IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/fbbsrw/v14y2025i2p233-246.html

Navigating the Stars: The Moderating Effect of Social Media Usage on the Admission Intention of B-schools

Author

Listed:
  • Smitha Siji
  • Chandan Parsad

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the influence of social media on the perception and decision-making process of prospective students seeking admission to Business schools (B-schools) in the context of the increasing prevalence of social media in people’s lives. Specifically, it examined the perceived and actual utility of reviews posted on Social Networking Sites (SNSs) and the role of Social Media Usage (SMU) as a moderating factor in shaping admission intentions. Additionally, the impact of ratings and reviews on the overall perception of B-schools was explored. To gather data, a questionnaire was distributed via Google Forms to over 500 second-year post-graduate students studying Business Management in various B-schools. Out of the total responses received (201 usable responses), it was discovered that the respondents’ personal experiences either aligned with the reviews they read before admission or surpassed their expectations. Moreover, ratings and online forums had a positive influence on shaping a favourable perception among potential students, ultimately leading to their decision to enrol in a particular B-school. The study also confirmed the moderating effect of SMU. Admission officers should recognize that user-generated content holds greater trustworthiness among prospective students in comparison to content generated by vendors. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize social media in their strategies. Additionally, there is a need to investigate the usage of SNSs by college admission offices and the impact of social media strategies on students’ admission intentions. Consequently, this study focuses on an underexplored area, shedding light on its significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Smitha Siji & Chandan Parsad, 2025. "Navigating the Stars: The Moderating Effect of Social Media Usage on the Admission Intention of B-schools," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 14(2), pages 233-246, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:233-246
    DOI: 10.1177/23197145231185391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23197145231185391
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23197145231185391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Nick Hajli, 2014. "Social Commerce For Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-24.
    2. Jacobsen, Grant D., 2015. "Consumers, experts, and online product evaluations: Evidence from the brewing industry," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 114-123.
    3. Richard P. Bagozzi & Utpal M. Dholakia, 2006. "Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1099-1115, July.
    4. Cheng, Yi-Hsiu & Ho, Hui-Yi, 2015. "Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 883-887.
    5. Bart de Langhe & Philip M. Fernbach & Donald R. Lichtenstein, 2016. "Navigating by the Stars: Investigating the Actual and Perceived Validity of Online User Ratings," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(6), pages 817-833.
    6. Harrigan, Paul & Evers, Uwana & Miles, Morgan P. & Daly, Tim, 2018. "Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intent," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 388-396.
    7. Sparks, Beverley A. & Browning, Victoria, 2011. "The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1310-1323.
    8. Yeajin Joo & Hwayoon Seok & Yoonjae Nam, 2020. "The Moderating Effect of Social Media Use on Sustainable Rural Tourism: A Theory of Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Abdullah AL-Mutairi & Muna Saeid, 2016. "Factors Affecting Students’ Choice for MBA Program in Kuwait Universities," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 119-119, February.
    10. Hajli, Nick, 2015. "Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 183-191.
    11. Shyam Gopinath & Jacquelyn S. Thomas & Lakshman Krishnamurthi, 2014. "Investigating the Relationship Between the Content of Online Word of Mouth, Advertising, and Brand Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 241-258, March.
    12. Kristine de Valck & Roberts V. Kozinets & Andrea C. Wojnicki & Sarah J.S. Wilner, 2010. "Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities," Post-Print hal-00458424, HAL.
    13. Finn, Adam & Wang, Luming & Frank, Tema, 2009. "Attribute Perceptions, Customer Satisfaction and Intention to Recommend E-Services," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 209-220.
    14. Yuzhuo Cai & Jinyuan Ma & Qiongqiong Chen, 2020. "Higher Education in Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moradi, Masoud & Dass, Mayukh & Kumar, Piyush, 2023. "Differential effects of analytical versus emotional rhetorical style on review helpfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Zhang, Mingyue & Zhao, Haichuan & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2022. "How much is a picture worth? Online review picture background and its impact on purchase intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 134-144.
    3. Pooja Katyal & Reetika Sehgal & Anand Kumar Gupta, 2025. "The impact of online consumer reviews on purchase intentions for electronic products," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(9), pages 3178-3197, September.
    4. Ana Babić Rosario & Kristine Valck & Francesca Sotgiu, 2020. "Conceptualizing the electronic word-of-mouth process: What we know and need to know about eWOM creation, exposure, and evaluation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 422-448, May.
    5. Meek, Stephanie & Wilk, Violetta & Lambert, Claire, 2021. "A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 354-367.
    6. Rishikesh Bhaiswar & N. Meenakshi & Deepak Chawla, 2021. "Evolution of Electronic Word of Mouth: A Systematic Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis of 20 Years (2000–2020)," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(3), pages 215-231, September.
    7. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    8. Sheng, Jie, 2019. "Being Active in Online Communications: Firm Responsiveness and Customer Engagement Behaviour," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-51.
    9. Young Joon Park & Jaewoo Joo & Charin Polpanumas & Yeujun Yoon, 2021. "“Worse Than What I Read?” The External Effect of Review Ratings on the Online Review Generation Process: An Empirical Analysis of Multiple Product Categories Using Amazon.com Review Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Roma, Paolo & Aloini, Davide, 2019. "How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 322-339.
    11. Girardin, Florent & Bezençon, Valéry & Lunardo, Renaud, 2021. "Dealing with poor online ratings in the hospitality service industry: The mitigating power of corporate social responsibility activities," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Marchand, André & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten & Wiertz, Caroline, 2017. "Not all digital word of mouth is created equal: Understanding the respective impact of consumer reviews and microblogs on new product success," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 336-354.
    13. Pyle, Martin A. & Smith, Andrew N. & Chevtchouk, Yanina, 2021. "In eWOM we trust: Using naïve theories to understand consumer trust in a complex eWOM marketspace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 145-158.
    14. Benoit, Sabine & Hogreve, Jens & Sichtmann, Christina & Bilstein, Nicola, 2019. "Professionalism Kills the Trading Star: Explaining Member Participation in Trading Communities," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 3(2), pages 54-65.
    15. Anuja Shukla & Anubhav Mishra, 2023. "Role of Review Length, Review Valence and Review Credibility on Consumer’s Online Hotel Booking Intention," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 403-414, December.
    16. Anuja Shukla & Anubhav Mishra, 2023. "Effects of Visual Information and Argument Concreteness on Purchase Intention of Consumers Towards Online Hotel Booking," Vision, , vol. 27(5), pages 639-649, November.
    17. Kim, Taeyong & Hwang, Seungsoo & Kim, Minkyung, 2022. "Text analysis of online customer reviews for products in the FCB quadrants: Procedure, outcomes, and implications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 676-689.
    18. Minjae Kim & Daniel DellaPosta, 2022. "The Fickle Crowd: Reinforcement and Contradiction of Quality Evaluations in Cultural Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2496-2518, November.
    19. Enrique Bigné & Carla Ruiz & Luisa Andreu & Blanca Hernandez, 2015. "The role of social motivations, ability, and opportunity in online know-how exchanges: evidence from the airline services industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(2), pages 209-232, June.
    20. Sergio M. Fernández-Miguélez & Miguel Díaz-Puche & Juan A. Campos-Soria & Federico Galán-Valdivieso, 2020. "The Impact of Social Media on Restaurant Corporations’ Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:fbbsrw:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:233-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.