IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v240y2026i1p46-63.html

A novel IPF-AHP-FMEA approach for prioritizing failure modes in the automotive industry

Author

Listed:
  • Danijela Tadić
  • Dragan Marinković
  • Nikola Komatina

Abstract

Determining the priorities of failure modes is a problem tackled in practice through the application of FMEA analysis. This method has particularly found application in the automotive industry, where its use is both conducted and mandated by standard and various procedures. However, numerous drawbacks and limitations of conventional FMEA analysis have been identified in relevant literature, and authors have proposed several ways to overcome them. The approach defined in this paper relies on the application of the Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IPF-AHP) approach and two novel approaches for determining the priorities of failure modes based on Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Numbers (IVPFNs) algebra and a modified Pareto (ABC) approach. The model was tested on real data, namely an FMEA report originating from a first-tier supplier in the automotive supply chain. The results obtained through the proposed approaches were compared with those obtained through traditional FMEA analysis. The comparative analysis showed that the proposed models provide a holistic approach to determining the priorities of failure modes and offer a better way to analyze the considered failure modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Danijela Tadić & Dragan Marinković & Nikola Komatina, 2026. "A novel IPF-AHP-FMEA approach for prioritizing failure modes in the automotive industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(1), pages 46-63, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:1:p:46-63
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251361955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X251361955
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X251361955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    2. Peyman Zandi & Mohammad Rahmani & Mojtaba Khanian & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "Agricultural Risk Management Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Hossein Safari & Zahra Faraji & Setareh Majidian, 2016. "Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 475-486, April.
    4. Yildiz Kose & Hatice Nida Civan & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Emre Cevikcan, 2022. "An Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Integrated Model for Ergonomic Assessment of Setup Process under SMED," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, October.
    5. Yucesan, Melih & Kahraman, Gökhan, 2019. "Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-351.
    6. Ilbahar, Esra & Kahraman, Cengiz & Cebi, Selcuk, 2022. "Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    7. Shouzhen Zeng & Jianping Chen & Xingsen Li, 2016. "A Hybrid Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 403-422, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić & Nikola Komatina & Snežana Nestić, 2025. "Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Integrated with Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods Under Uncertainty: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-38, July.
    2. Özcan Işık & Ahmet Çalık & Mohsin Shabir, 2025. "A Consolidated MCDM Framework for Overall Performance Assessment of Listed Insurance Companies Based on Ranking Strategies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(1), pages 271-312, January.
    3. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    4. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Liu, Xinglei & Liu, Jun & Ren, Kezheng & Liu, Xiaoming & Liu, Jiacheng, 2022. "An integrated fuzzy multi-energy transaction evaluation approach for energy internet markets considering judgement credibility and variable rough precision," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    6. Yucesan, Melih & Kahraman, Gökhan, 2019. "Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-351.
    7. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    8. Kun Chen & Gang Kou & J. Michael Tarn & Yan Song, 2015. "Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 155-175, December.
    9. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    10. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2022. "Sports competitions and the Break-Even rule," Working Papers 22.13, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    12. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    14. Yue Liu & Ethan X. Fang & Junwei Lu, 2023. "Lagrangian Inference for Ranking Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 202-223, January.
    15. Hari Darshan Arora & Anjali Naithani, 2024. "Evaluating performance of novel similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition and medical diagnosis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(7), pages 3485-3494, July.
    16. Mao, Yuanfang & Wen, Yizhang & Chen, Haowen & Liao, Min, 2024. "Tungsten-liquid triboelectric nanogenerator for water-flowing energy harvesting with low-resistance and high-DC density," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    17. Jiabin Liu & Ji Han, 2017. "Does a Certain Rule Exist in the Long-Term Change of a City’s Livability? Evidence from New York, Tokyo, and Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Ping Wang & Jie Wang & Guiwu Wei & Cun Wei, 2019. "Similarity Measures of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets Based on Cosine Function and Their Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Abdelmonaim Okacha & Adil Salhi & Kamal Abdelrahman & Hamid Fattasse & Kamal Lahrichi & Kaoutar Bakhouya & Biraj Kanti Mondal, 2024. "Balancing Environmental and Human Needs: Geographic Information System-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process Land Suitability Planning for Emerging Urban Areas in Bni Bouayach Amid Urban Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:1:p:46-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.