IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/amsrev/v12y2022i1d10.1007_s13162-022-00231-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploration of how boards of directors impact chief marketing officer performance: Insights from the field

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly A. Whitler

    (University of Virginia)

Abstract

Managerial research has suggested that Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) are not living up to expectations. Such studies indicate that a high percentage of CEOs are not very impressed with their CMOs, believe they are disconnected from financial accountability, and in many cases, do not consider them highly effective. Such views may help explain why CMOs have the shortest tenure in the C-suite. Moreover, most CEOs believe that CMOs are to blame for the short tenure. What makes this belief interesting is that upper echelons theory suggests that CMOs should be impacted by those above them—the board of directors and CEO. Strategy is discussed and set at the board level and presumably, board decisions and interactions should impact a CMO’s ability to achieve performance objectives. Yet, there has been no investigation into how the board of directors may impact CMO performance. In this research, I conduct five depth interviews with board members, CMOs, and executive recruiters to explore the issue and generate new insight. The interviews reveal a new theory of CMO performance, one that is contingent on the beliefs and actions of the board. In addition to three key themes and portions of the interview transcripts, this research provides a table summarizing the actions that boards can take to amplify CMO performance by employment stage. As exploratory research, this provides a first step in generating more complete understanding of an important upper echelons issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly A. Whitler, 2022. "An exploration of how boards of directors impact chief marketing officer performance: Insights from the field," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 105-115, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00231-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13162-022-00231-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-022-00231-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13162-022-00231-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard J. Jaworski, 2021. "Netflix: Reinvention across multiple time periods," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(1), pages 180-193, June.
    2. Kimberly A. Whitler & Ben Lee & Ryan Krause & Neil A. Morgan, 2021. "Upper echelons research in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 198-219, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Jaworski, 2022. "Update the Theory + Practice section," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 102-104, June.
    2. Kimberly A. Whitler & Ben Lee & Sarah Young, 2022. "The impact of boards of directors on chief marketing officer performance: Framing and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 116-136, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arunachalam, S. & Ramaswami, Sridhar N. & Patel, Pankaj C. & Chai, Linlin, 2022. "Innovation-based strategic flexibility (ISF): Role of CEO ties with marketing and R&D," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 927-946.
    2. Saeed Janani & Ranjit M. Christopher & Atanas Nik Nikolov & Michael A. Wiles, 2022. "Marketing experience of CEOs and corporate social performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 460-481, May.
    3. Leigh McAlister & Frank Germann & Natalie Chisam & Pete Hayes & Adriana Lynch & Bill Stewart, 2023. "A taxonomy of marketing organizations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 617-635, May.
    4. Ming-Hua Liu & Shaohua Tian & Yang Zhang, 2023. "CEO marital status and corporate tax planning behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1207-1242, November.
    5. Bernard Jaworski, 2022. "Update the Theory + Practice section," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 102-104, June.
    6. Kimberly A. Whitler & Ben Lee & Sarah Young, 2022. "The impact of boards of directors on chief marketing officer performance: Framing and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 12(1), pages 116-136, June.
    7. Hao Huang & Yaping Chang & Liyuan Zhang, 2023. "CEO's marketing experience and firm green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5211-5233, December.
    8. Tuck Siong Chung & Angie Low & Roland T. Rust, 2023. "Executive confidence and myopic marketing management," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1118-1142, September.
    9. Zhang, Wei & Qin, Chu & Zhang, Wenyao, 2023. "Top management team characteristics, technological innovation and firm's greenwashing: Evidence from China's heavy-polluting industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Vaid, Shashank & Ahearne, Michael & Honig, Benson & Krause, Ryan, 2023. "Customer-related executive leadership turnover and firm performance: A dilemma of firm-level human resource contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:12:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-022-00231-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.