IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231200951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Reputation in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Saidatul Rahah Hamidi
  • Maizatul Akmar Ismail
  • Shuhaida Mohamed Shuhidan
  • Shamsiah Abd Kadir

Abstract

Corporate reputation is the most prominent area in corporate studies, which signals the current and future corporate practices to pertinent stakeholders. In Industry 4.0 (I4.0), relying on traditional channels would be deemed unwise as corporate information transmitted through these channels is sluggish compared to the swift processes via social media. The study aims to explore and provide insight into corporate reputation in I4.0 by identifying trends in publication and research productivity. To achieve the study objectives, a systematic literature review (SLR) with a bibliometric analysis of past studies from 2010 to 2022 was performed to identify the emerging themes of corporate reputation in I4.0. Resultantly, an upward trend existed in publications and citations after 2011 when the United States of America (USA) and the Netherlands were demonstrated to be the most productive countries in corporate reputation research. The findings of the bibliometric analysis also postulated that crisis communication, engagement, and credibility, as well as the corporate image, could be emerging areas for further research. As such, this study provides valuable insights for academia and practitioners after discovering several potential themes to be further appraised regarding corporate reputation in I4.0 in future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Saidatul Rahah Hamidi & Maizatul Akmar Ismail & Shuhaida Mohamed Shuhidan & Shamsiah Abd Kadir, 2023. "Corporate Reputation in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200951
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231200951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231200951
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231200951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2020. "Social media-driven antecedents and consequences of employees' awareness of their impact on corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 718-726.
    2. Donthu, Naveen & Kumar, Satish & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Pandey, Nitesh & Lim, Weng Marc, 2021. "How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 285-296.
    3. Fatih Özcan & Meral Elçi, 2020. "Employees’ Perception of CSR Affecting Employer Brand, Brand Image, and Corporate Reputation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    4. Baker, H. Kent & Kumar, Satish & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2021. "Twenty-five years of the Journal of Corporate Finance: A scientometric analysis," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    6. Peter Kien Pham & Jo-Ann Suchard & Jason Zein, 2012. "Corporate Governance and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from Australian Companies," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 24(3), pages 84-93, September.
    7. Salman Khan & Jacques Digout, 2018. "The Corporate Reputation Reporting Framework (CRRF)," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 22-36, February.
    8. Jörn H. Block & Christian Fisch, 2020. "Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 307-312, August.
    9. Andrea Caputo & Mariya Kargina, 2022. "A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 82-88, March.
    10. Ramos, Célia M.Q. & Casado-Molina, Ana-María, 2021. "Online corporate reputation: A panel data approach and a reputation index proposal applied to the banking sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 121-130.
    11. Joonas Rokka & Katariina Karlsson & Janne Tienari, 2014. "Balancing acts: Managing employees and reputation in social media," Post-Print hal-01064176, HAL.
    12. Luis Manuel Cerdá Suárez & Jesús Perán López & Belén Cambronero Saiz, 2020. "The Influence of Heuristic judgments in Social Media on Corporate Reputation: A Study in Spanish Leader Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Sylvaine Castellano & Insaf Khelladi, 2016. "Reputation, Image, and Social Media as Determinants of e-Reputation: The Case of Digital Natives and Luxury Brands," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 48-64, October.
    14. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    15. Rojas-de-Gracia, María-Mercedes & Casado-Molina, Ana-María & Alarcón-Urbistondo, Pilar, 2021. "Relationship between reputational aspects of companies and their share price in the online environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Grover, Purva & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Ilavarasan, P. Vigneswara, 2019. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on reputation—Insights from tweets on sustainable development goals by CEOs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 39-52.
    17. Confente, Ilenia & Siciliano, Giorgia Giusi & Gaudenzi, Barbara & Eickhoff, Matthias, 2019. "Effects of data breaches from user-generated content: A corporate reputation analysis," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 492-504.
    18. Joonas Rokka & Katariina Karlsson & Janne Tienari, 2014. "Balancing acts : Managing employees and reputation in social media," Post-Print hal-02313354, HAL.
    19. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    20. Floreddu, Paola Barbara & Cabiddu, Francesca & Evaristo, Roberto, 2014. "Inside your social media ring: How to optimize online corporate reputation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 737-745.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ngoc Khuong Mai & Khoa Truong An Nguyen & Thanh Tung Do & Long Nhat Phan, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy Practices, Employee Commitment, Reputation as Sources of Competitive Advantage," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Berlepsch & Fred Lemke & Matthew Gorton, 2024. "The Importance of Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review, Bibliometric Mapping, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 9-34, January.
    2. Hull, Simon Antony, 2024. "All for one and one for all? Exploring the nexus of land administration, land management and land governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Dušan Nikolić & Dragan Ivanović & Lidija Ivanović, 2024. "An open-source tool for merging data from multiple citation databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4573-4595, July.
    4. Manuel Kaiser & Andreas Kuckertz, 2024. "Bibliometrically mapping the research field of entrepreneurial communication: where we stand and where we need to go," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2087-2120, December.
    5. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    6. Lin, Xiaolin & Li, Yibai & Wang, Xuequn, 2017. "Social commerce research: Definition, research themes and the trends," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 190-201.
    7. Dag Yngve Dahle, 2024. "Trust and Shout: The Reputation/Voice Tension in Schools and Hospitals," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 52-69, February.
    8. Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2024. "How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Oğuzhan Öztürk & Rıdvan Kocaman & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2024. "How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3333-3361, November.
    10. Md Rezaul Haque & Manjit Kour, 2024. "Exploring the Growth and Future Research Direction of Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy in Entrepreneurial Intention Research: a Bibliometric Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12392-12421, September.
    11. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    12. Gour Gobinda Goswami & Tahmid Labib, 2022. "Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Das, Kallol & Patel, Jayesh D. & Sharma, Anuj & Shukla, Yupal, 2023. "Creativity in marketing: Examining the intellectual structure using scientometric analysis and topic modeling," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    15. Lanzalonga Federico & Chmet Federico & Petrolo Basilio & Brescia Valerio, 2023. "Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 41-65, March.
    16. Hutchinson, Mark C. & Lucey, Brian, 2024. "A bibliometric and systemic literature review of biodiversity finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Ballouk, Hossein & Ben Jabeur, Sami & Challita, Sandra & Chen, Chaomei, 2024. "Financial stability: A scientometric analysis and research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    18. Mahamudul Hasan & Md. Maqbul Hossain, 2021. "Corporate Recognition Award and Reputation Dimensions on Corporate Reputation Consequences: A Critical Review on Bangladesh," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 191-204, July.
    19. Horobet, Alexandra & Boubaker, Sabri & Belascu, Lucian & Negreanu, Cristina Carmencita & Dinca, Zeno, 2024. "Technology-driven advancements: Mapping the landscape of algorithmic trading literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Dennis Opoku Boadu & Justice Kwame Appati & Joseph Agyapong Mensah, 2024. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Graph-based Computational Models in COVID-19 Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1-41, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231200951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.