.
    10. Haider, Salman & Danish, Mohd Shadab & Sharma, Ruchi, 2019. "Assessing energy efficiency of Indian paper industry and influencing factors: A slack-based firm-level analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 454-464.
    11. Du, Juan & Chen, Chien-Ming & Chen, Yao & Cook, Wade D. & Zhu, Joe, 2012. "Additive super-efficiency in integer-valued data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 186-192.
    12. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Thanassoulis, Emmanuel, 2017. "A DEA-based incentives system for centrally managed multi-unit organisations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 587-598.
    13. Qing Zhao & Chih-Hung Yuan, 2024. "Environmental Protection Tax and China’s Economic Growth: Boost or Slowdown?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Hottenrott, Hanna & Rexhäuser, Sascha, 2012. "Green innovations and organisational change: making better use of environmental technology," CEPR Discussion Papers 9055, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 111-118, November.
    17. Lee, Hsuan-Shih, 2022. "Integrating SBM model and Super-SBM model: a one-model approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min, 2016. "Research fronts in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    19. Hottenrott, Hanna & Rexhäuser, Sascha & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Organisational change and the productivity effects of green technology adoption," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 172-194.
    20. Liu, Yansui & Zou, Lilin & Wang, Yongsheng, 2020. "Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10668-023-03013-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.