IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/crnind/v22y2021i3-4p189-211.html

A multi-sided market of personal data resource allocation: An empirical study of China’s car-hailing platform

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Huang

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, 150232Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany; Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Beijing, China)

  • Miltos Ladikas

    (Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, 150232Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Berlin, Germany)

  • Guangxi He

    (Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development, Beijing, China)

  • Julia Hahn
  • Jens Schippl

Abstract

The current rapid development of online car-hailing services creates a serious challenge to the existing paradigm of market governance and antitrust policy. However, the debate on the market structure of the car-hailing platform requires more empirical evidence to uncover its functions. This research adopts an interdisciplinary methodology based on computer science and economics, and including software reverse engineering tools applied to the interoperability of the terminal application and resource allocation model, to demonstrate the topological market structure of personal data resources allocation in China’s car-hailing industry. Within the discussion of the hybrid nature of technology and economy, the analysis results clearly show that China’s car-hailing platform services present a multi-sided market structure when seen from the perspective of personal data resource allocation. Personal data resource (PDR), that is considered an essential market resource, is applied as an asset transferred unhindered between platforms via the application programming interface, and thus, creating a new market allocation mechanism. The connection between the car-hailing platforms and social media platforms is an essential aspect of the market competition in the domain. As applications of online platforms increase in the global context, this research offers a new perspective in personal data resource allocation with implications for the governance of the platform economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Huang & Miltos Ladikas & Guangxi He & Julia Hahn & Jens Schippl, 2021. "A multi-sided market of personal data resource allocation: An empirical study of China’s car-hailing platform," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(3-4), pages 189-211, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:22:y:2021:i:3-4:p:189-211
    DOI: 10.1177/17835917211051223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17835917211051223
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/17835917211051223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Ian, 2020. "The technical components of interoperability as a tool for competition regulation," OSF Preprints 6er3p, Center for Open Science.
    2. Michael L. Katz, 2019. "Multisided Platforms, Big Data, and a Little Antitrust Policy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 54(4), pages 695-716, June.
    3. E. Glen Weyl, 2010. "A Price Theory of Multi-sided Platforms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1642-1672, September.
    4. Chiu, Jonathan & Wong, Tsz-Nga, 2022. "Payments on digital platforms: Resiliency, interoperability and welfare," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Friso Bostoen & Daniel Mândrescu, 2020. "Assessing abuse of dominance in the platform economy: a case study of app stores," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2-3), pages 431-491, September.
    6. Kevin J. Boudreau & Andrei Hagiu, 2009. "Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators," Chapters, in: Annabelle Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    8. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    9. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    10. Moshe A. Barach & Aseem Kaul & Ming D. Leung & Sibo Lu, 2019. "Strategic Redundancy in the Use of Big Data: Evidence from a Two-Sided Labor Market," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 298-322, December.
    11. Edward Iacobucci & Francesco Ducci, 2019. "The Google search case in Europe: tying and the single monopoly profit theorem in two-sided markets," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 15-42, February.
    12. Just, Natascha, 2018. "Governing online platforms: Competition policy in times of platformization," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 386-394.
    13. Hagiu, Andrei & Wright, Julian, 2015. "Multi-sided platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 162-174.
    14. Brown, Ian, 2020. "Interoperability as a tool for competition regulation," LawRxiv fbvxd, Center for Open Science.
    15. repec:osf:osfxxx:6er3p_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. repec:osf:socarx:fbu27_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lei Huang & Yandong Zhao & Liang Mei & Peiyi Wu & Zhihua Zhao & Yijun Mao, 2019. "Structural Holes in the Multi-Sided Market: A Market Allocation Structure Analysis of China’s Car-Hailing Platform in the Context of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Jiatao Li & Liang Chen & Jingtao Yi & Jiye Mao & Jianwen Liao, 2019. "Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1448-1463, December.
    19. Nizar Abdelkafi & Christina Raasch & Angela Roth & R. Srinivasan, 2019. "Multi-sided platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 553-559, December.
    20. Juan J. Montero & Matthias Finger, 2017. "Platformed! Network industries and the new digital paradigm," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(3-4), pages 217-239, September.
    21. Zhenzhen Xie & Jiatao Li, 2018. "Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(2), pages 222-245, February.
    22. Wu, Tian & Zhang, Mengbo & Tian, Xin & Wang, Shouyang & Hua, Guowei, 2020. "Spatial differentiation and network externality in pricing mechanism of online car hailing platform," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 275-283.
    23. Brown, Ian, 2020. "Interoperability as a tool for competition regulation," LawArchive fbvxd_v1, Center for Open Science.
    24. David S. Evans & Michael D. Noel, 2008. "The Analysis Of Mergers That Involve Multisided Platform Businesses," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 663-695.
    25. Juan Montero & Matthias Finger, 2021. "Regulating digital platforms as the new network industries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(2), pages 111-126, June.
    26. Nicholas Economides & Evangelos Katsamakas, 2006. "Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1057-1071, July.
    27. Jens Schippl & Annika Arnold, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Views on Multimodal Urban Mobility Futures: A Matter of Policy Interventions or Just the Logical Result of Digitalization?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Huang & Yandong Zhao & Liang Mei & Peiyi Wu & Zhihua Zhao & Yijun Mao, 2019. "Structural Holes in the Multi-Sided Market: A Market Allocation Structure Analysis of China’s Car-Hailing Platform in the Context of Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Konrad Degen & Alexander Gleiss, 2025. "Time to break up? The case for tailor-made digital platform regulation based on platform-governance standard types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Liu, Yihui & Li, Yi & Wu, Aiqi & Kumar, Vikas, 2025. "Leveraging demand-side strategies on the digital platform for global success: The role of innovation speed in non-digital participant firms' internationalization," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(5).
    5. Kang, Zhengyao & Kou, Hongwei & Zhou, Di & Shi, Xinwei & Parente, Ronaldo & Rong, Ke, 2025. "Platform-based multinational corporations (PMNCs):A research agenda in the field of international business," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3).
    6. Peters, Frank, 2018. "The business of video games is a multi-player game : Essays on governance choices and performance in a two-sided market in the cultural industries," Other publications TiSEM 886b3148-4bbb-4ea4-b666-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    8. Gorwa, Robert, 2024. "The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 299876, May.
    9. Yonghong Sun, 2025. "Versioning strategies for online dating platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2525-2551, August.
    10. Basaure, Arturo & Vesselkov, Alexandr & Töyli, Juuso, 2020. "Internet of things (IoT) platform competition: Consumer switching versus provider multihoming," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    11. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    12. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    13. Lukas Stricker & Joël Wagner & Angela Zeier Röschmann, 2023. "The Future of Insurance Intermediation in the Age of the Digital Platform Economy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-32, August.
    14. Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Hosany, Sameer & Xia, Yusen & Schoenherr, Tobias & Xia, Lan, 2025. "Market competition in the platform economy: new insights, integrative framework and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    16. Afilipoaie, Adelaida & Donders, Karen & Ballon, Pieter, 2022. "The European Commission's approach to mergers involving software-based platforms: Towards a better understanding of platform power," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    17. Carrillo, Juan D. & Tan, Guofu, 2021. "Platform competition with complementary products," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Hildebrandt, Christian & Arnold, René, 2018. "Marktbeobachtung in der digitalen Wirtschaft – Ein Modell zur Analyse von Online-Plattformen," WIK Discussion Papers 427, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    19. Jingtao Yi & Jinqiu He & Lihong Yang, 2019. "Platform heterogeneity, platform governance and complementors’ product performance: an empirical study of the mobile application industry," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Hongryol Cha & Masaaki Kotabe & Jie Wu, 2023. "Reshaping Internationalization Strategy and Control for Global E-Commerce and Digital Transactions: A Hayekian Perspective," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 161-192, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:crnind:v:22:y:2021:i:3-4:p:189-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.