IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v16y2024i3p219-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend-Driven Innovation for RTE Food Market: A Comparison Study Between Consumers from Malaysia and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Nur Hidayah Che Ahmat
  • Wan Rusni Wan Ismail
  • Rafidah Aida Ramli
  • Sri Handajani
  • Anderson Ngelambong

Abstract

The ready-to-eat (RTE) food market is growing worldwide. Nevertheless, a limited study was found where researchers compare consumer behavioral intention toward RTE foods between countries. This study compares consumers in Malaysia and Indonesia regarding their food preferences and behavioral intentions toward RTE foods. Using a quantitative cross-sectional approach, the researchers developed an online survey and distributed the survey link to consumers aged 18 years and above from both countries via social media platforms. The dataset comprised 321 responses from Malaysia and 262 from Indonesia. Based on the analyses, findings reported some similarities and differences in consumer preferences and behavior intention between both countries. The highest percentages of Malaysian respondents were recorded for plant-based, genetically modified, gluten-free, and allergen-free foods. Interestingly, the highest percentage of Indonesian respondents reported for insect-based food than the Malaysians. More Malaysian consumers preferred ethnic foods from different cultures than Indonesians. About the same highest percentages of consumers from both countries preferred cell-cultured meat, 3D printed foods, and vegan foods. For Malaysian samples, attitude and subjective norms significantly influenced their behavior intention toward RTE foods. For Indonesian samples, subjective norms and behavioral control significantly influence consumer behavior intention toward RTE foods. Findings are relevant for food producers and marketers to explore the young consumer market and to identify new products to fulfill the market demand. This study broadens and deepens the current understanding of both countries' RTE food trends and consumer behavioral patterns. Food producers should promote RTE food products by highlighting their benefits through marketing channels.

Suggested Citation

  • Nur Hidayah Che Ahmat & Wan Rusni Wan Ismail & Rafidah Aida Ramli & Sri Handajani & Anderson Ngelambong, 2024. "Trend-Driven Innovation for RTE Food Market: A Comparison Study Between Consumers from Malaysia and Indonesia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 219-228.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:219-228
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.4027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4027/2616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v16i3(I)S.4027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braunsberger, Karin & Wybenga, Hans & Gates, Roger, 2007. "A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 758-764, July.
    2. Jinkyung Choi, 2022. "A Pilot Study on RTE Food Purchasing and Food-Related Behaviors of College Students in an Urbanized Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nunkoo, Robin & Smith, Stephen L.J., 2013. "Political economy of tourism: Trust in government actors, political support, and their determinants," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 120-132.
    2. Samuel L. Perry, 2014. "Conservative Christians and Support for Transracial Adoption as an Alternative to Abortion," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(2), pages 380-392, June.
    3. Tachizawa, Elcio M. & Gimenez, Cristina, 2010. "Supply flexibility strategies in Spanish firms: Results from a survey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 214-224, March.
    4. Soundararajan,Vidhya & Soubeiga,Sidiki & Newhouse,David Locke & Palacios-Lopez,Amparo & Pape,Utz Johann & Weber,Michael, 2023. "How Well Do Internet-Based Surveys Track Labor Market Indicators in Middle-IncomeCountries ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10359, The World Bank.
    5. Stefania Capecchi & Romina Gambacorta & Rosaria Simone & Domenico Piccolo, 2024. "Modelling cognitive response patterns to survey questions using the class of CUB models," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 885, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    6. Magdalena Smyk & Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2021. "A Cautionary Note on the Reliability of the Online Survey Data: The Case of Wage Indicator," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 429-464, February.
    7. Schoefer, Klaus & Wäppling, Anders & Heirati, Nima & Blut, Markus, 2019. "The moderating effect of cultural value orientations on behavioral responses to dissatisfactory service experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 247-256.
    8. Raphaëlle Butori & Béatrice Parguel, 2010. "When students give biased responses to researchers: An exploration of traditional paper vs. computerized self-administration," Post-Print halshs-00636231, HAL.
    9. Hung, Kam & Law, Rob, 2011. "An overview of Internet-based surveys in hospitality and tourism journals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 717-724.
    10. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2022. "When It Comes to Screen Golf and Baseball, What Do Participants Think?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Verhagen, T., 2008. "Investigating the impact of C2C electronic marketplace quality on trust," Serie Research Memoranda 0008, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    12. Casper Ferm, Lars-Erik & Thaichon, Park, 2021. "Customer pre-participatory social media drivers and their influence on attitudinal loyalty within the retail banking industry: A multi-group analysis utilizing social exchange theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    13. Suzanne M. Leland & Dustin C. Read & Michael Wittry, 2015. "Analyzing the Perceived Benefits of LEED-Certified and Energy Star–Certified Buildings in the Realm of Local Economic Development," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 29(4), pages 363-375, November.
    14. Bo-Hyun Seong & Chang-Yu Hong, 2021. "Moderating Effect of Demographic Variables by Analyzing the Motivation and Satisfaction of Visitors to the Former Presidential Vacation Villa: Case Study of Cheongnam-Dae, South Korea," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Cauane Blumenberg & Aluísio J. D. Barros, 2018. "Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(6), pages 765-773, July.
    16. Smith, Scott M. & Roster, Catherine A. & Golden, Linda L. & Albaum, Gerald S., 2016. "A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3139-3148.
    17. Antonio Dottore & Suleiman K. Kassicieh, 2017. "Predicting Future Technopreneurs Among Inventors," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Daniel HOMOCIANU & Dinu AIRINEI, 2015. "Some Behavioral Considerations on the GPS4GEF Cloud-Based Generator of Evaluation Forms with Automatic Feedback and References to Interactive Support Content," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(3), pages 19-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:219-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.