IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i3p21582440231199575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of SNS Characteristics for Dining Out on Customer Satisfaction and Online Word of Mouth

Author

Listed:
  • Choo Yeon Kim
  • Seong Soo Cha

Abstract

This study aims to determine how the quality characteristics of a restaurant SNS (social network service), which is rapidly growing, affect user satisfaction and how user satisfaction affects intention to visit and word of mouth. A total of 305 people responded to the survey conducted from May 9, 2021 to August 17, 2021. The validity and reliability of variables were verified. Moreover, confirmatory factor analysis and discriminant validity analysis were performed through structural equation modeling, and hypotheses were verified through path analysis. The analysis results were as follows. Among the quality characteristics of dining out SNS, reliability, playfulness, convenience, and customization were analyzed to have a statistically significant positive effect on customer satisfaction. However, interactivity does not have a significant effect. Moreover, customer satisfaction has a positive impact on the intention to visit and word-of-mouth intention, and intention to visit also has a positive effect on word-of-mouth intention. Restaurant companies should supplement their SNS marketing strategies, considering the critical factors when consumers use SNS for dining out. This study analyzed the factors that consumers value among the quality characteristics of SNS for dining out and provided meaningful implications. Although most of the previous studies investigated only the effect of the quality characteristics of dining out SNS on satisfaction and revisit intention, this study has originality because it also investigated the word of mouth of customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Choo Yeon Kim & Seong Soo Cha, 2023. "Effect of SNS Characteristics for Dining Out on Customer Satisfaction and Online Word of Mouth," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231199575
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231199575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231199575
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231199575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald P. Ballou & Harold L. Pazer, 1985. "Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 150-162, February.
    2. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    3. Gelb, Betsy D. & Sundaram, Suresh, 2002. "Adapting to "word of mouse"," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 21-25.
    4. Kristine de Valck & Roberts V. Kozinets & Andrea C. Wojnicki & Sarah J.S. Wilner, 2010. "Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities," Post-Print hal-00458424, HAL.
    5. Brown, Jacqueline Johnson & Reingen, Peter H, 1987. "Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(3), pages 350-362, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Khodayari, Maryam, 2022. "Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 663-689.
    2. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    3. Yadav, Manjit S. & de Valck, Kristine & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Hoffman, Donna L. & Spann, Martin, 2013. "Social Commerce: A Contingency Framework for Assessing Marketing Potential," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 311-323.
    4. Sebastian Schneider, 2022. "Price-related consumer discussions in China and the United States: a cross-cultural study investigating price perceptions and word-of-mouth transmission," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 274-290, June.
    5. Wang, Kai-Yu & Ting, I-Hsien & Wu, Hui-Ju, 2013. "Discovering interest groups for marketing in virtual communities: An integrated approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1360-1366.
    6. Maise Soares Pereira & Ivan Lapuente Garrido & Celso Augusto de Matos, 2015. "Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Recommendation: is it Also Worthwhile?," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 12(3), pages 91-118, May.
    7. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    8. Claussen, Jörg & Engelstätter, Benjamin & Ward, Michael R., 2014. "Susceptibility and influence in social media word-of-mouth," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-129, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Wiertz, Caroline, 2017. "Not all digital word of mouth is created equal: Understanding the respective impact of consumer reviews and microblogs on new product success," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 336-354.
    10. Sebastian Schneider & Frank Huber, 2022. "You paid what!? Understanding price-related word-of-mouth and price perception among opinion leaders and innovators," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 64-80, February.
    11. Colleen M. Harmeling & Jordan W. Moffett & Mark J. Arnold & Brad D. Carlson, 2017. "Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 312-335, May.
    12. Pan, Yue & Zhang, Jason Q., 2011. "Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 598-612.
    13. Kim, Taeyong & Hwang, Seungsoo & Kim, Minkyung, 2022. "Text analysis of online customer reviews for products in the FCB quadrants: Procedure, outcomes, and implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 676-689.
    14. Payal S. Kapoor & K.R. Jayasimha & Ashish Sadh, 2013. "Brand-related, Consumer to Consumer, Communication via Social Media," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 43-59, January.
    15. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    16. Fullerton, Gordon, 2011. "Creating advocates: The roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 92-100.
    17. Martin, William C. & Lueg, Jason E., 2013. "Modeling word-of-mouth usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 801-808.
    18. Baka, Vasiliki, 2016. "The becoming of user-generated reviews: Looking at the past to understand the future of managing reputation in the travel sector," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 148-162.
    19. Carmela Milano, 2015. "Democratization or else vulgarization of cultural capital? The role of social networks in theater’s audience behavior," Working Papers CEB 15-004, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Jennifer K D’Angelo & Kristin Diehl & Lisa A Cavanaugh, 2019. "Lead by Example? Custom-Made Examples Created by Close Others Lead Consumers to Make Dissimilar Choices," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 750-773.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231199575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.