IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecolab/v32y2021i3p453-471.html

The Australian Government’s business-friendly employment response to COVID-19: A critical discourse analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick O’Keeffe
  • Angelika Papadopoulos

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has created economic crises and considerable loss of employment throughout the world. In the Australian context, social distancing restrictions and business closures contributed to a dramatic increase in unemployment, with 780,000 people losing work within weeks of the first COVID-19 outbreaks. Job losses were concentrated in casualised industries such as retail, recreation, arts and culture, hospitality, and accommodation. We examine policy discourses framing independent work, entrepreneurial workers and flexible work relations as essential for ‘economic recovery’, where this means business flexibility, productivity and future economic prosperity. We draw on these framings to show how the equation of flexible work relations and productivity underpins the Australian Government’s response to unemployment caused by the pandemic, as reflected in policy announcements and proposed changes to industrial relations law. In these proposals, constructions of ‘job creation’ and ‘economic recovery’ rationalise industrial relations changes that further empower business, through conflating public and business interest. At the same time, ensuing labour market deregulation and the changing profile of business renders the very idea of ‘jobs’ tendentious. JEL Codes: J08, J28, J31, J38

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick O’Keeffe & Angelika Papadopoulos, 2021. "The Australian Government’s business-friendly employment response to COVID-19: A critical discourse analysis," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(3), pages 453-471, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:453-471
    DOI: 10.1177/1035304621997891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1035304621997891
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1035304621997891?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Beer & Rebecca Bentley & Emma Baker & Kate Mason & Shelley Mallett & Anne Kavanagh & Tony LaMontagne, 2016. "Neoliberalism, economic restructuring and policy change: Precarious housing and precarious employment in Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1542-1558, June.
    2. Jane Briant Carant, 2017. "Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the Millennium Development Goals’ evolution into the Sustainable Development Goals," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 16-41, January.
    3. Jim Stanford, 2017. "The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 28(3), pages 382-401, September.
    4. Saori Shibata, 2020. "Gig Work and the Discourse of Autonomy: Fictitious Freedom in Japan’s Digital Economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 535-551, June.
    5. Shaun Wilson & Norbert Ebert, 2013. "Precarious work: Economic, sociological and political perspectives," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 24(3), pages 263-278, September.
    6. Gerald F. Davis, 2013. "After the Corporation," Politics & Society, , vol. 41(2), pages 283-308, June.
    7. Buchanan, J. & Watson, I. & Briggs, C. & Campbell, I., 2006. "Beyond Voodoo Economics and Backlash Social Policy: Where Next for Working Life Research and Policy," Australian Bulletin of Labour, National Institute of Labour Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 183-201.
    8. Leah Vosko, 2008. "Temporary Work in Transnational Labor Regulation: SER-Centrism and the Risk of Exacerbating Gendered Precariousness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 88(1), pages 131-145, August.
    9. Glenn Morgan, 2014. "Financialization and the multinational corporation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 183-197, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keevers, Lynne & Rambaldini-Gooding, Delia, 2020. "Practices effective for assisting young people avoid or exit homelessness: Young service recipient's perspectives," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    3. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro & Juan José Cabello-Eras & Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Macarena Donoso-Gonzalez & Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco & J, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Constantine Manolchev & Richard Saundry & Duncan Lewis, 2021. "Breaking up the ‘precariat’: Personalisation, differentiation and deindividuation in precarious work groups," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(3), pages 828-851, August.
    5. Paul Dalziel, 2019. "Wellbeing economics in public policy: A distinctive Australasian contribution?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 478-497, December.
    6. François Bonnet & Clément Théry, 2014. "Sociology and political science in the patrimonial society: implications of Piketty's Capital," Working Papers halshs-01060570, HAL.
    7. Krzysztof Kluza & Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2021. "Achieving Environmental Policy Objectives through the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals. The Case for European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Krenz, Astrid & Strulik, Holger, 2025. "Automation and the fall and rise of the servant economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Nicolás Palacios Crisóstomo & David Kaufmann, 2024. "STRATEGIES AND TACTICS IN PLATFORM URBANISM: Contested Spatial Production through Quick Delivery Platforms in Berlin and Barcelona," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 833-854, September.
    10. Kyoko Sasaki & Wendy Stubbs & Megan Farrelly, 2023. "The relationship between corporate purpose and the sustainable development goals in large Japanese companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2475-2489, September.
    11. Hu, Helen Haixia & Bryson, John & Beaverstock, Jonathan V., 2025. "Triple-loop springboarding and simulacrum enterprises: Financialization and new forms of emerging economy educational international businesses," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3).
    12. Inga Laß & Mark Wooden, 2019. "Non-standard Employment and Wages in Australia," RBA Annual Conference Papers acp2019-04, Reserve Bank of Australia, revised Jul 2019.
    13. Terri L. Griffith & Emma S. Nordbäck & John E. Sawyer & Ronald E. Rice, 2018. "Field study of complements to supervisory leadership in more and less flexible work settings," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Rich Mallett, 2026. "The plat-formalisation fallacy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(1), pages 18-37, February.
    15. Rebecca Mitchell & Yun Shen & Lan Snell, 2022. "The future of work: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2667-2686, June.
    16. Rachel Ong & Gavin A Wood & Melek Cigdem, 2022. "Housing wealth, mortgages and Australians’ labour force participation in later life," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 810-833, March.
    17. Saleh Ahmed Jalal Siam & Mubashshir Bin Mahbub, 2024. "Investigating User Perceptions Of Ai Technology And Its Ethical Implications On Employment Dynamics And Bias," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 22-25, April.
    18. Señoret, Andrés & Ramirez, Maria Inés & Rehner, Johannes, 2022. "Employment and sustainability: The relation between precarious work and spatial inequality in the neoliberal city," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    19. Fahin Faras & Balwant Singh Mehta & Amrita Datta, 2025. "Platform-based Gig Work in India’s Labour Statistics," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 68(1), pages 323-337, March.
    20. repec:osf:socarx:vstm4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cuenca-García, Eduardo & Sánchez, Angeles & Navarro-Pabsdorf, Margarita, 2019. "Assessing the performance of the least developed countries in terms of the Millennium Development Goals," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 54-66.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J38 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecolab:v:32:y:2021:i:3:p:453-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.