IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/comaot/v30y2024i1d10.1007_s10588-023-09377-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How allocation of resources and attention aids in pursuing multiple organizational goals

Author

Listed:
  • Minyoung Choi

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

  • Jae-Suk Yang

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Organizations often pursue multiple goals for survival and competitive advantages. We address strategies for the pursuit and achievement of multiple goals from the perspectives of the allocation of resources and attention. Using a computational simulation model, we examine the impact of resource and attention allocation from the perspective of organizational learning, considering it as a critical series of goal-oriented activities, under the argument that the pursuit of the organizational goal is the process of evaluating, searching, and decision making. Our results yield three main strategies that enhance organizational outcomes: sequential attention to goals with more individuals assigned to each goal, scheduling longer times for the achievement of each goal, and managing allowing the organization to proceed with goal-oriented work quickly while individuals take things slowly within an assigned input time as an effective way of using given time. These strategies are pivotal to the successful pursuit and achievement of multiple goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Minyoung Choi & Jae-Suk Yang, 2024. "How allocation of resources and attention aids in pursuing multiple organizational goals," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 101-125, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09377-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10588-023-09377-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10588-023-09377-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10588-023-09377-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker & Kevin M. Murphy, 1994. "The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge," NBER Chapters, in: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition, pages 299-322, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Vibha Gaba & Henrich R. Greve, 2019. "Safe or Profitable? The Pursuit of Conflicting Goals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 647-667, July.
    3. Bengt Holmstrom, 1982. "Moral Hazard in Teams," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 324-340, Autumn.
    4. J. Marschak, 1955. "Elements for a Theory of Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 127-137, January.
    5. Berglund, M. & Karltun, J., 2007. "Human, technological and organizational aspects influencing the production scheduling process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(1-2), pages 160-174, October.
    6. Andrew Mao & Winter Mason & Siddharth Suri & Duncan J Watts, 2016. "An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    8. Songcui Hu & Richard A. Bettis, 2018. "Multiple Organization Goals with Feedback from Shared Technological Task Environments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 873-889, October.
    9. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel & Bart Clarysse, 2015. "Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprises," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 1006-1016, July.
    10. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal, 2009. "Hoping for A to Z While Rewarding Only A: Complex Organizations and Multiple Goals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 4-21, February.
    11. Chen, Jiaqiong & Askin, Ronald G., 2009. "Project selection, scheduling and resource allocation with time dependent returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 23-34, February.
    12. Daniel A. Levinthal & James G. March, 1993. "The myopia of learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 95-112, December.
    13. Daniel Dauber & Gerhard Fink & Maurice Yolles, 2012. "A Configuration Model of Organizational Culture," SAGE Open, , vol. 2(1), pages 21582440124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel A. Levinthal & Claus Rerup, 2021. "The Plural of Goal: Learning in a World of Ambiguity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 527-543, May.
    2. Tomasz Obloj & Metin Sengul, 2020. "What do multiple objectives really mean for performance? Empirical evidence from the French manufacturing sector," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(13), pages 2518-2547, December.
    3. Wang, Long & Keith Murnighan, J., 2013. "The generalist bias," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 47-61.
    4. Amit Jain & Will Mitchell, 2022. "Specialization as a double‐edged sword: The relationship of scientist specialization with R&D productivity and impact following collaborator change," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 986-1024, May.
    5. Irina Surdu & Henrich R. Greve & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2021. "Back to basics: Behavioral theory and internationalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1047-1068, August.
    6. Hart E. Posen & Dirk Martignoni & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2013. "E Pluribus Unum: Organizational Size and the Efficacy of Learning," DRUID Working Papers 13-09, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    7. Martínez-Noya, Andrea & García-Canal, Esteban, 2021. "Innovation performance feedback and technological alliance portfolio diversity: The moderating role of firms’ R&D intensity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    8. Daehun Chung & Dongyoub Shin, 2021. "When do firms invest in R&D? Two types of performance feedback and organizational search in the Korean shipbuilding industry," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(5), pages 583-617, November.
    9. Oliver Baumann & Nils Stieglitz, 2011. "Motivating Organizational Search," DRUID Working Papers 11-08, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    10. Welton Chang & Pavel Atanasov & Shefali Patil & Barbara A. Mellers & Philip E. Tetlock, 2017. "Accountability and adaptive performance under uncertainty: A long-term view," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(6), pages 610-626, November.
    11. Vibha Gaba & Henrich R. Greve, 2019. "Safe or Profitable? The Pursuit of Conflicting Goals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 647-667, July.
    12. Oliver Baumann, 2015. "Models of complex adaptive systems in strategy and organization research," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 169-183, November.
    13. Luciana D’Adderio, 2014. "The Replication Dilemma Unravelled: How Organizations Enact Multiple Goals in Routine Transfer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1325-1350, October.
    14. Stephan Billinger & Kannan Srikanth & Nils Stieglitz & Terry R. Schumacher, 2021. "Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    15. Inseong Song & Jonghoon Bae, 2016. "Politics, strong institution and competitive advantage: an examination of organizational aspiration for competition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 412-443, December.
    16. Luca Berchicci & Murat Tarakci, 2022. "Aspiration formation and attention rules," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1575-1601, August.
    17. Ruth V. Aguilera & Alfredo De Massis & Riccardo Fini & Silvio Vismara, 2024. "Organizational Goals, Outcomes, and the Assessment of Performance: Reconceptualizing Success in Management Studies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 1-36, January.
    18. Daniel A. Levinthal, 2020. "Learning in context: Grateful reflections on reflections," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1529-1531, December.
    19. Jongseon Lee & Nami Kim, 2023. "Innovation performance feedback and patent acquisition from the market: A behavioral perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3199-3214, September.
    20. Johan Arekrans & Sofia Ritzén & Rafael Laurenti, 2023. "The role of radical innovation in circular strategy deployment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1085-1105, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:comaot:v:30:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10588-023-09377-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.