IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v48y2023i1p171-195.html

Effective coordination and innovation-facilitating role of science parks: The place-based approach with paradoxical outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Zhu
  • Ryan W Tang

    (Australian Centre for Asian Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia)

  • Ke Xing

    (School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia)

Abstract

The place-based regional industrial strategies provide a novel approach to examining the role of science parks in enhancing regional innovation with place-based policies. With qualitative interviews and case analyses, this study investigates how a place-based science park affects innovation activities of technology-focused companies. Our research findings demonstrate paradoxical nature with both positive and negative aspects of firms’ strategies that cope with obstacles such as the lack of funding for R&D and weak policy on IP protection. These obstacles hinder the collaboration on innovation and strengthen the effect of economic uncertainty on companies’ short-term survival orientation. Important implications for both theory and practice are discussed with possible future research directions identified. JEL Classification: O32, M10, M38

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Zhu & Ryan W Tang & Ke Xing, 2023. "Effective coordination and innovation-facilitating role of science parks: The place-based approach with paradoxical outcomes," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(1), pages 171-195, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:48:y:2023:i:1:p:171-195
    DOI: 10.1177/03128962221098134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962221098134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03128962221098134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Bailey & Christos Pitelis & Philip R Tomlinson, 2018. "A place-based developmental regional industrial strategy for sustainable capture of co-created value," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(6), pages 1521-1542.
    2. Paul Hildreth & David Bailey, 2013. "The economics behind the move to ‘localism’ in England," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(2), pages 233-249.
    3. Clarysse, Bart & Wright, Mike & Bruneel, Johan & Mahajan, Aarti, 2014. "Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1164-1176.
    4. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    5. Fiona Sussan & Zoltan J. Acs, 2017. "The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 55-73, June.
    6. Iman Seoudi & Salma Mahmoud, 2016. "Public Policy For Venture Capital: A Comparative Study Of Emirates, Saudi Arabia And Egypt," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 7(1), pages 19-42.
    7. Mas-Verdú, Francisco & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo & Roig-Tierno, Norat, 2015. "Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 793-796.
    8. Christian Helmers, 2019. "Choose the Neighbor before the House: Agglomeration Externalities in a UK Science Park," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 31-55.
    9. Herman Aguinis & Angelo M. Solarino, 2019. "Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(8), pages 1291-1315, August.
    10. Kazuyuki Motohashi, 2013. "The role of the science park in innovation performance of start-up firms: an empirical analysis of Tsinghua Science Park in Beijing," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 578-599, October.
    11. Arnault Morisson & Mathieu Doussineau, 2019. "Regional innovation governance and place-based policies: design, implementation and implications," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 101-116, January.
    12. Xie, Kefan & Song, Yu & Zhang, Weiyong & Hao, Jiahui & Liu, Zimei & Chen, Yun, 2018. "Technological entrepreneurship in science parks: A case study of Wuhan Donghu High-Tech Zone," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 156-168.
    13. Fabrizio Barca & Philip McCann & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, 2012. "The Case For Regional Development Intervention: Place‐Based Versus Place‐Neutral Approaches," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 134-152, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deepika Dixit & Anubha Shekhar Sinha, 2025. "Entrepreneurial functions performed by women entrepreneurs: Do incubators make a difference?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(3), pages 939-961, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steve Fothergill & Tony Gore & Peter Wells, 2019. "Industrial strategy and the UK regions: sectorally narrow and spatially blind," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(3), pages 445-466.
    2. Andrew Johnston & Peter Wells, 2020. "Assessing the role of universities in a place-based Industrial Strategy: Evidence from the UK," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(4), pages 384-402, June.
    3. T. Theeranattapong & D. Pickernell & C. Simms, 2021. "Systematic literature review paper: the regional innovation system-university-science park nexus," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2017-2050, December.
    4. Xaver Neumeyer & Susana C. Santos & Michael H. Morris, 2019. "Who is left out: exploring social boundaries in entrepreneurial ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 462-484, April.
    5. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Ozor, Jude & Ronde, Patrick & Tung, Sarah & Boyer, James, 2024. "The “Middleground” as a catalyst for the dynamics of innovation in an ecosystem? The case of Eurasanté in Hauts-de-France," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    7. Bruno Brandão Fischer & André Cherubini Alves & Nicholas S. Vonortas & Ross Brown, 2026. "Foundations of entrepreneurial ecosystems configurations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 199-225, February.
    8. Amel Attour & Loubna Echajari & Nicolas Remond, 2023. "Organizational innovation as an enabler for the emergence of a non-precompetitive knowledge ecosystem," Post-Print hal-04126171, HAL.
    9. Jiewang Chu & Jiaxuan Li, 2022. "The Composition and Operation Mechanism of Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: A Study of Hangzhou Yunqi Town as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Karl Aiginger & Matthias Firgo, 2015. "Regional Competitiveness Under New Perspectives. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 26," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58501.
    11. Ahmad MUKSIN & Bhakti Nur AVIANTO, 2021. "Governance Innovation: One-Stop Integrated Service To Enhance Quality Service And Public Satisfaction," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 40-60, February.
    12. David B. Audretsch & James A. Cunningham & Donald F. Kuratko & Erik E. Lehmann & Matthias Menter, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 313-325, April.
    13. Cyrine Ben-Hafaïedh & Mirela Xheneti & Pekka Stenholm & Robert Blackburn & Friederike Welter & David Urbano, 2024. "The interplay of context and entrepreneurship: the new frontier for contextualisation research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 571-582, February.
    14. Daniel Sunghwan Cho & Paul Ryan & Giulio Buciuni, 2022. "Evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems: a research pathway," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1865-1883, April.
    15. Margarida Madaleno & Max Nathan & Henry Overman & Sevrin Waights, 2022. "Incubators, accelerators and urban economic development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 281-300, February.
    16. Paul Hildreth & David Bailey, 2014. "Place-based economic development strategy in England: Filling the missing space," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 29(4-5), pages 363-377, June.
    17. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    18. Rogerson Christian M., 2020. "Using Municipal Tourism Assets for Leveraging Local Economic Development in South Africa," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 48(48), pages 47-63, June.
    19. Johannes Hähnlein & Matthias Baum & Carolin Durst, 2026. "Giving something back: how reciprocal motivation drives entrepreneurs to contribute to their entrepreneurial ecosystem," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 451-484, January.
    20. Marco Bellandi & Silvia Lombardi & Erica Santini, 2020. "Traditional manufacturing areas and the emergence of product-service systems: the case of Italy," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(2), pages 311-331, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M38 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:48:y:2023:i:1:p:171-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.