IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/arasju/v6y2025i2p24-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Governance in State-Owned Enterprises: A Bibliometric Analysis of Key Theories and the Current State of Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel-VictoraÈ™ STÄ‚NILÄ‚

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Constantin-Marius PROFIROIU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sorin BURLACU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest; Romania)

  • Edita-Carmen BOKOR

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is an increasingly active area of research in the international literature, amid persistent concerns about their efficiency, transparency and vulnerability to political influence. In the context of administrative reforms and pressures for performance in the public sector, understanding the theoretical and geographical evolution of studies dedicated to governance in SOEs is becoming essential for researchers and decision-makers. The aim of this article is to conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of the academic literature published in the period 2000–2024, using the Scopus database and VOSviewer software to map scientific networks and emerging themes. The study aims to identify the dominant theories used in corporate governance research in SOEs (such as agency theory, stakeholder theory and stewardship theory), to highlight influential scientific contributions and to analyze the geographical distribution of academic production. The methodology is based on the selection and coding of over 300 relevant articles, followed by the visualization of keyword co-occurrence networks and collaborations between authors and institutions. The results indicate a constant increase in interest in this topic, but also a conceptual fragmentation and limited international collaboration. The main contribution of the research consists in providing a rigorous synthesis of the current state of the literature and in formulating future research directions, with an emphasis on comparative, cross-regional and theoretically anchored studies. The direct beneficiaries are public administration researchers, government decision-makers and practitioners involved in governance reform in public enterprises. The conclusions emphasize the need to strengthen integrated approaches and transnational collaborations to increase the scientific relevance and practical impact of future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel-VictoraÈ™ STÄ‚NILÄ‚ & Constantin-Marius PROFIROIU & Sorin BURLACU & Edita-Carmen BOKOR, 2025. "Corporate Governance in State-Owned Enterprises: A Bibliometric Analysis of Key Theories and the Current State of Debate," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 6(2), pages 24-37, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:24-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aras.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Stanila-et-al_ARAS_2025-v2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
    2. Andrew West, 2006. "Theorising South Africa’s Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(4), pages 433-448, November.
    3. Albert Ochien'g Abang'a & David Wang'ombe, 2020. "Theoretical perspective of corporate governance among state-owned enterprises: a literature review," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 160-179.
    4. Dennys Eduardo Rossetto & Roberto Carlos Bernardes & Felipe Mendes Borini & Cristiane Chaves Gattaz, 2018. "Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1329-1363, June.
    5. Rafael La Porta & Florencio López-de-Silanes, 1999. "The Benefits of Privatization: Evidence from Mexico," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(4), pages 1193-1242.
    6. Aurora Liu Genin & Justin Tan & Juan Song, 2021. "State governance and technological innovation in emerging economies: State-owned enterprise restructuration and institutional logic dissonance in China’s high-speed train sector," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(4), pages 621-645, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arouri, Mohamed & Boubaker, Sabri & Grais, Wafik & Grira, Jocelyn, 2018. "Rationality or politics? The color of black gold money," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 62-76.
    2. O'Toole, Conor M. & Morgenroth, Edgar L.W. & Ha, Thuy T., 2016. "Investment efficiency, state-owned enterprises and privatisation: Evidence from Viet Nam in Transition," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 93-108.
    3. Iannotta, Giuliano & Nocera, Giacomo & Sironi, Andrea, 2013. "The impact of government ownership on bank risk," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 152-176.
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:02a04 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Joyce C. Wang & Jingtao Yi & Xiuping Zhang & Mike W. Peng, 2022. "Pyramidal Ownership and SOE Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(7), pages 1839-1868, November.
    6. Zhao, Ziyi & Zhao, Yuhuan & Lv, Xin & Li, Xiaoping & Zheng, Lu & Fan, Shunan & Zuo, Sumin, 2024. "Environmental regulation and green innovation: Does state ownership matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Alberto Chong & Florencio de, 2003. "The Truth about Privatization in Latin America," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm436, Yale School of Management.
    8. Driffield, Nigel L. & Mickiewicz, Tomasz & Temouri, Yama, 2013. "Institutional reforms, productivity and profitability: From rents to competition?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 583-600.
    9. Okten, Cagla & Arin, K. Peren, 2006. "The Effects of Privatization on Efficiency: How Does Privatization Work?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1537-1556, September.
    10. Mauricio Garrón B. & Carlos Gustavo Machicado & Katherina Capra, 2003. "Privatization in Bolivia: The Impact on Firm Performance," Research Department Publications 3154, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    11. Nandini Gupta, 2001. "Partial Privatization and Firm Performance: Evidence from India," Industrial Organization 0112002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Ye, Dezhu & Deng, Jie & Liu, Yi & Szewczyk, Samuel H. & Chen, Xiao, 2019. "Does board gender diversity increase dividend payouts? Analysis of global evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-26.
    13. Narjess Boubakri & Jean-Claude Cosset & Omrance Guedhami, 2001. "Liberalization, Corporate Governance, and the Performance of Newly Privatized Firms," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 419, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    14. Muniandy, Balachandran & Hillier, John, 2015. "Board independence, investment opportunity set and performance of South African firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(PA), pages 108-124.
    15. Xu, Shulin & Chen, Shuoqi & Jiao, Wenniu & Chen, Mengjie, 2025. "State-owned enterprises shareholders and innovation of private enterprises: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    16. Mr. Alexander Pivovarsky, 2001. "How Does Privatization Work? Ownership Concentration and Enterprise Performance in Ukraine," IMF Working Papers 2001/042, International Monetary Fund.
    17. Allayannis, George & Lel, Ugur & Miller, Darius P., 2012. "The use of foreign currency derivatives, corporate governance, and firm value around the world," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 65-79.
    18. Esther Wanjugu Gitundu & Sifunjo E. Kisaka & Symon Kibet Kiprop & Lawrence Kangogo Kibet, 2016. "The Effects of Ownership and Corporate Governance Reforms on Efficiency of Privatized Companies in Kenya," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 323-331.
    19. Dan CHIRLESAN & Marius Constantin APOSTOAIE, 2012. "Corporate Governance within Financial Institutions: Asset or Liability?," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 45-52.
    20. Kotter, Jason & Lel, Ugur, 2011. "Friends or foes? Target selection decisions of sovereign wealth funds and their consequences," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 360-381, August.
    21. Hailemariam, Stifanos & Eije, Henk von & Werf, Jos van der, 2002. "Is there a ´privatization trap´? : the case of the manufacturing industries in Eritrea," Research Report 02A04, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:arasju:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:24-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Profiroiu Alina (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.