IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i10d10.1007_s10668-021-01937-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A survival vulnerability index (SuVI) for an outlawed vocation: empirical evidence from snake charmer community, West Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Somenath Halder

    (Kaliachak College)

Abstract

This study underlines the purpose of developing a vulnerability index to address the issue of outlawed professionals. The Survival Vulnerability Index (SuVI) is a modified form based on two popular indexes, the livelihood vulnerability index (LVI) and the climate vulnerability index (CVI). However, the prime objective is to understand the multidimensional poverty and vulnerability of a vocational group engaged with a risky profession on a regional scale. The snake charmer community, who are coping and struggling with the post-banning situation of Wildlife (Protection) Law, amended in 1972 in West Bengal (India), needs institutional attention. The index is a case study composed of household parameters of all the three dimensions of vulnerability (IPCC 2007), i.e., exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Exposure is defined by the effect of amended environmental laws and the effect of globalization, but sensitivity is defined by ‘health,’ ‘food’ and ‘water’, and adaptive capacity is defined by ‘socio-demographic profile,’ ‘livelihood strategies and skills,’ and ‘social network.’ Hence, after judiciary review and peering of coherent literature, the customized parameters are incorporated. Due to the unavailability of secondary data on snake charmers, firsthand data on desired sub-components are collected through random sampling of 1115 households from 65 villages across the state. The differential vulnerabilities are compared through the composite index and aggregating sampled data. The results show high vulnerability in socio-demographic profile, health, food and water in DHDR, MDR, RPR, and PUR, and the impact of globalization is higher than the impact of laws in PDR, RPR, BTR, and DHDR. It is also observed that the dimension of sensitivity is higher in all the small-scale regions, and which is a severe concern for mitigating the problem. Inter-regional comparison of LVI and CVI approaches both validate each other. This pragmatic SuVI may be used to examine the vulnerability of any outlawed occupational group and or having potential coping and welfare policy or program, where data-scant is a problem and by cross-counting various anticipated baseline scenarios. The outcome precisely points to ardent mitigation and real welfare of snake charmers through redesigned policy and program.

Suggested Citation

  • Somenath Halder, 2022. "A survival vulnerability index (SuVI) for an outlawed vocation: empirical evidence from snake charmer community, West Bengal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 12131-12161, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01937-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01937-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01937-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01937-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tanja Wolf & Wen-Ching Chuang & Glenn McGregor, 2015. "On the Science-Policy Bridge: Do Spatial Heat Vulnerability Assessment Studies Influence Policy?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Kathy V. Tran & Gulrez S. Azhar & Rajesh Nair & Kim Knowlton & Anjali Jaiswal & Perry Sheffield & Dileep Mavalankar & Jeremy Hess, 2013. "A Cross-Sectional, Randomized Cluster Sample Survey of Household Vulnerability to Extreme Heat among Slum Dwellers in Ahmedabad, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-29, June.
    3. Alwang, Jeffrey & Siegel, Paul B. & Jorgensen, Steen L., 2001. "Vulnerability : a view from different disciplines," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 23304, The World Bank.
    4. Alkire, Sabina & Foster, James, 2011. "Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 476-487.
    5. Suman Aryal & Geoff Cockfield & Tek Maraseni, 2014. "Vulnerability of Himalayan transhumant communities to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 193-208, July.
    6. Calvo, Cesar, 2008. "Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty: Peru, 1998-2002," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1011-1020, June.
    7. Rajiv Pandey & ShashidharKumar Jha, 2012. "Climate vulnerability index - measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: a case of rural Lower Himalaya, India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 487-506, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anh Thu Quang Pham & Pundarik Mukhopadhaya & Ha Vu, 2021. "Estimating poverty and vulnerability to monetary and non-monetary poverty: the case of Vietnam," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3125-3177, December.
    2. Montalbano, Pierluigi, 2011. "Trade Openness and Developing Countries' Vulnerability: Concepts, Misconceptions, and Directions for Research," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1489-1502, September.
    3. Anh Thu Quang Pham & Pundarik Mukhopadhaya, 2022. "Multidimensionl Poverty and The Role of Social Capital in Poverty Alleviation Among Ethnic Groups in Rural Vietnam: A Multilevel Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 281-317, January.
    4. Joachim Merz & Tim Rathjen, 2014. "Time And Income Poverty: An Interdependent Multidimensional Poverty Approach With German Time Use Diary Data," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(3), pages 450-479, September.
    5. Jhon Edwar Hernández & Blanca Zuluaga, 2022. "Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty: An Application to Colombian Households," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 345-371, November.
    6. Yuan Li Liu & Kai Zhu & Qi Yao Chen & Jing Li & Jin Cai & Tian He & He Ping Liao, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Farm Households’ Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty in Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Joachim Merz & Tim Rathjen, 2014. "Multidimensional time and income poverty: well-being gap and minimum 2DGAP poverty intensity – German evidence," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(4), pages 555-580, December.
    8. Muhammad Irshad Ahmad & Hengyun Ma, 2020. "Climate Change and Livelihood Vulnerability in Mixed Crop–Livestock Areas: The Case of Province Punjab, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Fatma Aribi & Mongi Sghaier, 2021. "Livelihood vulnerability assessment to climate change and variability: the case of farm households in South-East Tunisia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12631-12658, August.
    10. Andy Sumner & Rich Mallett, 2011. "Snakes and Ladders, Buffers and Passports: Rethinking Poverty, Vulnerability and Wellbeing," Working Papers 83, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    11. Sabina Alkire & Mauricio Apablaza & Satya R. Chakravarty & Gaston Yalonetzky, 2014. "Measuring Chronic Multidimensional Poverty: A Counting Approach," OPHI Working Papers 75, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    12. Andy Sumner & Richard Mallett, 2013. "Capturing Multidimensionality: What does a Human Wellbeing Conceptual Framework Add to the Analysis of Vulnerability?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 671-690, September.
    13. Gallardo, Mauricio, 2022. "Measuring vulnerability to multidimensional poverty with Bayesian network classifiers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 492-512.
    14. Muhammad Masood Azeem & Amin W. Mugera & Steven Schilizzi & Kadambot H. M. Siddique, 2017. "An Assessment of Vulnerability to Poverty in Punjab, Pakistan: Subjective Choices of Poverty Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(1), pages 117-152, October.
    15. Naveen Chandra Joshi & G. S. Rawat, 2021. "An integrated approach for the identification and prioritization of areas based on their livelihood vulnerability index: a case study of agro-pastoral community from Western Indian Himalaya," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 1-36, August.
    16. Khaled Nasri & Besma Belhadj, 2018. "Measuring Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty in Tunisia: Dual cut-off method and Fuzzy Sets approach," Working Papers 1262, Economic Research Forum, revised 03 Dec 2018.
    17. Dehury, Bidyadhar & Mohanty, Sanjay K., 2015. "Regional estimates of multidimensional poverty in India," Economics Discussion Papers 2015-34, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Mauricio Gallardo, 2020. "Measuring Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 67-103, February.
    19. Nguyen Bang Nong, 2021. "Understanding Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Change: Evidence from Quang Ninh Province, Vietnam," GATR Journals jber207, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    20. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:10:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01937-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.