IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i1p63-79.html

Prioritization of critical risk influencing factors in quantitative risk analyses for offshore petroleum installations

Author

Listed:
  • Xingwei Zhen
  • Jan Erik Vinnem

Abstract

Comprehensive and detailed investigations of various major offshore accidents have shown that multifarious risk influencing factors including technical, human, and organizational factors have a significant impact on the nonlinear accident sequences. Parallel efforts are being made to develop quantitative risk analysis models involving risk influencing factors. It is recognized that in order to keep quantitative risk analyses in a manageable size, it is essential to restrict the number of risk influencing factors for each failure event. This article describes an effort to prioritize critical risk influencing factors for offshore maintenance work. A prioritization index integrating the weight and the status of each risk influencing factor is developed to determine the most appropriate prioritization. A hierarchy tree is developed to structure the identified risk influencing factors. The unified fuzzy scoring criterion is established for evaluating the risk influencing factors status. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach stressing the consistency of the fuzzy pairwise comparison is applied to evaluate the priority of each risk influencing factor. A sensitivity study is conducted to investigate the criticality of risk influencing factors. The case study demonstrates that the proposed method can be a practical tool for prioritizing critical risk influencing factors effectively for all failure events in the quantitative risk analysis model. The method can also be useful in handling uncertainties arising in quantitative risk analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingwei Zhen & Jan Erik Vinnem, 2021. "Prioritization of critical risk influencing factors in quantitative risk analyses for offshore petroleum installations," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(1), pages 63-79, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:63-79
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20943365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20943365
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20943365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skogdalen, Jon Espen & Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2011. "Quantitative risk analysis offshore—Human and organizational factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 468-479.
    2. Yucesan, Melih & Kahraman, Gökhan, 2019. "Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: A model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 343-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kasai, Naoya & Matsuhashi, Shigemi & Sekine, Kazuyoshi, 2013. "Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 71-74.
    2. Mao, Yuanfang & Wen, Yizhang & Chen, Haowen & Liao, Min, 2024. "Tungsten-liquid triboelectric nanogenerator for water-flowing energy harvesting with low-resistance and high-DC density," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    3. Xu-Hui Li & Lin Huang & Qiang Li & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pythagorean Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method under Large Group Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Teng, Kuei-Yung & Thekdi, Shital A. & Lambert, James H., 2012. "Identification and evaluation of priorities in the business process of a risk or safety organization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 74-86.
    5. Nitasha Hasteer & Rahul Sindhwani & Abhishek Behl & Akul Varshney & Adityansh Sharma, 2024. "Exploring the inhibitors for competitive AI software development through cloud driven transformation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(1), pages 355-397, November.
    6. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    7. Boyi Xiao & Yun Zeng & Yidong Zou & Wenqing Hu, 2023. "Hydropower Unit State Evaluation Model Based on AHP and Gaussian Threshold Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Mohammad Reza Sharifi & Saeid Akbarifard & Kourosh Qaderi & Mohamad Reza Madadi, 2021. "Developing MSA Algorithm by New Fitness-Distance-Balance Selection Method to Optimize Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs Operation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 385-406, January.
    9. Gressgård, Leif Jarle & Hansen, Kåre, 2015. "Knowledge exchange and learning from failures in distributed environments: The role of contractor relationship management and work characteristics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 167-175.
    10. Jabin J. Deguma & Reylan G. Capuno & Melona C. Deguma & Ramil P. Manguilimotan & Raymond C. Espina & Gengen G. Padillo, 2021. "An Analogical Investigation of the Pythagorean Triangle: From a Mathematical Figure to an Ethical Praxis," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 10, January.
    11. Li, Zhengbing & Feng, Huixia & Liang, Yongtu & Xu, Ning & Nie, Siming & Zhang, Haoran, 2019. "A leakage risk assessment method for hazardous liquid pipeline based on Markov chain Monte Carlo," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    12. Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Ameen Mohammed Salih Ameen & Mohammed Suleman Aldlemy & Mumtaz Ali & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Senlin Zhu & Ahmed Mohammed Sami Al-Janabi & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Tiyasha Tiyasha &, 2020. "State-of-the Art-Powerhouse, Dam Structure, and Turbine Operation and Vibrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-40, February.
    13. Hasan Eroğlu, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for wind power plant location selection based on fuzzy AHP and geographic information systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18278-18310, December.
    14. Taylor, Claire & Øie, Sondre & Gould, Kristian, 2020. "Lessons learned from applying a new HRA method for the petroleum industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Dhruv Pandya & Luca Podofillini & Frank Emert & Antony J Lomax & Vinh N Dang, 2018. "Developing the foundations of a cognition-based human reliability analysis model via mapping task types and performance-influencing factors: Application to radiotherapy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 3-37, February.
    16. Xue Han & Pratibha Rani, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluate the barriers of blockchain technology adoption in sustainable supply chain management in the manufacturing sector using a novel Pythagorean fuzzy-CRITIC-CoCoSo approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 725-742, December.
    17. Aslihan Yildiz & Ertugrul Ayyildiz & Alev Taskin Gumus & Coskun Ozkan, 2020. "A Modified Balanced Scorecard Based Hybrid Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-Topsis Methodology for ATM Site Selection Problem," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 365-384, March.
    18. Danijela Tadić & Dragan Marinković & Nikola Komatina, 2026. "A novel IPF-AHP-FMEA approach for prioritizing failure modes in the automotive industry," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(1), pages 46-63, February.
    19. Paltrinieri, Nicola & Øien, Knut & Cozzani, Valerio, 2012. "Assessment and comparison of two early warning indicator methods in the perspective of prevention of atypical accident scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 21-31.
    20. Elias Carayannis & Pantelis Kostis & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2022. "Balanced-Scorecard-Based Evaluation of Knowledge-Oriented Competencies of Distributed Energy Investments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:63-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.