IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecopol/1539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Coalition clinch" against the Islamic order: the dynamics of market institutions dispute resolution in Dagestan

Author

Listed:
  • Varshaver, Evgeniy

    () (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Kruglova, Ekaterina

    () (Lomonosov Moscow State University)

Abstract

In the article on the example of Dagestan shows how two social order, "the coalition clinch" and the Islamic order, coexisting in the same area, competing with each other. This is demonstrated by the institutions of dispute resolution. Institute of Islamic order, associated with lower transaction costs and a lower level of uncertainty, gradually spread in society, undermining the dominance of inefficient institutions "clinch a coalition." Constraints on diffusion of the new rules are the rules of start-up costs of development, and is currently the practice of the Islamic order are marginal.

Suggested Citation

  • Varshaver, Evgeniy & Kruglova, Ekaterina, 2015. ""Coalition clinch" against the Islamic order: the dynamics of market institutions dispute resolution in Dagestan," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 89-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:1539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://w82.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecopol/1539.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pejovich, Svetozar, 1994. "The Market for Institutions vs. Capitalism by Fiat: The Case of Eastern Europe," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 519-529.
    2. Jan Tinbergen, 1984. "Alternative Optimal Social Orders," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    polijuridism; social order; market institutions Sharia;

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
    • O17 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecopol:1539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (RANEPA maintainer). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.