IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elcore/v24y2024i1d10.1007_s10660-022-09553-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge acquisition model of mobile payment based on automatic summary technology

Author

Listed:
  • Huosong Xia

    (Wuhan Textile University
    Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities of Hubei Province)

  • Jing Liu

    (Wuhan Textile University)

  • Justin Zuopeng Zhang

    (University of North Florida)

  • Lakshmi Goel

    (University of North Florida)

  • Yuan Wang

    (Wuhan Textile University)

Abstract

The risks in mobile payment under Fintech have become an urgent problem to be addressed. This paper develops a research framework of knowledge acquisition and explores how automatic summarization technology helps extract knowledge of mobile payment to help managers and users reduce the financial risks. Specifically, we construct the mobile payment domain thesaurus and propose an automatic summary extraction model that integrates Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Attention Mechanism, and Reinforcement Learning (RL). The model is then used to extract the summary of mobile payment policy documents for knowledge acquisition. Our proposed model performs better than other basic models in Rouge-2, Rouge-4, and Rouge-SU4 indexes. Our study enriches relevant research in the existing literature, facilitates knowledge acquisition in mobile payment, and helps mobile users and managers reduce financial risks in their operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Huosong Xia & Jing Liu & Justin Zuopeng Zhang & Lakshmi Goel & Yuan Wang, 2024. "Knowledge acquisition model of mobile payment based on automatic summary technology," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 131-154, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09553-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10660-022-09553-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10660-022-09553-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10660-022-09553-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Insung Son & Sihyun Kim, 2018. "Mobile Payment Service and the Firm Value: Focusing on both Up- and Down-Stream Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu & Liu, Na & Shi, Xiutian, 2020. "Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1031-1042.
    3. Mousa Albashrawi & Luvai Motiwalla, 2019. "Privacy and Personalization in Continued Usage Intention of Mobile Banking: An Integrative Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1031-1043, October.
    4. Sheng, Tianxiang, 2021. "The effect of fintech on banks’ credit provision to SMEs: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Gertler, Mark & Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro & Queralto, Albert, 2012. "Financial crises, bank risk exposure and government financial policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(S), pages 17-34.
    6. Christian Haddad & Lars Hornuf, 2019. "The emergence of the global fintech market: economic and technological determinants," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 81-105, June.
    7. Emily Jones & Peter Knaack, 2019. "Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(2), pages 193-206, May.
    8. Daniel Ellsberg, 1961. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 75(4), pages 643-669.
    9. Oriol Vinyals & Igor Babuschkin & Wojciech M. Czarnecki & Michaël Mathieu & Andrew Dudzik & Junyoung Chung & David H. Choi & Richard Powell & Timo Ewalds & Petko Georgiev & Junhyuk Oh & Dan Horgan & M, 2019. "Grandmaster level in StarCraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7782), pages 350-354, November.
    10. Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos & Punia, Sushil & Schäfers, Andreas & Tsinopoulos, Christos & Vasilakis, Chrysovalantis, 2021. "Forecasting and planning during a pandemic: COVID-19 growth rates, supply chain disruptions, and governmental decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 99-115.
    11. Yao, Yinhong & Li, Jianping & Sun, Xiaolei, 2021. "Measuring the risk of Chinese Fintech industry: evidence from the stock index," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    12. Liu, Jiajia & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2020. "What have we learnt from 10 years of fintech research? a scientometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    14. Hu, Qinghua & Zhang, Rujia & Zhou, Yucan, 2016. "Transfer learning for short-term wind speed prediction with deep neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 83-95.
    15. Kui Du, 2018. "Complacency, capabilities, and institutional pressure: understanding financial institutions’ participation in the nascent mobile payments ecosystem," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 307-319, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choudhary, Priya & Thenmozhi, M., 2024. "Fintech and financial sector: ADO analysis and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Bahati Sanga & Meshach Aziakpono, 2022. "The impact of technological innovations on financial deepening: Implications for SME financing in Africa," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 34(4), pages 429-442, December.
    3. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Huosong Xia & Jing Liu & Zuopeng Justin Zhang, 2024. "Identifying Fintech risk through machine learning: analyzing the Q&A text of an online loan investment platform," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 579-599, February.
    5. Qihang Xue & Caiquan Bai & Weiwei Xiao, 2022. "Fintech and corporate green technology innovation: Impacts and mechanisms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3898-3914, December.
    6. Francesca Bartolacci & Andrea Cardoni & Piotr Å asak & Wojciech Sadkowski, 2022. "An analytical framework for strategic alliance formation between a cooperative bank and a fintech start-up: An Italian case study," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(4), pages 115-156.
    7. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mojdeh Gerami Amin, 2023. "The transformative potential of banking service domains with the emergence of FinTechs," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 411-447, September.
    8. Sánchez, Marisa A., 2022. "A multi-level perspective on financial technology transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Agata Kliber & Barbara Będowska-Sójka & Aleksandra Rutkowska & Katarzyna Świerczyńska, 2021. "Triggers and Obstacles to the Development of the FinTech Sector in Poland," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Yinhong Yao & Jianping Li, 2022. "Operational risk assessment of third-party payment platforms: a case study of China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Avani Raval & Rajesh Desai, 2024. "Reviews and directions of FinTech research: bibliometric–content analysis approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1115-1134, September.
    12. Kou, Mingting & Yang, Yuanqi & Chen, Kaihua, 2024. "Financial technology research: Past and future trajectories," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 162-181.
    13. Sachin Kumar Sharma & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan & Stan Karanasios, 2024. "Small businesses and FinTech: a systematic review and future directions," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 535-575, March.
    14. Guo, Junyan & Fang, Hanqing & Liu, Xuexin & Wang, Cizhi & Wang, Yuan, 2023. "FinTech and financing constraints of enterprises: Evidence from China," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Barbara Będowska-Sójka & Agata Kliber & Laivi Laidroo, 2023. "Has the pandemic changed the relationships between fintechs and banks?," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(4), pages 15-33.
    16. Zhong, Junying & Chen, Tiao, 2023. "Antecedents of mobile payment loyalty: An extended perspective of perceived value and information system success model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.
    18. Morone, Andrea & Caferra, Rocco, 2024. "The Ambiguity Box: A new tool to generate ambiguity in the lab," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Anne Corcos & François Pannequin & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, 2012. "Aversions to Trust," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 78(3), pages 115-134.
    20. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elcore:v:24:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10660-022-09553-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.