IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rse/wpaper/v19y2020i1p33-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Competitive Advantage in Jordanian Telecom Companies: "A Case Study on Orange Company"

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Hashem Al Assaf

    (Business school, Business Administration Department Al - Zaytouna University, Amman, Jordan)

Abstract

The present study aimed to recognize the impact of intellectual capital in achieving competitive advantage in Jordanian telecommunications companies. The study sample consisted of(245) employees, who were selected by a simple random method, and it represents about(42.3%) of the overall study population. The study adopted a descriptive field survey methodology. Two instruments were developed by the researcher to measure the intellectual capital and the competitive advantage variables. The study aimed to answer the following two questions: - Does the intellectual capital with its dimensions (human capital, structural capital, overhead capital) exist in Jordanian telecom companies? - Is there an impact of intellectual capital with its dimensions (human capital, structural capital, and capital) on achieving a competitive advantage with its dimensions to the Jordanian telecom companies?. The population of the study represented all the employees of Orange Mobile Telecommunication Companies in Jordan and the sample of the study consisted of (245 )employees. After the data has been collected and analyzed the following results have been found: - There is a significant impact of intellectual capital dimensions(human capital) on competitive advantage in the Jordanian telecommunications companies, and the value of Beta indicates a positive direction of the relationship. - There is a significant impact on the intellectual capital dimensions(structural capital) on competitive advantage in Jordanian telecommunications companies. And the value of Beta indicates a positive direction of the relationship. - There is a significant impact of the intellectual capital dimensions(relational capital) on competitive advantage Jordanian telecommunications companies, and the value of Beta indicates for a positive direction of the relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Hashem Al Assaf, 2020. "Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Competitive Advantage in Jordanian Telecom Companies: "A Case Study on Orange Company"," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 19(1), pages 33-46, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:33-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://reaser.eu/RePec/rse/wpaper/REASER19_03AlAssaf_P33-46.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Violina P. Rindova & Charles J. Fombrun, 1999. "Constructing competitive advantage: the role of firm–constituent interactions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 691-710, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    2. María Dolores Aledo‐Ruiz & Eva Martínez‐Caro & José Manuel Santos‐Jaén, 2022. "The influence of corporate social responsibility on students' emotional appeal in the HEIs: The mediating effect of reputation and corporate image," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 578-592, May.
    3. Christopher Durugbo & Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah, 2019. "Global sustainability under uncertainty: How do multinationals craft regulatory policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1500-1516, November.
    4. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya & Arvind Sahay & Arunaditya Sahay, 2022. "The Quest for Competitive Advantage: The Role of Technology Depth and Breadth at the Customer Interface," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 47(4), pages 274-287, December.
    5. Sepideh Parsa & Reza Kouhy, 2008. "Social Reporting by Companies Listed on the Alternative Investment Market," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 345-360, May.
    6. Elizabeth George Pontikes, 2022. "Category innovation in the software industry: 1990–2002," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1697-1727, September.
    7. Anne Bartel-Radic & Robert Paturel, 2006. "L'apprentissage organisationnel de la compétence interculturelle," Post-Print hal-03566048, HAL.
    8. Mahka Moeen & Rajshree Agarwal & Sonali K. Shah, 2020. "Building Industries by Building Knowledge: Uncertainty Reduction over Industry Milestones," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 218-244, September.
    9. Nguyen Minh Ha & Le Quoc Phong & Tran Kiem Viet Thang & Huynh Luong Tam & Tran Hai Dang & Nguyen Thi Mai Hoa, 2023. "Mediating role of corporate reputation in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and repurchase intention: A case study of McDonald’s fast food restaurant chain," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(2), pages 19-38.
    10. Wijnberg, Nachoem M., 2011. "Classification systems and selection systems: The risks of radical innovation and category spanning," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 297-306, September.
    11. Tong, Xun & Lai, Kee-hung & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Supply chain security certification and operational performance: The role of upstream complexity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Nada Basir, 2020. "Reputation Enhancing Through Patent Portfolios: An Exploration of Lapsed Patents and IPOS," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 42-56, February.
    13. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    14. Wu, Bao & Monfort, Abel & Jin, Chenfei & Shen, Xinyan, 2022. "Substantial response or impression management? Compliance strategies for sustainable development responsibility in family firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Daniel Engler & Gino Cattani & Joe Porac, 2020. "Studying the Incubation of a New Product Market Through Realized and Alternative Histories," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 160-192, September.
    16. Lallement, Jeanne & Dejean, Sylvain & Euzéby, Florence & Martinez, Carole, 2020. "The interaction between reputation and information search: Evidence of information avoidance and confirmation bias," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Shamir, Noam & Zvilichovsky, David, 2022. "Dynamic reputation, project selection and market efficiency: The importance of small projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    18. Hyunjung Ji & Nicole Darnall, 2022. "How do external conditions affect the design of local governments' sustainability strategies?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 910-929, July.
    19. Pacheco, Desirée F. & Khoury, Theodore A., 2023. "Social movements and entrepreneurial activity: A study of the U.S. solar energy industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    20. Ciaran Heavey & Zeki Simsek & Christina Kyprianou & Marten Risius, 2020. "How do strategic leaders engage with social media? A theoretical framework for research and practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(8), pages 1490-1527, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intellectual Capital; Competitive Advantage; Jordanian telecom companies; Orange Company;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:19:y:2020:i:1:p:33-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Epure (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pgsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.