IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v18y1994i1p98-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Changes in Science and Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J.W. Tijssen

    (University of Leiden, the Netherlands)

  • Anthony F.J. Van Raan

    (University of Leiden, the Netherlands)

Abstract

This article presents basic principles and examples of spatial representations derived from the analysis of co-occurrence frequency data pertaining to bibliographic information elements, such as key words and citations, in research publications and patents. These bibliometric maps provide a means for communicating information on relational features of the science and technology (S&T) system—either for analytical or representational purposes. Characteristics of the main types ofbibliometric maps are outlined, and their potential for practical applications in S&T policy and research and development management are discussed. An emphasis is placed on more recent developments, in particular bibliometric maps produced by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) for depicting temporal changes in the S&T system. Three empirical examples ofsuch maps are presented with a focus on their application for impact assessment in both scientific as well as technological fields: (1) the emergence of new research topics in worldwide research on manufacturing technology, (2) changes in patterns of (inter)na tional collaboration within Dutch research on coal and coal products, and (3) the role of instruments in materials science.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J.W. Tijssen & Anthony F.J. Van Raan, 1994. "Mapping Changes in Science and Technology," Evaluation Review, , vol. 18(1), pages 98-115, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:1:p:98-115
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9401800110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9401800110
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9401800110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Healey, Peter & Rothman, Harry & Hoch, Paul K., 1986. "An experiment in science mapping for research planning," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 233-251, October.
    2. A F J van Raan & J G M van der Velde, 1991. "Bibliometric mapping and early warning for emerging topics: exploring developments in materials science," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 115-127, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Churkina, Galina, 2008. "Modeling the carbon cycle of urban systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 107-113.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renald K. Buter & Ed C. M. Noyons, 2001. "Improving the functionality of interactive bibliometric science maps," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 51(1), pages 55-68, April.
    2. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Juan C. Infante-Moro & Germán Ruipérez García, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Global Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Deeds, David L. & Decarolis, DONA & Coombs, Joseph, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 211-229, May.
    4. David L. Deeds & Dona Decarolis & Joseph E. Coombs, 1998. "Firm-Specific Resources and Wealth Creation in High-Technology Ventures: Evidence from Newly Public Biotechnology Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(3), pages 55-73, April.
    5. Barbieri, Nicolò & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rizzo, Ugo, 2020. "Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).
    6. Cozzens, Susan E., 1997. "The knowledge pool: Measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 77-89, February.
    7. Yataganbaba, Alptug & Ozkahraman, Bengi & Kurtbas, Irfan, 2017. "Worldwide trends on encapsulation of phase change materials: A bibliometric analysis (1990–2015)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 720-731.
    8. Mario COCCIA, 2018. "Evolution of the economics of science in the Twenty Century," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 65-84, March.
    9. Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon & Sheehan, Tony, 2007. "Making knowledge visible: Using expert yellow pages to map capabilities in professional services firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1603-1619, December.
    10. Mark William Neff & Elizabeth A. Corley, 2009. "35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 657-682, September.
    11. Christian Weismayer & Ilona Pezenka, 2017. "Identifying emerging research fields: a longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1757-1785, December.
    12. Loet Leydesdorff & Ping Zhou, 2007. "Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 70(3), pages 693-713, March.
    13. Frank Havemann & Jochen Gläser & Michael Heinz, 2017. "Memetic search for overlapping topics based on a local evaluation of link communities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 1089-1118, May.
    14. E. C. M. Noyons & H. F. Moed & A. F. J. Raan, 1999. "Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604, November.
    15. Deeds, David L. & Decarolis, Dona & Coombs, Joseph E., 1997. "The impact of firmspecific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offering: Evidence from the biotechnology industry," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 31-46, January.
    16. Si Hyung Joo & Yeonbae Kim, 2010. "Measuring relatedness between technological fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(2), pages 435-454, May.
    17. Thomas Gurney & Edwin Horlings & Peter van den Besselaar, 2012. "Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 435-449, May.
    18. Ed Noyons, 2001. "Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 50(1), pages 83-98, January.
    19. Shuo Xu & Junwan Liu & Dongsheng Zhai & Xin An & Zheng Wang & Hongshen Pang, 2018. "Overlapping thematic structures extraction with mixed-membership stochastic blockmodel," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 61-84, October.
    20. Jochen Gläser & Wolfgang Glänzel & Andrea Scharnhorst, 2017. "Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 981-998, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:18:y:1994:i:1:p:98-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.