IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v40y2013i5p923-941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the Optimal Center Location. A Spatial Thinking Based on Robustness, Sensitivity, and Influence Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Josselin

    (UMR ESPACE (6012), Department of Geography, and Laboratoire d'Informatique d'Avignon (LIA), Department of Computer Science, Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, Avignon, France)

  • Marc Ciligot-Travain

    (LANLG, Department of Mathematics, Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, Avignon, France)

Abstract

In this paper we deal with different metrics using L p norms in the 1-facility location problem and their properties. We propose to revisit the problem of optimal center location by discussing the properties of three well-known centers in 2-dimensional space: The 1-median for L 1 , the 1-center (Chebyshev center) for L ∞ and the gravity center for L 2 , respectively, the median, the mean, and the center of extreme values in one dimension. The contribution of the research concerns methods to map influence and sensitivity that provide valuable and complementary information on space for decision making in territorial planning. We also discuss the center properties according to the primary objectives of equity, equality, and efficacy in the access to a facility. In a spatial-thinking approach, we present some methodological propositions to obtain robust and durable centers in geographical space, that rely on the adaptation of the general frame of the L p norm to the planning objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Josselin & Marc Ciligot-Travain, 2013. "Revisiting the Optimal Center Location. A Spatial Thinking Based on Robustness, Sensitivity, and Influence Analysis," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 40(5), pages 923-941, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:923-941
    DOI: 10.1068/b38036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b38036
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b38036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blank, Rebecca M., 2002. "Can equity and efficiency complement each other?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 451-468, September.
    2. Isabelle Thomas, 2002. "Transportation Networks and the Optimal Location of Human Activities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2436.
    3. Martin Gugat & Barbara Pfeiffer, 2007. "Weber problems with mixed distances and regional demand," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 66(3), pages 419-449, December.
    4. Zvi Drezner & George Wesolowsky, 2002. "Sensitivity Analysis to the Value of p of the ℓ p Distance Weber Problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 111(1), pages 135-150, March.
    5. Barbara Anthony & Vineet Goyal & Anupam Gupta & Viswanath Nagarajan, 2010. "A Plant Location Guide for the Unsure: Approximation Algorithms for Min-Max Location Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 79-101, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miren Lafourcade & Jacques-François Thisse, 2011. "New Economic Geography: The Role of Transport Costs," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Sabrina Auci & Laura Castellucci & Manuela Coromaldi, 2021. "How does public spending affect technical efficiency? Some evidence from 15 European countries," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 108-130, January.
    3. Fujita, Masahisa & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2009. "New Economic Geography: An appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 109-119, March.
    4. Alfonso Arpaia & Gilles Mourre, 2012. "Institutions And Performance In European Labour Markets: Taking A Fresh Look At Evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 1-41, February.
    5. Minghui Zhang & Weiqi Xia, 2022. "Research on the Law of China’s Rural Land Institutional Changes: An Analytical Framework of Economic Efficiency and Distributive Equity," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2004. "Agglomeration and economic geography," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 58, pages 2563-2608, Elsevier.
    7. Thisse, Jacques-François & Fujita, Masahisa, 2008. "New Economic Geography: an appraisal on the occasion of Paul Krugman's 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics," CEPR Discussion Papers 7063, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Ryta I. Dziemianowicz & Adam Wyszkowski & Renata Budlewska, 2014. "Tax expenditures jako ukryta forma wydatków publicznych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 35-62.
    9. Koster, Hans & Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2021. "High-speed Rail and the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity: Evidence from Japan's Shinkansen," CEPR Discussion Papers 15771, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Rebecca Blank, 2003. "Selecting Among Anti-Poverty Policies: Can an Economist be Both Critical and Caring?," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(4), pages 447-469.
    11. Jing Yao & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Serving regional demand in facility location," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 643-662, August.
    12. Martin Stadelmann & Åsa Persson & Izabela Ratajczak-Juszko & Axel Michaelowa, 2014. "Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends or foes?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 101-120, May.
    13. Gerdes, Christer, 2015. "Does Performance Information Affect Job Seekers in Selecting Private Providers in Voucher-Based ALMP Programs?," IZA Discussion Papers 8992, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Figari, Francesco, 2011. "From housewives to independent earners: can the tax system help Italian women to work?," ISER Working Paper Series 2011-15, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Stef Proost & Jacques-François Thisse, 2019. "What Can Be Learned from Spatial Economics?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 57(3), pages 575-643, September.
    16. Johannes Idsø & Torbjørn Årethun & Bharat P. Bhatta, 2018. "The Income Equalization System among Municipalities in Norway: Strengths and Implications," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, May.
    17. Pfeifer, Christian, 2004. "Fairness und Kündigungen : eine theoretische und empirische Analyse (Fairness and layoffs * a theoretical and empirical analysis)," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 37(2), pages 127-145.
    18. Nordén, Anna, 2014. "Payment Types and Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Stated Preferences of Landowners," RFF Working Paper Series dp-14-11-efd, Resources for the Future.
    19. Berthold, Norbert & von Berchem, Sascha, 2003. "Die Sozialhilfe zwischen Effizienz und Gerechtigkeit: wie kann der Spagat gelingen?," Discussion Paper Series 62, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    20. César Ducruet & Laurent Beauguitte, 2014. "Spatial Science and Network Science: Review and Outcomes of a Complex Relationship," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 297-316, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:40:y:2013:i:5:p:923-941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.