IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility Communication in the Age of New Media: Towards the Logic of Sustainability Communication

Listed author(s):
  • Uzoechi NWAGBARA


    (Greenwich School of Management, London, United Kingdom)

  • Patrick REID


    (University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom)

Registered author(s):

    The monopoly of traditional media is gradually being eroded as new media offers speedy, multiple and innovative ways in which companies can better engage with other stakeholders. It is therefore pertinent to take a look at the ways in which corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication is being reshaped by this evolving communications landscape. Also, new media is reshaping CSR communication for sustainability and effective stakeholder engagement. Effective stakeholder communication facilitates organisational success and legitimacy. This paper’s aim is to contribute to the burgeoning literature on the development of CSR concept via the lens of CSR communication by using the strategy of new media to advance this. The methodology adopted is mainly a review of literature, which parallels the conceptualisation of sustainability communication as articulated by Godemann & Michelsen (2012). The paper is essentially conceptual in scope but particularly identities how new media can be used to advance CSR communication. Thus, as this paper proposes, as the age of new media opens a plethora of channels as well as strategies to engage with stakeholders, organisations need to tap into these energies for a better corporate-stakeholder engagement. Insight and timely engagement will support the achievement of corporate objectives.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania in its journal REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT.

    Volume (Year): 14 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 400-414

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:400-414
    Contact details of provider: Postal:

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Melé, Domenec & Guillen, Manuel, 2006. "Intellectual evolution of strategic management and its relationship with ethics and social responsibility," IESE Research Papers D/658, IESE Business School.
    2. Jensen, Michael C., 2002. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(02), pages 235-256, April.
    3. Adam Lindgreen & José-Rodrigo Córdoba, 2010. "Editorial: Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 167-170, February.
    4. Adaeze Okoye, 2009. "Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 613-627, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:400-414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marian Nastase)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.