IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sng/ejae01/106.html

Population Age Structure Change and Labour Productivity: Evidence From Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Olfa Frini
  • Khoutem Ben Jedidia

Abstract

Relying on a macroeconomic view, this paper investigated the popula- tion ageing effect on the aggregate labour productivity. It examined the effects of the labour force participation rate through three broad age ranges: young adulthood (15-29), prime age (30-49) and old age (50- 64). It computed the labour force participation rate by age considering the working-age of the same age range. Using Tunisian data covering the years 1965-2014, the cointegration method testified for a long-run relationship with a progressive adjustment process towards equilibrium. Unlike the conventional approach outcome, the age-productivity profile in our study did not follow an inverted U-shape. Labour productiv- ity edged down for young workers, rose for the prime age adults, and kept on rising for older people. Accordingly, population ageing did not alter the Tunisian labour market performance. Thus, to achieve better productivity gains and enhance the country’s economic growth, delaying the retirement age beyond 60 was advocated.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:106
DOI: 10.5937/EJAE15-18209
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/files/2019-16-1/population-age-structure-change-and-labour-productivity-evidence-from-tunisia.pdf
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/paper/population-age-structure-change-and-labour-productivity-evidence-from-tunisia
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5937/EJAE15-18209?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sng:ejae01:106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EJAE Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.singidunum.ac.rs/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.