Does â€˜Civic Dutyâ€™ â€˜Solveâ€™ The Rational Choice Voter Turnout Puzzle?
Rational choice models of voter turnout try to account for why people vote by including on the â€˜benefitsâ€™ side of the cost-benefit calculus some term representing either the collective benefits of voting or the satisfaction the individual derives from the very act of voting, a strategy subject to a number of telling criticisms. After a background discussion of three competing perspectives on this rational choice strategy, which we term the â€˜accepter,â€™ â€˜yes, butâ€™ and â€˜rejecterâ€™ views, we address the following issues. First, how oneâ€™s view of â€˜rationalityâ€™ affects the appropriateness of including â€˜satisfaction from votingâ€™ and related concepts in the rational choice model. Second, as a formal analytical matter, can a â€˜sense of civic duty to voteâ€™ be comfortably incorporated into the rational choice model of turnout? What other recent related embellishments have been made to that model? Third, even if â€˜civic dutyâ€™ can be formally incorporated, would this defeat the efficacy of the rational choice model? Fourth, why the answer to the previous question might differ for economists versus political scientists. Fifth, what significant issues are raised by expanding the rational choice model to include civic duty? The analytical contribution of this article is showing how â€˜civic dutyâ€™ can be incorporated into the rational choice model; the broader conceptual contribution is to evaluate whether and how that innovation advances our understanding of the efficacy of the rational choice approach for understanding voter turnout.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jothpo:v:22:y:2010:i:3:p:275-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (SAGE Publishing)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.