IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v59y2023i3p307-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Comparison of Trade Relations Between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India: Gravity Model

Author

Listed:
  • Amsalu K. Addis

    (School of Business, Hubei University, Hubei, Wuhan, China; Research Center of Open Economy, Hubei University, Hubei, Wuhan, China. amy.kid370@gmail.com)

  • Yang Yu

    (School of Education, Hubei University, Hubei, Wuhan, China. yuyang20140037@126.com)

  • Zhu Zuping

    (School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fujian, Fuzhou, China. zhuzuping@163.com)

Abstract

This study evaluates the trade relations between Ethiopia and China as well as Ethiopia and India, and then compares the bilateral trade volume between them. It also examines the nexus between international trade and economic growth. Panel data were adopted to estimate the impact of China’s and India’s bilateral trade with Ethiopia for the 25 years duration (1990–2015). The gravity model has been employed in order to evaluate and compare the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India. To examine the collected data SPSS has been employed. The study also outlined three different hypotheses and examined them based on the consistency of the statistical empirical result of the study as well as the positive unconditional coherence with previous academic literature. The result demonstrates the bilateral trade between Ethiopia–China, 0.321, was found to be higher than Ethiopia–India, 0.136. The study’s empirical result also highlights that the influence of geographical proximity alone cannot be a determinant effect on bilateral trade, and discovers a significant linear relationship between a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) and a partner country’s economic size.

Suggested Citation

  • Amsalu K. Addis & Yang Yu & Zhu Zuping, 2023. "Evaluation and Comparison of Trade Relations Between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India: Gravity Model," China Report, , vol. 59(3), pages 307-326, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:3:p:307-326
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455231187695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455231187695
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455231187695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MacKellar, Landis & Woergoetter, Andreas & Woerz, Julia, 2000. "Economic Development Problems of Landlocked Countries," Transition Economics Series 14, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    2. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1997. "Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 72, October.
    3. Walter Eltis, 2000. "The Classical Theory of Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-0-230-59820-1.
    4. Walter Eltis, 2000. "The Classical Theory of Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Classical Theory of Economic Growth, edition 0, chapter 9, pages 310-338, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ousmane Amadou, 2020. "The African Continental Free Trade Agreement: Why Should the Republic of Benin Ratify the Agreement? Three Possible Explanations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(12), pages 507-511, December.
    2. Genchev, Vassil, 2005. "Immigration to the European Union - Challenges and Opportunities for a Europe of 25+," MPRA Paper 4249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. SAM, Vichet, 2018. "Overeducation among graduates in developing countries: What impact on economic growth?," MPRA Paper 87674, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Drakopoulos, Stavros A. & Karayiannis, Anastassios, 2007. "The Paradox of Happiness: Evidence from the Late Pre-Classical and Classical Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 71657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Manuel Rubio-García & Santiago Castaño-Salas, 2020. "El excedente económico en economías periféricas: una perspectiva teórica desde los aportes de Baran, Prebisch y Furtado," Ensayos de Economía 19133, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    6. Mehmet AKYOL, 2016. "Effectiveness of State Aid for Investments In The Process of Economic Growth: Turkish Case," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 391-400, June.
    7. Cvetanović Slobodan & Mitrović Uroš & Jurakić Marko, 2019. "Institutions as the Driver of Economic Growth in Classic, Neoclasic and Endogenous Theory," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 57(1), pages 111-125, March.
    8. Mark Yanochik & John King, 2015. "The Classical Bargaining Model for Organized Labor," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(3), pages 375-382, September.
    9. Duncan K. Foley & Thomas R. Michl, 2010. "The Classical Theory of Growth and Distribution," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Mark Rogers, 2003. "A Survey of Economic Growth," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(244), pages 112-135, March.
    11. Davide Fiaschi & Rodolfo Signorino, 2003. "Consumption patterns, development and growth: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Robert Malthus," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 5-24.
    12. Isabel PROENÇA & Enrique MARTINEZ-GALÁN & Maria Paula FONTOURA, 2017. "Trade Potential Revisited: A Panel Data Analysis For Zimbabwe," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 17(1), pages 113-130.
    13. Islam, Sulequl, 2003. "Expansions of the European Union and the NAFTA: Implications for New and Non-Member countries," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 3(2).
    14. Nilanjan Banik & John Gilbert, 2010. "Regional Integration and Trade Costs in South Asia," Chapters, in: Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone (ed.), Trade Facilitation and Regional Cooperation in Asia, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Michele Fratianni & Francesco Marchionne, 2011. "The Limits to Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Peter Egger & Douglas Nelson, 2011. "How Bad Is Antidumping? Evidence from Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(4), pages 1374-1390, November.
    17. Erik Marel & Ben Shepherd, 2013. "Services Trade, Regulation and Regional Integration: Evidence from Sectoral Data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(11), pages 1393-1405, November.
    18. Marc Flandreau & Mathilde Maurel, 2005. "Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 135-152, April.
    19. Philippa Dee & Jyothi Gali, 2005. "The Trade and Investment Effects of Preferential Trading Arrangements," NBER Chapters, in: International Trade in East Asia, pages 133-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Gaël Raballand, 2003. "Determinants of the Negative Impact of Being Landlocked on Trade: An Empirical Investigation Through the Central Asian Case," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 45(4), pages 520-536, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:3:p:307-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.