IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v4y2020i12p507-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The African Continental Free Trade Agreement: Why Should the Republic of Benin Ratify the Agreement? Three Possible Explanations

Author

Listed:
  • Ousmane Amadou

    (Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, department of International Relations (North Cyprus))

Abstract

Every economic decision is motivated by mostly “Tree Big Ideas†: incentives, the power of trade, and the institutional framework. The motives behind the creation of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) combine some of these ideas; they were inspired by the neoliberal free trade theory. From the conception to the implementation of the first phase of negotiations, many scholars and international institutions in Africa and around the world evaluated and analyzed the potential social, economic, and political impacts of the agreement. Some evaluations seem optimistic while others are cautious. But most of them failed to appreciate how individual countries’ perspectives can also impact in the implementation process. States are sovereign entities and as such are free to choose whether or not to participate in free trade agreements. No scholarly article so far tried to analyze why Republic of Benin should to ratify the AfCFTA and its impacts on the economy of the country. Certainly, the Republic of Benin and several other states that, are yet to ratify the agreement are still carefully analyzing the possible outcomes. This research aims to apply Cowan & Tabarrok (2013) approach on different reasons that can motivate individuals, institutions, or states to conclude certain economic decisions. The republic of Benin is used as a case study to theoretically and empirically test how these neoliberal ideas can be applied in real-life situations. We have used a mixed research methodology to collect data and investigated the political and economic reasons that would motivate the Republic of Benin to participate in the AfCFTA. As of January 1, 2021, the agreement is expected to come into force, out of the 54 signatory states over 62% have already ratified the agreement. The AfCFTA has the potential to grow the intra African trade by 53%. It is also an excellent tool of African integration. After taking into consideration all these variables and considering the fact that Benin has signed the agreement, this paper argued that it will eventually ratify it since the potential benefits outweigh the costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ousmane Amadou, 2020. "The African Continental Free Trade Agreement: Why Should the Republic of Benin Ratify the Agreement? Three Possible Explanations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(12), pages 507-511, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:12:p:507-511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-4-issue-12/507-511.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/the-african-continental-free-trade-agreement-why-should-the-republic-of-benin-ratify-the-agreement-three-possible-explanations/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walter Eltis, 2000. "The Classical Theory of Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-0-230-59820-1.
    2. Walter Eltis, 2000. "The Classical Theory of Economic Growth," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Classical Theory of Economic Growth, edition 0, chapter 9, pages 310-338, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Genchev, Vassil, 2005. "Immigration to the European Union - Challenges and Opportunities for a Europe of 25+," MPRA Paper 4249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. SAM, Vichet, 2018. "Overeducation among graduates in developing countries: What impact on economic growth?," MPRA Paper 87674, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Drakopoulos, Stavros A. & Karayiannis, Anastassios, 2007. "The Paradox of Happiness: Evidence from the Late Pre-Classical and Classical Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 71657, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Manuel Rubio-García & Santiago Castaño-Salas, 2020. "El excedente económico en economías periféricas: una perspectiva teórica desde los aportes de Baran, Prebisch y Furtado," Ensayos de Economía 19133, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín.
    5. Mehmet AKYOL, 2016. "Effectiveness of State Aid for Investments In The Process of Economic Growth: Turkish Case," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 391-400, June.
    6. Cvetanović Slobodan & Mitrović Uroš & Jurakić Marko, 2019. "Institutions as the Driver of Economic Growth in Classic, Neoclasic and Endogenous Theory," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 57(1), pages 111-125, March.
    7. Mark Yanochik & John King, 2015. "The Classical Bargaining Model for Organized Labor," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 43(3), pages 375-382, September.
    8. Duncan K. Foley & Thomas R. Michl, 2010. "The Classical Theory of Growth and Distribution," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Amsalu K. Addis & Yang Yu & Zhu Zuping, 2023. "Evaluation and Comparison of Trade Relations Between Ethiopia–China and Ethiopia–India: Gravity Model," China Report, , vol. 59(3), pages 307-326, August.
    10. Mark Rogers, 2003. "A Survey of Economic Growth," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(244), pages 112-135, March.
    11. Davide Fiaschi & Rodolfo Signorino, 2003. "Consumption patterns, development and growth: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Robert Malthus," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 5-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:12:p:507-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.