IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v36y2025i4p1906-1928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have the pilot carbon markets achieved synergistic control of carbon abatement and pollution reduction? The quasi-experimental evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Yang
  • Lan Yi
  • Jing Li
  • Qingquan Liang

Abstract

The Chinese government has emphasized the necessity of synergistic control for carbon abatement and pollution reduction in the protection of eco-environment, as part of the 14th Five-Year Plan and the Long-range Objectives Through the Year 2035. As an important tool to reduce CO 2 , the carbon market can also affect the air pollution synergistically. The study utilizes the multi-period difference-in-difference (DID) model to analyze the impact of carbon market on carbon abatement, as well as the synergistic effect on different air pollutants. The study analyzes the mechanisms for carbon market to achieve synergistic control from the perspectives of “quantity†and “category†comprehensively. The findings indicate that: (1) carbon markets can reduce CO 2 significantly, with a synergistic effect mainly observed on SO 2 and soot (dust). These results remain robust when focusing on the industrial sector or adopting the PSM-DID estimation, etc.; (2) the mechanisms to achieve synergistic control vary among different air pollutants. Promotion of technology can only synergistically reduce SO 2 . Optimization of energy consumption structure is the top priority for reducing CO 2 . The most effective mechanism to achieve synergistic control of air pollutants is improvement of energy utilization efficiency; (3) to achieve synergistic control goals, the Chinese national market should prioritize industries that release both CO 2 and NOx in the rolling-out plan, enrich the trading tools, and formulate effective price signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Yang & Lan Yi & Jing Li & Qingquan Liang, 2025. "Have the pilot carbon markets achieved synergistic control of carbon abatement and pollution reduction? The quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(4), pages 1906-1928, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1906-1928
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231201535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231201535
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X231201535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:36:y:2025:i:4:p:1906-1928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.