IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v28y1996i7p1299-1313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competitiveness of Business Services in the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, and the South East of England

Author

Listed:
  • D M W N Hitchens

    (Department of Economics, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland)

  • P N O'Farrell

    (Department of Economics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Scotland)

  • C D Conway

    (Department of Economics, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3HP, England)

Abstract

In this paper we compare the competitiveness and performance of samples of business service offices located in two peripheral regions of the United Kingdom: Northern Ireland and Wales, and peripheral Republic of Ireland by making matched comparisons with counterparts in a core region—South East England. Offices in South East England are characterised by faster growth, higher productivity, wider markets, and greater export penetration than their counterparts in the other regions considered. The relative strengths, weaknesses, and constraints on raising productivity and competitiveness of peripherally located firms are examined. Special consideration is given to markets served, spatial structure of markets, locational constraints, and the adequacy of equipment and qualifications. An important factor influencing competitiveness is the ability of an office to provide high-quality specialist services, and alternative policies for achieving this aim are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • D M W N Hitchens & P N O'Farrell & C D Conway, 1996. "The Competitiveness of Business Services in the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, and the South East of England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(7), pages 1299-1313, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:7:p:1299-1313
    DOI: 10.1068/a281299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a281299
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a281299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward K. Y. Chen, 1979. "The Patterns of Economic growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Hyper-growth in Asian Economies, chapter 3, pages 28-41, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Kravis, Irving B, 1976. "A Survey of International Comparisons of Productivity," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 86(341), pages 1-44, March.
    3. Rory O'Donnell & Siobhan Kenny, 1993. "Ireland's Competitive Advantage: A Review of Some Measures," Papers WP041, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    4. Geroski, P A, 1991. "Innovation and the Sectoral," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(409), pages 1438-1451, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2016. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 3: Zur Standortstruktur von wissensintensiven Unternehmensdiensten – Fakten, Bestimmungsgründe, regionalpo," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59427, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Estanislao, Jesus P. & Adamag, F.E. & Lim, M.T., 1981. "Sources of Philippine Industrial Growth, 1956-1978," Working Papers WP 1981-07, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Arvanitis, Spyros & Hollenstein, Heinz & Stucki, Tobias, 2016. "Does the explanatory power of the OLI approach differ among sectors and business functions? Evidence from firm-level data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-46.
    3. D.M.W.N. Hitchens & P.N. O'Farrell & C.D. Conway, 1996. "The Comparative Performance of Business Services in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1093-1110, August.
    4. Solomou, Solomos & Shimazaki, Masao, 2007. "Japanese episodic long swings in economic growth," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 224-241, April.
    5. Wakelin, Katharine, 2001. "Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1079-1090, August.
    6. Zhang, Qizheng & Qian, Zesen & Wang, Shuo & Yuan, Lingran & Gong, Binlei, 2022. "Productivity drain or productivity gain? The effect of new technology adoption in the oilfield market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Bryan A. Stuart, 2022. "The Long-Run Effects of Recessions on Education and Income," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 42-74, January.
    8. repec:dgr:rugggd:200796 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Fremdling, Rainer & De Jong, Herman & Timmer, Marcel P., 2007. "British and German Manufacturing Productivity Compared: A New Benchmark for 1935/36 Based on Double Deflated Value Added," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(2), pages 350-378, June.
    10. Kneller, Richard & McGowan, Danny & Inui, Tomohiko & Matsuura, Toshiyuki, 2012. "Globalisation, multinationals and productivity in Japan’s lost decade," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 110-128.
    11. Matthew T. Jones & Maurice Obstfeld, 1997. "Saving, Investment, and Gold: A Reassessment of Historical Current Account Data," NBER Working Papers 6103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Robert Inklaar & Marcel P. Timmer, 2014. "The Relative Price of Services," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(4), pages 727-746, December.
    13. Boris Lokshin & René Belderbos & Martin Carree, 2008. "The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(3), pages 399-413, June.
    14. Sicong Li, 2020. "Determinants of Chinese Direct Investment in Central-East Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative Framework: A Panel Data Analysis," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(4), pages 62-81, October.
    15. Köhler, Christian, 2014. "Bargaining in vertical relationships and suppliers' R&D profitability," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-087, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Ben-Zion Zilberfarb, 1989. "Exchange rates and the geographic distribution of exports: Some evidence from a developing open economy," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 125(1), pages 149-157, March.
    17. James Fenske, 2013. "Does Land Abundance Explain African Institutions?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 123(12), pages 1363-1390, December.
    18. Schertz, Lyle P., 1981. "Inflation And Agriculture An Annotated Bibliography," Staff Reports 276708, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. repec:dgr:rugggd:200251 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Smulders, J.A. & van de Klundert, T.C.M.J., 1992. "Monopolistic competition, product variety and growth : Chamberlin vs. Schumpeter," Discussion Paper 1992-21, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    21. Klette, Tor Jakob & Moen, Jarle & Griliches, Zvi, 2000. "Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 471-495, April.
    22. Fuentelsaz, Lucio & Gómez, Jaime & Palomas, Sergio, 2009. "The effects of new technologies on productivity: An intrafirm diffusion-based assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1172-1180, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:28:y:1996:i:7:p:1299-1313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.