IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v34y2013i2p355-378.html

From ‘the best kept company secret’ to a more proficient structure of employee representation: The role of EWC delegates with a managerial background

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremé Charles Snook

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

  • Michael Whittall

    (Nottingham Trent University, UK)

Abstract

This article is a longitudinal case study that demonstrates how company middle managers acting as European works council (EWC) delegates are well placed to represent the interests of the wider workforce. Contrary to widely held assumptions about the role of management on EWCs, namely that such delegates represent nothing more than the ‘managerial capture’ of this European institution, the article exemplifies such delegates as possessing skills sets which incorporate communication, organization, strategy, assertiveness, tact and diplomacy that can benefit the EWC. The delegates in this study developed both solidarity and a shared sense of identity among employees that spanned national borders; delegates also influenced both company policy and strategy. Ultimately these delegates operating in a strictly non-unionized IT company helped transform the company EWC from its initial description as ‘the best kept company secret’ into a more purposeful structure of employee representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremé Charles Snook & Michael Whittall, 2013. "From ‘the best kept company secret’ to a more proficient structure of employee representation: The role of EWC delegates with a managerial background," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 34(2), pages 355-378, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:34:y:2013:i:2:p:355-378
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X12448556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X12448556
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X12448556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul J. Gollan, 2003. "All Talk But No Voice: Employee Voice at the Eurotunnel Call Centre," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 24(4), pages 509-541, November.
    2. Richard Hyman, 1997. "The Future of Employee Representation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 309-336, September.
    3. T. Dickson & H. V. McLachlan & P. Prior & K. Swales, 1988. "Big Blue and the Unions: IBM, Individualism and Trade Union Strategy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 2(4), pages 506-520, December.
    4. Michael Whittall & Alan Tuckman, 2008. "Employee Forums in the UK: Friend or Foe of Trade Unions?," International Journal of Action Research, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 4(3), pages 225-253.
    5. Michael Whittall, 2010. "The problem of national industrial relations traditions in European works councils: The example of BMW," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(4_suppl), pages 70-85, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alan Tuckman & Jeremé Snook, 2014. "Between consultation and collective bargaining? The changing role of non-union employee representatives: a case study from the finance sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 77-97, January.
    2. Bryson, Alex, 2001. "Union effects on managerial and employee perceptions of employee relations in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4957, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Miguel Martínez Lucio & Stefania Marino & Heather Connolly, 2017. "Organising as a strategy to reach precarious and marginalised workers. A review of debates on the role of the political dimension and the dilemmas of representation and solidarity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(1), pages 31-46, February.
    4. Aleksandra Gregorič & Thomas Poulsen, 2020. "When Do Employees Choose to Be Represented on the Board of Directors? Empirical Analysis of Board‐Level Employee Representation in Denmark," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 241-272, June.
    5. Raymond Markey & Greg Patmore, 2009. "The Role of the State in the Diffusion of Industrial Democracy: South Australia, 1972—9," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(1), pages 37-66, February.
    6. Ilaria Armaroli, 2022. "Integrating direct employee voice within the framework of worker representation: The role of an Italian trade union in organising disintermediation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 658-684, May.
    7. John T. Addison & Alex Bryson & Paulino Teixeira & André Pahnke & Lutz Bellmann, 2013. "The Extent of Collective Bargaining and Workplace Representation: Transitions between States and their Determinants. A Comparative Analysis of Germany and Great Britain," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 60(2), pages 182-209, May.
    8. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 639-660, November.
    9. Anthony Ferner & Phil Almond & Trevor Colling & Tony Edwards, 2005. "Policies on Union Representation in US Multinationals in the UK: Between Micro‐Politics and Macro‐Institutions," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 703-728, December.
    10. Michael Whittall, 2010. "The problem of national industrial relations traditions in European works councils: The example of BMW," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 31(4_suppl), pages 70-85, November.
    11. Ralph Darlington, 2018. "The leadership component of Kelly’s mobilisation theory: Contribution, tensions, limitations and further development," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 617-638, November.
    12. John T. Addison & Claus Schnabel, 2011. "Worker Directors: A German Product that Did Not Export?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 354-374, April.
    13. Panagiotopoulos, Miltiadis, 2005. "The Evolution of Trade Unions in Britain," MPRA Paper 4290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2007.
    14. Christian Lévesque & Gregor Murray, 2010. "Understanding union power: resources and capabilities for renewing union capacity," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 16(3), pages 333-350, August.
    15. Gollan, Paul & Markey, Ray & Ross, Iain, 2001. "Additional forms of employee representation in Australia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5033, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Alex Bryson & Michael White, 2016. "Unions and the economic basis of attitudes," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 360-378, July.
    17. Rae Cooper & Chris Briggs, 2009. "`Trojan Horse' or `Vehicle for Organizing'? Non-Union Collective Agreement Making and Trade Unions in Australia," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 30(1), pages 93-119, February.
    18. David Beale & Helge Hoel, 2011. "Workplace bullying and the employment relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(1), pages 5-18, March.
    19. Barbara Bechter & Bernd Brandl & Thomas Prosser, 2017. "Engagement in European social dialogue: an investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 365-382, July.
    20. Carla Lima Aranzaes & Christian Lyhne Ibsen & Philip S. DeOrtentiis & Maite Tapia, 2024. "Solidarity with atypical workers? Survey evidence from the General Motors versus United Auto Workers strike in 2019," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 72-97, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:34:y:2013:i:2:p:355-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.