IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v6y2014i1p49-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporated Companies’ Tendency to Going Public, the Problems Encountered during going Public and a review toward Resolution of these Problems: the Gaziantep Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Cihangir

Abstract

Public offering is a direct financing method that incorporated companies refer to in order to meet the increasing capital needs. It appears a significant event to us since such a financing method can be used for smaller companies as well as larger ones. It’s the most concrete example is the Emerging Companies Market (ECM) that sets the stage for those companies, incorporated in Istanbul Stock Exchange (ISE) and having the potential to develop and grow, to obtain fund from capital markets. The objective of this study is to investigate the tendency of incorporated companies functioning in the field of production in the province of Gaziantep, which is one of the most important industrial city in Turkey, to going public; the problems encountered by companies that want to go public and to make a general evaluation toward the resolutions of these problems. In the scope of this study, 99 incorporated companies were surveyed, the findings achieved as a result of these evaluations demonstrated that the companies within the scope of study had insufficient information about going public and consequently remained abstained concerning going public.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Cihangir, 2014. "Incorporated Companies’ Tendency to Going Public, the Problems Encountered during going Public and a review toward Resolution of these Problems: the Gaziantep Sample," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 49-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:49-62
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1100/1100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/1100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v6i1.1100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jay R. Ritter & Ivo Welch, 2002. "A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 1795-1828, August.
    2. Thomas Dalziel & Robert E. White & Jonathan D. Arthurs, 2011. "Principal Costs in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 1346-1364, September.
    3. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Shan He & Debarshi K. Nandy, 2010. "The Going-Public Decision and the Product Market," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(5), pages 1855-1908.
    4. Robert Carpenter & Laura Rondi, 2006. "Going Public to Grow? Evidence from a Panel of Italian Firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 387-407, December.
    5. Celikyurt, Ugur & Sevilir, Merih & Shivdasani, Anil, 2010. "Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 345-363, June.
    6. James C. Brau & Patricia A. Ryan & Irv DeGraw, 2006. "Initial Public Offerings: CFO Perceptions," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 41(4), pages 483-511, November.
    7. Marco Pagano & Fabio Panetta & and Luigi Zingales, 1998. "Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 53(1), pages 27-64, February.
    8. Abe de Jong & Carel A. Huijgen & Teye A. Marra & Peter Roosenboom, 2012. "Why Do Firms Go Public? The Role of the Product Market," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1-2), pages 165-192, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martijn J. Assem & Nico L. Sar & Philippe Versijp, 2017. "CEOs and CFOs on IPOs: The Process and Success of Going Public," De Economist, Springer, vol. 165(4), pages 381-410, December.
    2. Jeon, Jin Q. & Lee, Cheolwoo & Nasser, Tareque & Via, M. Tony, 2015. "Multiple lead underwriter IPOs and firm visibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 128-149.
    3. Astudillo, Alfonso & Braun, Matías & Castañeda, Pablo, 2011. "The going public decision and the structure of equity markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1451-1470.
    4. Ying Xiao & Chris Yung, 2015. "Extrapolation Errors in IPOs," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(4), pages 713-751, October.
    5. Helwege, Jean & Packer, Frank, 2009. "Private matters," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 362-383, July.
    6. Xie, Xiaoying, 2010. "Are publicly held firms less efficient? Evidence from the US property-liability insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 1549-1563, July.
    7. Vojislav Maksimovic & Gordon M. Phillips & Liu Yang, 2017. "Do Public Firms Respond to Investment Opportunities More than Private Firms? The Impact of Initial Firm Quality," NBER Working Papers 24104, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Liu, Jia & Lister, Roger & Pang, Dong, 2013. "Corporate evolution following initial public offerings in China: A life-course approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-20.
    9. Signori, Andrea, 2018. "Zero-revenue IPOs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 106-121.
    10. Franck Bancel & Usha R. Mittoo, 2009. "Why Do European Firms Go Public?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 844-884, September.
    11. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & He, Jie, 2011. "IPO waves, product market competition, and the going public decision: Theory and evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 382-412, August.
    12. Franck Bancel & Usha R. Mittoo, 2013. "Survey evidence: what do we know about European and US firms’ motivations for going public?," Chapters, in: Mario Levis & Silvio Vismara (ed.), Handbook of Research on IPOs, chapter 3, pages 57-75, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Troy Pollard, 2016. "Sneaking in the back door? An evaluation of reverse mergers and IPOs," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 305-341, August.
    14. Bernstein, Shai, 2012. "Does Going Public Affect Innovation?," Research Papers 2126, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    15. Yuji Honjo, 2021. "Public or perish? From founding to initial public offering," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1573-1610, August.
    16. Güçbilmez, Ufuk, 2014. "Why do some Chinese technology firms avoid ChiNext and go public in the US?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 179-194.
    17. Boucher, Carène & Kooli, Maher, 2022. "Anatomy of money-losing IPOs," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Kutsuna, Kenji & Smith, Janet Kiholm & Smith, Richard & Yamada, Kazuo, 2016. "Supply-chain spillover effects of IPOs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 150-168.
    19. Maghyereh, Aktham I. & Awartani, Basel, 2018. "The factors influencing the decision to list on Abu Dhabi securities exchange," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 89-103.
    20. Baschieri, Giulia & Carosi, Andrea & Mengoli, Stefano, 2015. "Local IPOs, local delistings, and the firm location premium," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 67-83.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:49-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.