IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v23y2024i2p125-153.html

Enfranchising all subjected: A reconstruction and problematization

Author

Listed:
  • Robert E. Goodin

    (School of Philosophy, 2219Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia)

  • Gustaf Arrhenius

    (7632Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Philosophy, Stockholm University, Sweden)

Abstract

There are two classic principles for deciding who should have a right to vote on the laws, the All Affected Principle and the All Subjected Principle. This article is devoted, firstly, to providing a sympathetic reconstruction of the All Subjected Principle, identifying the most credible account of what it is to be subject to the law. Secondly, it shows that that best account still suffers some serious difficulties, which might best be resolved by treating the All Subjected Principle as a subset of the All Affected Principle with which the All Subjected Principle must in any case be supplemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert E. Goodin & Gustaf Arrhenius, 2024. "Enfranchising all subjected: A reconstruction and problematization," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(2), pages 125-153, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:125-153
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X241232023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X241232023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X241232023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svend Albæk & Christian Schultz, 1997. "One Cow, One Vote?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(4), pages 597-615, December.
    2. Alex Green, 2021. "Three Models of Political Membership: Delineating ‘The People in Question’†," Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 565-583.
    3. Abizadeh, Arash, 2012. "On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 106(4), pages 867-882, November.
    4. repec:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:01:p:40-56_26 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Abraham, Kavi Joseph, 2022. "Midcentury Modern: The Emergence of Stakeholders in Democratic Practice," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 116(2), pages 631-644, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roma, Paolo & Perrone, Giovanni, 2016. "Cooperation among competitors: A comparison of cost-sharing mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 172-182.
    2. Bontems, Philippe & Fulton, Murray, 2009. "Organizational structure, redistribution and the endogeneity of cost: Cooperatives, investor-owned firms and the cost of procurement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 322-343, October.
    3. Agbo, Maxime & Rousselière, Damien & Salanié, Julien, 2015. "Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: A cooperative–non-cooperative game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 56-71.
    4. Olimov, Jafar, 2014. "Cooperatives and the Risk Aversion of Farmers," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170833, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Jokubauskaite, Giedre, 2020. "The concept of affectedness in international development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi & Kate Macdonald, 2017. "The Role of Beneficiaries in Transnational Regulatory Processes," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 36-57, March.
    7. Hart, Oliver & Moore, John, 1998. "Cooperatives vs. outside ownership," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19360, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. repec:hal:journl:halshs-01098762 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Enrique Camacho-Beltrán, 2019. "Legitimate Exclusion of Would-Be Immigrants: A View from Global Ethics and the Ethics of International Relations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Enrique Camacho Beltrán, 2020. "How and When are We Right to Prioritize the Interests of Residents and Citizens?," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 183(1), pages 8-39, March.
    11. Ma, Meilin & Zhu, Heng, 2014. "Decision Making Among Heterogeneous Members: A Study on Economic Efficiency under the Centralized Structure of Chinese Farmer Professional Cooperatives," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 168366, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Maxime Agbo & Damien Rousselière & Julien Salanié, 2013. "A theory of agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling," Post-Print halshs-00949726, HAL.
    13. Birger Wernerfelt, 2007. "Delegation, Committees, and Managers," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 35-51, March.
    14. Bogetoft, Peter, 2021. "How upstream cooperatives limit downstream holdups," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-168.
    15. Kim Burnett & Nathalie Gatti, 2026. "Conserving what? How climate strategies sidelined biodiversity in Biden’s funding for “conservation” programs tied to U.S. agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 43(2), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Liang, Qiao & Hendrikse, George W. J. & Huang, Zuhui, 2010. "Value added and governance structure: Evidence from the pear industry in China's Zhejiang province," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52708, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    17. Wil Martens & Bastiaan Linden & Manuel Wörsdörfer, 2019. "How to Assess the Democratic Qualities of a Multi-stakeholder Initiative from a Habermasian Perspective? Deliberative Democracy and the Equator Principles Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1115-1133, April.
    18. Kyriakos Kyriakopoulos & Matthew Meulenberg & Jerker Nilsson, 2004. "The impact of cooperative structure and firm culture on market orientation and performance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 379-396.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:2:p:125-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.