IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v52y2025i9p2099-2119.html

Can administrative division adjustment improve urban land use efficiency? Evidence from “Revoke County to Urban District†in China

Author

Listed:
  • Binbin Yu
  • Yajing Hu
  • Xinru Zhou

Abstract

Government-led administrative division adjustment has occurred throughout the various stages of China’s social development and serves as a significant driving force for urbanization in the country. As representative of administrative division adjustment, the Revoke County to Urban District (RCUD) policy has played a crucial role in the urbanization process in China. The question must therefore be asked as to whether RCUD does indeed enhance urban land use efficiency (ULUE). This has significant implications for China’s new-type urbanization strategy and high-quality economic development. This paper constructs a research framework on the relationship between RCUD and ULUE, and empirically examines the effect of RCUD on ULUE using data from Chinese prefecture-level and above cities. The results show that RCUD significantly promotes improvements to ULUE, and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. The policy effect of RCUD exhibits heterogeneity, not only in terms of economic development but also in terms of city size and in terms of RCUD reform experience. The effect improvements to RCUD have on ULUE is more pronounced in economically developed cities. Furthermore, RCUD significantly increases ULUE only in large cities and above; the impact of RCUD is greater in cities with prior experience. Mechanism tests reveal that promoting elements agglomeration and optimizing industrial structure are important channels by which RCUD can enhance ULUE; however, the disorderly expansion of boundaries triggered by RCUD has adverse effects on ULUE. The research findings provide theoretical support and reference for optimizing further RCUD reform and enhancing ULUE.

Suggested Citation

  • Binbin Yu & Yajing Hu & Xinru Zhou, 2025. "Can administrative division adjustment improve urban land use efficiency? Evidence from “Revoke County to Urban District†in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 52(9), pages 2099-2119, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:2099-2119
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083251325638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083251325638
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083251325638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilles Duranton & Diego Puga, 2001. "Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1454-1477, December.
    2. Fan, Shenggen & Li, Lixing & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2012. "Challenges of creating cities in China: Lessons from a short-lived county-to-city upgrading policy," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 476-491.
    3. Liu, Shuchang & Xiao, Wu & Li, Linlin & Ye, Yanmei & Song, Xiaoli, 2020. "Urban land use efficiency and improvement potential in China: A stochastic frontier analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Zhang, Wenxi & Wang, Bo & Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Wei, Yehua Dennis, 2022. "How does industrial agglomeration affect urban land use efficiency? A spatial analysis of Chinese cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Heyman, Fredrik & Sjoholm, Fredrik & Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson, 2007. "Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer-employee data," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 355-376, November.
    6. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    7. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    8. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Reflections on China's food security and land use policy under rapid urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Gao, Xin & Zhang, Anlu & Sun, Zhanli, 2020. "How regional economic integration influence on urban land use efficiency? A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Shiva S. Makki & Agapi Somwaru, 2004. "Impact of Foreign Direct Investment and Trade on Economic Growth: Evidence from Developing Countries," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(3), pages 795-801.
    11. Peneder, Michael, 2003. "Industrial structure and aggregate growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 427-448, December.
    12. Liu, Yuan & Gao, Hong & Cai, Jiming & Lu, Yang & Fan, Zhenyu, 2022. "Urbanization path, housing price and land finance: International experience and China’s facts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan & Lameli, Alfred & Südekum, Jens, 2012. "Dialects, cultural identity, and economic exchange," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 225-239.
    14. Feng, Rundong & Wang, Kaiyong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal effects of administrative division adjustment on urban expansion in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. M. Keith Chen, 2013. "The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 690-731, April.
    16. Li, Pei & Lu, Yi & Wang, Jin, 2016. "Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 18-37.
    17. Yongzheng Liu & Jie Mao, 2019. "How Do Tax Incentives Affect Investment and Productivity? Firm-Level Evidence from China," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 261-291, August.
    18. Yu, Junqing & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2019. "Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Li, Hongbin & Zhou, Li-An, 2005. "Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(9-10), pages 1743-1762, September.
    20. Jia, Junxue & Ding, Siying & Liu, Yongzheng, 2020. "Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    21. Yuting, Yang & Guanghui, Jiang & Qiuyue, Zheng & Dingyang, Zhou & Yuling, Li, 2019. "Does the land use structure change conform to the evolution law of industrial structure? An empirical study of Anhui Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 657-667.
    22. Wei Tang & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings, 2017. "Do city–county mergers in China promote local economic development?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 25(3), pages 439-469, July.
    23. Liu, Jingming & Hou, Xianhui & Wang, Zhanqi & Shen, Yue, 2021. "Study the effect of industrial structure optimization on urban land-use efficiency in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    24. Tang, Chenghui & Qiu, Peng & Dou, Jianmin, 2022. "The impact of borders and distance on knowledge spillovers — Evidence from cross-regional scientific and technological collaboration," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    25. Callaway, Brantly & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C., 2021. "Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 200-230.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lv, Kangjuan & Zheng, Heyun & Ge, Liming, 2024. "Does administrative division adjustment reduce air pollution? Evidence from city-county mergers in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 912-928.
    2. Xinyue Wang & Kegao Yan & Yang Shi & Han Hu & Shanjun Mao, 2025. "The Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Pressure on Urban Land Green Utilization Efficiency—Empirical Research from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Xiao Han & Anlu Zhang & Yinying Cai, 2020. "Spatio-Econometric Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency in China from the Perspective of Natural Resources Input and Undesirable Outputs: A Case Study of 287 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Li, Mingke & Shen, Renjun & Chen, Yanlong & Ji, Tonghui, 2025. "Energy costs of market integration: Evidence from city-county merger in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1766-1786.
    5. Lisha Pan & Hangang Hu & Xin Jing & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yuefei Zhuo & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Impacts of Regional Cooperation on Urban Land-Use Efficiency: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Hao, Jingjun & Dong, Peiting & Yao, Xin, 2025. "High-speed railway opening, firm agglomeration and carbon emission: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Zhi Li & Ruyi Yan & Zuo Zhang & Yue Sun & Xiaogang Zhang, 2021. "The Effects of City-County Mergers on Urban Energy Intensity: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Cai, Guowei & Zhang, Xuejiao & Yang, Hao, 2022. "Fiscal stress and the formation of zombie firms: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    10. Bo, Shiyu & Wang, Yi, 2025. "The labor market outcomes of jurisdictional consolidation: Evidence from city–county mergers in China," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Bo, Shiyu, 2020. "Centralization and regional development: Evidence from a political hierarchy reform to create cities in china," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    12. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Yahong Liu & Hailian Sun & Lei Shi & Huimin Wang & Zhai Xiu & Xiao Qiu & Hong Chang & Yu Xie & Yang Wang & Chengjie Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Land-Use Eco-Efficiency Incorporating Ecosystem Services in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Ma, Hongqi & Qin, Cong & Zou, Jingxian & Zhang, Wei, 2025. "Fiscal decentralization and food production: Evidence from Province-Managing-County reform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    15. Houtian Tang & Yuanlai Wu & Jinxiu Chen & Liuxin Deng & Minjie Zeng, 2022. "How Does Change in Rural Residential Land Affect Cultivated Land Use Efficiency? An Empirical Study Based on 42 Cities in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Kang, Meiling & Deng, Pengkun & Zhao, Zhongkuang, 2025. "Has the county-to-district reform enhanced entrepreneurial activity? Evidence from emerging cities in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PA).
    17. Yue Zhou & Yi Chen & Yi Hu, 2021. "Assessing Efficiency of Urban Land Utilisation under Environmental Constraints in Yangtze River Delta, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Ma, Hongqi & Zou, Jingxian & Cai, Hongbo & Zhang, Li, 2024. "Administrative division adjustment and environmental pollution: Evidence from City-County Mergers in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Yunpeng Zhang & Tong Gao & Yan Sun, 2025. "Exploring the coupling coordination relationship and influencing factors between regional integration and urban land utilization green efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Mengjia Zhen & Junlan Yu & Siyi Chen & Ning Wang & Zhigang Chen, 2023. "Evaluating the Impact of County-to-District Transformation on Urban Residential Land Supply: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Model Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:52:y:2025:i:9:p:2099-2119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.