IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v6y2000i2d10.1023_a1009681418003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Approach to a Theory of Coordination. Part I: Design Principles and First Results

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas V. Findler

    (Arizona State University;)

  • Raphael M. Malyankar

    (Arizona State University;)

Abstract

Coordination is understood to consist of a set of mechanisms necessary for the effective operation of Intelligent Agent Societies (IASs). In building such societies, it is important to design and implement coordination in accordance with the known requirements and anticipated working conditions of the IAS in question. Currently, there is little theoretical support that could help in this process. We outline the approach and design principles of our work on automatically generating an empirically-based theory of coordination. We also describe the first set of results obtained, which prove the feasibility of the approach. We are concerned with Distributed Problem Solving (DPS) systems in which all agents share an identical goal structure and fully collaborate, as opposed to Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) in which agents may also compete with one another. Our investigation is based on an easily modifiable and parametrizable generic IAS, the P-system, a metaphorical and abstract version of our earlier work, the Distributed Control of Nationwide Manufacturing Operations. The P-system shares characteristic properties with most, if not all, IASs. It was used for a sequence of rigorously designed experiments in which control variables operated under well-defined conditions and performance measures were observed. We infer, from the statistical analysis of these data, characteristic and important descriptors of the organization and functioning of IASs in general. The resulting relations should produce insight into the fundamental issues of coordination, provide design tools and guidelines for the construction of new IASs, and lend support in trouble-shooting existing ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas V. Findler & Raphael M. Malyankar, 2000. "An Empirical Approach to a Theory of Coordination. Part I: Design Principles and First Results," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 119-144, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:6:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1009681418003
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1009681418003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1009681418003
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1009681418003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Prietula & Kathleen Carley & Les Gasser (ed.), 1998. "Simulating Organizations: Computational Models of Institutions and Groups," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026266108x, December.
    2. Kevin Crowston, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Organizational Dependencies and Coordination Mechanisms," Working Paper Series 174, MIT Center for Coordination Science.
    3. Raphael M. Malyankar & Nicholas V. Findler, 1998. "A Methodology for Modeling Coordination in Intelligent Agent Societies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 317-345, December.
    4. Thomas W. Malone, 1987. "Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(10), pages 1317-1332, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian W. Kulik & Timothy Baker, 2008. "Putting the organization back into computational organization theory: a complex Perrowian model of organizational action," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 84-119, June.
    2. Raphael M. Malyankar & Nicholas V. Findler, 1998. "A Methodology for Modeling Coordination in Intelligent Agent Societies," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 317-345, December.
    3. Barrie R. Nault & Rajeev K. Tyagi, 2001. "Implementable Mechanisms to Coordinate Horizontal Alliances," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 787-799, June.
    4. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "On the Longitudinal Effects of IT Use on Firm-Level Employment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 6-26, March.
    5. Kirn, Stefan, 1995. "Organisational intelligence and distributed AI," Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik 40, University of Münster, Department of Information Systems.
    6. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jae Young Choi, 2012. "The taxonomy of research collaboration in science and technology: evidence from mechanical research through probabilistic clustering analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 719-735, June.
    7. Nagy, A., 2009. "Adoption of interorganizational information systems : The adoption position model," Other publications TiSEM af471297-bf03-43bf-88c1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Nguyen Thi Nha Trang & Thanh-Thuy Nguyen & Hong V. Pham & Thi Thu Anh Cao & Thu Huong Trinh Thi & Javad Shahreki, 2022. "Impacts of Collaborative Partnership on the Performance of Cold Supply Chains of Agriculture and Foods: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Edoardo Mollona & Andrea Marcozzi, 2009. "FirmNet: the scope of firms and the allocation of task in a knowledge-based economy," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 109-126, June.
    10. Margherita, Alessandro & Elia, Gianluca & Klein, Mark, 2021. "Managing the COVID-19 emergency: A coordination framework to enhance response practices and actions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    11. vom Brocke, Jan & Braccini, Alessio Maria & Sonnenberg, Christian & Spagnoletti, Paolo, 2014. "Living IT infrastructures — An ontology-based approach to aligning IT infrastructure capacity and business needs," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 246-274.
    12. Rudolf Vetschera, 2004. "Behavioral uncertainty and investments in cooperative relationships," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 17-27.
    13. Müller, R.A.E., 1999. "Digital vernetzte Unternehmen: Entwicklungstendenzen und ihre Bedeutung für die Agrarökonomie," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 35.
    14. David O'Sullivan & Mordechai Haklay, 2000. "Agent-Based Models and Individualism: Is the World Agent-Based?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1409-1425, August.
    15. Julie Smith David & Yuhchang Hwang & Buck K. W. Pei & J. Hal Reneau, 2002. "The Performance Effects of Congruence Between Product Competitive Strategies and Purchasing Management Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 866-885, July.
    16. Stefan Kirn, 1995. "Cooperative Knowledge Processing: The Key Technology for Future Organizations," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 223-244, December.
    17. da Silveira, Giovani J.C., 2014. "An empirical analysis of manufacturing competitive factors and offshoring," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 163-173.
    18. Yuya Ushida & Kiyohiko Hattori & Keiki Takdama, 2010. "Modeling collective adaptive agent design and its analysis in Barnga game," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 5(2), pages 137-154, December.
    19. Sheen S. Levine & Michael J. Prietula, 2014. "Open Collaboration for Innovation: Principles and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1414-1433, October.
    20. Annika Lorenz & Michael Raven & Knut Blind, 2019. "The role of standardization at the interface of product and process development in biotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1097-1133, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:6:y:2000:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1009681418003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.