IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i4d10.1007_s12525-020-00419-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cloud computing ecosystem model: evaluation and role clusters

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Floerecke

    (University of Passau)

  • Franz Lehner

    (University of Passau)

  • Sebastian Schweikl

    (University of Passau)

Abstract

Several significantly different attempts have been undertaken to visualize the complex and opaque cloud computing ecosystem by a descriptive model. Recently, scholars have developed a new role-based cloud ecosystem model (Passau Cloud Computing Ecosystem Model (PaCE model)) based on a systematic analysis and synthesis of the previous models. However, its scientific evaluation is still outstanding. The main goal is therefore to conduct an evaluation regarding its structural equivalence and completeness compared to the real cloud business according to the design science research paradigm. The second goal is to demonstrate the model’s usefulness by using it as an instrument for the identification of role clusters, which are frequently covered by organizations. To this end, a cross-sectional analysis is conducted, in which 758 organizations are manually analysed and matched with the model’s current roles. As a result, roles have been newly added, removed, broken down into sub-roles, abstracted to a meta-role and renamed. The cluster analysis unveiled five role clusters. Whereas some roles were predominantly found as single role, further roles were exclusively or very frequently found in combination with others. Overall, the revised model creates, compared to the common rather technically orientated market overviews by market research institutes, a detailed categorization schema helping to understand and investigate the organizations belonging to the cloud ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Floerecke & Franz Lehner & Sebastian Schweikl, 2021. "Cloud computing ecosystem model: evaluation and role clusters," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 923-943, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00419-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00419-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-020-00419-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-020-00419-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Trenz & Jan Huntgeburth & Daniel Veit, 2019. "How to Succeed with Cloud Services?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(2), pages 181-194, April.
    2. Kati Järvi & Samuli Kortelainen, 2017. "Taking stock of empirical research on business ecosystems: a literature review," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 215-228.
    3. Marko Sarstedt & Erik Mooi, 2019. "A Concise Guide to Market Research," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 3, number 978-3-662-56707-4, August.
    4. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    5. Alexander Herzfeldt & Sebastian Floerecke & Christoph Ertl & Helmut Krcmar, 2019. "Examining the Antecedents of Cloud Service Profitability," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 9(4), pages 37-65, October.
    6. Senyo, Prince Kwame & Addae, Erasmus & Boateng, Richard, 2018. "Cloud computing research: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods and future research directions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-139.
    7. Marcel Papert & Alexander Pflaum, 2017. "Development of an Ecosystem Model for the Realization of Internet of Things (IoT) Services in Supply Chain Management," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(2), pages 175-189, May.
    8. Roson Roberto, 2005. "Two-Sided Markets: A Tentative Survey," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on platform complexity," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 737-742, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Jing Chen, 2017. "Exploring Performance Determinants of China’s Cable Operators and OTT Service Providers in the Era of Digital Convergence—From the Perspective of an Industry Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Kazantsev, Nikolai & Petrovskyi, Oleksii & Müller, Julian M., 2023. "From supply chains towards manufacturing ecosystems: A system dynamics model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Robertson, Jeandri & Caruana, Albert & Ferreira, Caitlin, 2023. "Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    4. Delin Zeng & Jingbo Hu & Taohua Ouyang, 2017. "Managing Innovation Paradox in the Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Ambidextrous Capability in a Focal Firm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    6. Elizabeth J. Altman & Frank Nagle & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Innovating Without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-043, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    7. Wang, Siqi & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Leong, Yee Choy & Choo, Wei Chong, 2022. "Thanks COVID-19, I'll reconsider my purchase: Can fear appeal reduce online shopping cart abandonment?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Siripitakchai, Naparat & Miyazaki, Kumiko & Ho, Jonathan C., 2015. "Partnership ecosystem of IC design service companies: The case of Taiwan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 199-208.
    9. Suzanne G. Tilleman & Michael V. Russo & Andrew J. Nelson, 2020. "Institutional Logics and Technology Development: Evidence from the Wind and Solar Energy Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 649-670, May.
    10. Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas & Aleksandr Ostapenko, 2016. "Return, reliability and risk as a proactive set of concepts in developing an efficient integration strategy of companies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-214, April.
    11. Christopher S. Hayter, 2016. "A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 633-656, October.
    12. Baik, Kibok & Kim, Kyoung Yong & Patel, Pankaj C., 2019. "The internal ecosystem of high performance work system and employee service-providing capability: A contingency approach for servitizing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 402-410.
    13. Gibson, Elizabeth & Daim, Tugrul U. & Dabic, Marina, 2019. "Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 181-202.
    14. Sarker, Moniruzzaman & Mohd-Any, Amrul Asraf & Kamarulzaman, Yusniza, 2021. "Validating a consumer-based service brand equity (CBSBE) model in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Yapeng Ou, 2023. "Cities in Transition and Urban Innovation Ecosystems: Place and Innovation Dynamics in the Case of Boston and Cambridge (USA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    16. Hao, Bin & Feng, Yanan, 2018. "Leveraging learning forces in asymmetric alliances: Small firms’ perceived power imbalance in driving exploration and exploitation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 27-39.
    17. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    18. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Takey, Silvia Mayumi & Carvalho, Marly M., 2016. "Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: A conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 97-109.
    20. Samuel Rutz, 2010. "Interchange Fees as a Mechanism to Raise Rivals' Costs - Some Evidence from Switzerland," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 146(II), pages 507-532, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00419-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.