IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v20y2008i2p203-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Family Affair

Author

Listed:
  • Esther de Ruijter

    (Arbeid Opleidingen Consult, Westermarkt 4a, 5042 MC Tilburg, The Netherlands, e.de.ruijter@aoconsult.nl)

  • Tanja van der Lippe

    (ICS/Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Werner Raub

    (ICS/Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Jeroen Weesie

    (ICS/Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This study focuses on co-working by intimate partners and other family members in entrepreneurs' businesses. We hypothesize that co-working by family is beneficial because it reduces trust problems associated with employment relations. On the other hand, co-working is risky because co-working family members may lose income from, and their investments in, the business in the case of bankruptcy or, specific to co-working partners, in the case of separation. Using data from the survey Households in the Netherlands 1995 ( N = 137 entrepreneurs), we find that more trust problems, indicated by monitoring problems and one-sided dependence, indeed increase co-working by partners and family. Monitoring problems influence co-working by partners, while one-sided dependence influences co-working by family members. We also find that married partners are more likely to co-work than cohabiting partners. Bankruptcy risks are associated with the likelihood of co-working, although the direction of causality remains unclear for the effects of bankruptcy risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther de Ruijter & Tanja van der Lippe & Werner Raub & Jeroen Weesie, 2008. "A Family Affair," Rationality and Society, , vol. 20(2), pages 203-226, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:20:y:2008:i:2:p:203-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rss.sagepub.com/content/20/2/203.abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:20:y:2008:i:2:p:203-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publications). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.