IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v34y2019i6p607-617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aesthetic-based competences lead to a sustainable learning practice

Author

Listed:
  • Poula Helth

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the article is to explore how aesthetic-based competences are developed in and through leaders’ organisational practice and how these competences may lead to a sustainable learning practice in everyday life in organisations. Design/methodology/approach: The article focuses on how aesthetic-based experiments can change leaders’ organisational practice, when instrumental rationality is transformed into aesthetic rationality. This happens when leaders learn to move the everyday drama, the so-called social drama, into an aesthetic drama in order to transform organisational habits and devastating paradigms. Findings: The study of how leaders learn to transform their practice, based on a study at Copenhagen Business School in the period 2014–2017, documents that leaders can learn aesthetic performance that transforms their organisational practice when the learning processes are integrated into everyday life. Originality/value: The combination of aesthetic performance and learning processes has potential for a lasting and sustainable transformation, when the learning concept is rooted in leaders’ organisational practice as a bodily embedded aesthetic rationality.

Suggested Citation

  • Poula Helth, 2019. "Aesthetic-based competences lead to a sustainable learning practice," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(6), pages 607-617, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:6:p:607-617
    DOI: 10.1177/0269094219882859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269094219882859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0269094219882859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Van Maanen, 2011. "Ethnography as Work: Some Rules of Engagement," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 218-234, January.
    2. Martin Wood, 2005. "The Fallacy of Misplaced Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1101-1121, September.
    3. repec:elg:eechap:15034_7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Steven S. Taylor & Hans Hansen, 2005. "Finding Form: Looking at the Field of Organizational Aesthetics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1211-1231, September.
    5. Elena P. Antonacopoulou, 2001. "The Paradoxical Nature of The Relationship Between Training and Learning," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 327-350, May.
    6. repec:elg:eebook:15034 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Paul Shrivastava & Günter Schumacher & David Wasieleski & Marko Tasic, 2017. "Aesthetic Rationality in Organizations: Toward Developing a Sensibility for Sustainibility," Post-Print hal-01515126, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Laasch & Dirk C. Moosmayer & Elena P. Antonacopoulou, 2023. "The Interdisciplinary Responsible Management Competence Framework: An Integrative Review of Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability Competences," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 733-757, November.
    2. Ivan Bolis & Sandra Naomi Morioka & Wilza Karla dos Santos Leite & Paulo César Zambroni-de-Souza, 2021. "Sustainability Is All about Values: The Challenges of Considering Moral and Benefit Values in Business Model Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    2. Joseph McManus, 2021. "Emotions and Ethical Decision Making at Work: Organizational Norms, Emotional Dogs, and the Rational Tales They Tell Themselves and Others," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 153-168, February.
    3. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    4. Nada Endrissat & Aurélie Leclercq Vandelannoitte, 2021. "From sites to vibes: Technology and the spatial production of coworking spaces," Post-Print hal-03332209, HAL.
    5. Christa Breum Amhøj, 2019. "Sustainability as an ecology of learning, thinking and acting: Using the World Health Organization’s six P’s as an action-research intervention to create public value with multiple bottom lines," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(5), pages 439-455, August.
    6. Michael J. Zyphur & Dean C. Pierides, 2020. "Making Quantitative Research Work: From Positivist Dogma to Actual Social Scientific Inquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 49-62, November.
    7. Carlucci, Daniela & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2018. "The power of the arts in business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 342-347.
    8. Han van der Meer, 2016. "Entrepreneurs, Art and Innovation," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(05), pages 1-9, October.
    9. Rafael Alcadipani, 2020. "Pandemic and macho organizations: Wake‐up call or business as usual?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 734-746, September.
    10. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2014. "If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 713-731, June.
    11. Kim Clark & Yuan Li, 2023. "Organizational Event Stigma: Typology, Processes, and Stickiness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 511-530, September.
    12. Lídia Cunha Soares & Marcelo de Souza Bispo, 2017. "The Learning of Cooking in the Light of the Social Practices and the Organizational Aesthetics," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(2), pages 247-271, March.
    13. John Paul Stephens & Jason Kanov, 2017. "Stories as Artworks: Giving Form to Felt Dignity in Connections at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 235-249, August.
    14. Raelin, Joseph A., 2017. "Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application—An editor’s reflection," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 215-221.
    15. Sastre, Raquel & Yela Aránega, Alba, 2023. "A paradigm change: Aesthetics in the management of organisations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    16. Natalia Vershinina & Allan Discua Cruz, 2021. "Researching migrant entrepreneurship communities: a reflection through collaborative (auto)ethnographies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 507-526, June.
    17. Tripathi, Vinayak R. & Popli, Manish & Gaur, Ajai, 2022. "Spirituality meets science: Impact of founders’ imprint on healthcare practices for marginal communities in India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-323.
    18. Sylvain Luc, 2017. "Le mythe du leadership et les approches fonctionnalistes. Au-delà de l'impératif héroïque," Working Papers hal-01536005, HAL.
    19. Alexis Laszczuk & Lionel Garreau, 2018. "Le Journal de Bord Sibyllique," Post-Print hal-01990906, HAL.
    20. Rashedur Chowdhury, 2023. "Misrepresentation of Marginalized Groups: A Critique of Epistemic Neocolonialism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 553-570, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:34:y:2019:i:6:p:607-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.