IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v9y2021i2p12-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intermedia Agenda Setting and Grassroots Collectives: Assessing Global Media’s Influence on Greek News Outlets

Author

Listed:
  • Lambrini Papadopoulou
  • Karolos Kavoulakos
  • Christos Avramidis

Abstract

This study focuses on a variety of grassroots collectives that emerged during the Greek economic crisis and aims to record activists’ own perceptions regarding the way that domestic media reacted after these collectives featured on the front pages of global news outlets. Drawing on 10 in depth interviews with activists participating in five grassroots collectives, this study brings together social movement and communications theoretical frameworks. Interviewees were asked about their perceptions regarding the role that global elite media coverage may have played in the salience of their endeavors in domestic media. Subsequently, we tested their personal testimonies by implementing a time series analysis on three Greek newspapers for a period of seven days before and after a front page publication in global elite media. Findings suggest that there is a big discrepancy between the perceived and the actual impact of global elite media on the agenda of domestic newspapers. To this end, further research should be undertaken to specify the exact characteristics that influence which grassroots collective will gain prominence in the public realm.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambrini Papadopoulou & Karolos Kavoulakos & Christos Avramidis, 2021. "Intermedia Agenda Setting and Grassroots Collectives: Assessing Global Media’s Influence on Greek News Outlets," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 12-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:12-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/5260/5537
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/5260
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 1986. "Agenda = Agenda," Series Históricas 8749, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Jacob Groshek & Megan Clough Groshek, 2013. "Agenda Trending: Reciprocity and the Predictive Capacity of Social Networking Sites in Intermedia Agenda Setting across Topics over Time," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 15-27.
    3. Jacob Groshek & Megan Clough Groshek, 2013. "Agenda Trending: Reciprocity and the Predictive Capacity of Social Networking Sites in Intermedia Agenda Setting across Topics over Time," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(1), pages 15-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:9m3gz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Billard, Thomas J, 2018. "Setting the Transgender Agenda: Intermedia Agenda-Setting in the Digital News Environment," SocArXiv 9m3gz, Center for Open Science.
    3. Mario Haim & Gabriel Weimann & Hans-Bernd Brosius, 2018. "Who sets the cyber agenda? Intermedia agenda-setting online: the case of Edward Snowden’s NSA revelations," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 277-294, September.
    4. Lin, Trisha T. C., 2021. "Socialbot representations on cross media platforms during 2020 Taiwanese Presidential Election," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238037, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Zeyun Li & Sharifah Rohayah Sheikh Dawood, 2016. "World City Network in China: A Network Analysis of Air Transportation Network," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 213-213, October.
    6. Hans-Peter Weikard & Leo Wangler & Andreas Freytag, 2015. "Minimum Participation Rules with Heterogeneous Countries," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(4), pages 711-727, December.
    7. Amanda Wuth & Magdalena Cismaru, 2021. "A Conceptual and Operational Review of the Negative Financial Health Terminology and Constructs," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 1-1, April.
    8. Boettke, Peter, 2010. "The two social philosophies of Ostroms' institutionalism," MPRA Paper 33425, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Grouiez, Pascal, 2013. "Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    10. Dennis A. Rondinelli & James S. McCullough & Ronald W. Johnson, 1989. "Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: a Political‐Economy Framework," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 57-87, January.
    11. Chun-Chu Liu, 2008. "Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(13), pages 1737-1743.
    12. Matthew W. McCarter & Shirli Kopelman & Thomas A. Turk & Candace E. Ybarra, 2012. "Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth: How the tragedy of the anticommons emerges in organizations," Working Papers 12-14, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    13. Struthers, Karen & Strachan, Glenda, 2019. "Attracting women into male-dominated trades: Views of young women in Australia," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19.
    14. Krehbiel, Keith & Diermeier, Daniel, 2001. "Institutionalism as a Methodology," Research Papers 1699, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    15. Eilders, Christiane, 1997. "The impact of editorial content on the political agenda in Germany: Theoretical assumptions and open questions regarding a neglected subject in mass communication research," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: The Public and the Social Movement FS III 97-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Berry, Linda & Hirst, Eric, 1990. "The U.S. DOE least-cost utility planning program," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 15(12), pages 1107-1117.
    17. Keith Dougherty & Brian Pitts & Justin Moeller & Robi Ragan, 2014. "An experimental study of the efficiency of unanimity rule and majority rule," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 359-382, March.
    18. Meredith Baker & Mark Wooden, 1992. "Immigration and Its Impact on the Incidence of Training in Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 25(2), pages 39-53, April.
    19. Rees, Daniel I. & Mocan, H. Naci, 1997. "Labor market conditions and the high school dropout rate: Evidence from New York State," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 103-109, April.
    20. Olessia Koltsova & Oleg Nagornyy, 2019. "Redefining Media Agendas: Topic Problematization in Online Reader Comments," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 145-156.
    21. Brett M. Frischmann & Alain Marciano & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2019. "Retrospectives: Tragedy of the Commons after 50 Years," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 211-228, Fall.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:12-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.