IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v34y2003i2p249-280.html

Validating Simulation-Based Models of Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis J. D. Sandole

Abstract

This article discusses the Genesis of War project, in which the author employed the PRISONERS' DILEMMA SIMULATION (PDS) to generate data on the etiology of violent conflict and war as a basis for developing theory relevant to better understanding and dealing with violent ethnic conflicts occurring in post-cold war Europe (e.g., former Yugoslavia). Given the simulation basis of the intended theory construction, there was a need to validate the simulation-generated data before going forward, made more acute by the observation that very little validation of simulation-based data seems to have been done or reported in the literature. Accordingly, a comprehensive validation of the multivariate findings generated by the use of the PDS is presented: an assessment conducted through comparisons with findings from other studies in terms of (a) direction of relationship, (b) magnitude of relationship, (c) ranking of dependent variables by proportion of variation explained, and (d) ranking of independent variables by proportion of variation explained. Across comparisons, the level of agreement between PDS and corresponding (mostly real-world) findings was not only relatively high but also consistent, basically falling within the range of the 75% norm established by Guetzkow's assessment of his INTER-NATION SIMULATION (INS). Such triangulation of findings reinforces the view that some simulations are appropriate for investigating real-world conflict processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis J. D. Sandole, 2003. "Validating Simulation-Based Models of Conflict," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 249-280, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:2:p:249-280
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878103034002006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878103034002006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878103034002006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cup:apsrev:v:64:y:1970:i:01:p:98-123_12 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:cup:apsrev:v:62:y:1968:i:04:p:1104-1124_22 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. George B. Kleindorfer & Liam O'Neill & Ram Ganeshan, 1998. "Validation in Simulation: Various Positions in the Philosophy of Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1087-1099, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Yinhe Bu & Xingping Zhang, 2021. "On the Way to Integrate Increasing Shares of Variable Renewables in China: Experience from Flexibility Modification and Deep Peak Regulation Ancillary Service Market Based on MILP-UC Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Scott Miles, 2011. "Participatory model assessment of earthquake-induced landslide hazard models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 749-766, March.
    4. Andrew Hale Feinstein & Hugh M. Cannon, 2003. "A Hermeneutical Approach to External Validation of Simulation Models," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 34(2), pages 186-197, June.
    5. Haoran Wang & Bin Hu & Yanting Duan, 2024. "A qualitative simulation checking approach of programmed grounded theory and its application in workers’ involvement: extending Corbin and Struss’ grounded theory checking mechanism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(5), pages 4715-4749, October.
    6. Lund, Henrik & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2012. "The role of Carbon Capture and Storage in a future sustainable energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 469-476.
    7. Aumann, Craig A., 2007. "A methodology for developing simulation models of complex systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 385-396.
    8. Babak Heydari & Michael J. Pennock, 2018. "Guiding the behavior of sociotechnical systems: The role of agent‐based modeling," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 210-226, May.
    9. Singer, Marcos & Donoso, Patricio, 2008. "Empirical validation of an activity-based optimization system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 335-345, May.
    10. Singer, Marcos & Donoso, Patricio, 2011. "Contracting contractors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 338-343, March.
    11. Marczinkowski, Hannah Mareike & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2019. "Evaluation of electricity storage versus thermal storage as part of two different energy planning approaches for the islands Samsø and Orkney," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 505-514.
    12. Johanna Habib & François de Corbière, 2014. "Proposition et illustration d'un design de recherche combinant étude de cas et simulation multi-agents pour explorer les processus émergents en Systèmes d'information," Post-Print hal-01130779, HAL.
    13. Cheung, Sai Hung & Oliver, Todd A. & Prudencio, Ernesto E. & Prudhomme, Serge & Moser, Robert D., 2011. "Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1137-1149.
    14. Uri Wilensky & William Rand, 2007. "Making Models Match: Replicating an Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(4), pages 1-2.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3109 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. David C. Lane & Özge Pala & Yaman Barlas & David C. Lane, 2015. "Validity is a Matter of Confidence—But Not Just in System Dynamics," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 450-458, July.
    17. M Pidd, 2010. "Why modelling and model use matter," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 14-24, January.
    18. Edward Radosiński & Łukasz Radosiński, 2018. "Verification of a model as a scientific tool of operations research – a methodological approach," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 28(3), pages 45-62.
    19. Ibanez, Eduardo & Magee, Timothy & Clement, Mitch & Brinkman, Gregory & Milligan, Michael & Zagona, Edith, 2014. "Enhancing hydropower modeling in variable generation integration studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 518-528.
    20. Robinson, Stewart, 2002. "General concepts of quality for discrete-event simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 103-117, April.
    21. José Manuel Galán & Luis R. Izquierdo & Segismundo S. Izquierdo & José Ignacio Santos & Ricardo del Olmo & Adolfo López-Paredes & Bruce Edmonds, 2009. "Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:34:y:2003:i:2:p:249-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.