IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i1p63-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritization of critical risk influencing factors in quantitative risk analyses for offshore petroleum installations

Author

Listed:
  • Xingwei Zhen
  • Jan Erik Vinnem

Abstract

Comprehensive and detailed investigations of various major offshore accidents have shown that multifarious risk influencing factors including technical, human, and organizational factors have a significant impact on the nonlinear accident sequences. Parallel efforts are being made to develop quantitative risk analysis models involving risk influencing factors. It is recognized that in order to keep quantitative risk analyses in a manageable size, it is essential to restrict the number of risk influencing factors for each failure event. This article describes an effort to prioritize critical risk influencing factors for offshore maintenance work. A prioritization index integrating the weight and the status of each risk influencing factor is developed to determine the most appropriate prioritization. A hierarchy tree is developed to structure the identified risk influencing factors. The unified fuzzy scoring criterion is established for evaluating the risk influencing factors status. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach stressing the consistency of the fuzzy pairwise comparison is applied to evaluate the priority of each risk influencing factor. A sensitivity study is conducted to investigate the criticality of risk influencing factors. The case study demonstrates that the proposed method can be a practical tool for prioritizing critical risk influencing factors effectively for all failure events in the quantitative risk analysis model. The method can also be useful in handling uncertainties arising in quantitative risk analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingwei Zhen & Jan Erik Vinnem, 2021. "Prioritization of critical risk influencing factors in quantitative risk analyses for offshore petroleum installations," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(1), pages 63-79, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:63-79
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20943365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20943365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20943365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:63-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.