IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v17y2024i2d10.1007_s12187-023-10093-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are South African children on track for early learning? Findings from the South African Thrive By Five Index 2021 Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Tredoux

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Andrew Dawes

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Frances Mattes

    (University of Cape Town)

  • Jan-Christof Schenk

    (Genesis Analytics)

  • Sonja Giese

    (DataDrive2030)

  • Grace Leach

    (University of Stellenbosch)

  • Servaas van der Berg

    (University of Stellenbosch)

  • Jessica Horler

    (University of Cape Town)

Abstract

We report on a national South African multistage cluster sampling survey of early development in 5,222 children aged 50-59 months enrolled in preschool programmes. Children were assessed on the Early Learning Outcomes Measure (ELOM 4&5), the ELOM Social-Emotional Rating Scale, and linear growth (height-for-age), in the last quarter of 2021. ELOM 4&5 is standardised for South Africa and measures development in five domains: Gross Motor, and Fine Motor Development, Numeracy and Mathematics, Cognition and Executive Functioning, and Literacy and Language skills. Cut scores are used to classify children as On Track, Falling Behind, or Falling Far Behind expected developmental standards. Post-survey weights were computed, permitting us to interpret results as representative of children attending early learning programmes. Only 45.7% of the sample were On Track overall. Apart from Literacy and Language (54.7%), no other domain exceeded 50% On Track. Children who were better off socio-economically achieved higher scores (except for Gross Motor Development). Height-for-age measurements revealed a stunting rate of 5.1%, (>8.8% in one province). A mixed linear model analysis showed that age, sex, quintile, growth status, and socio-emotional score were significant predictors of the total ELOM 4&5 score, with growth status and quintile being stronger predictors. The results indicate concerningly poor preparedness for school. Two further surveys prior to 2030 will be undertaken and used to establish the country’s progress toward meeting Sustainable Development Goal 4.2: “all girls and boys have access to quality early childhood development, care and pre-primary education so that they are ready for primary education”.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Tredoux & Andrew Dawes & Frances Mattes & Jan-Christof Schenk & Sonja Giese & Grace Leach & Servaas van der Berg & Jessica Horler, 2024. "Are South African children on track for early learning? Findings from the South African Thrive By Five Index 2021 Survey," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(2), pages 601-636, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:17:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-023-10093-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-023-10093-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-023-10093-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-023-10093-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:17:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s12187-023-10093-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.