IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i5p98-113.html

Pro-activeness and its effect on the survival of family-owned manufacturing companies in Kigali City, Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Victoire Muhayimana

    (Institut d' Enseignement supérieur de Ruhengeri (INES-Ruhengeri), MUSANZE, RWANDA. P. O. Box 155 Ruhengeri, Rwanda)

  • Raphael Gwahula

    (Senior Lecturer in Finance and Accounting, The Open University of Tanzania(OUT), P. O. Box 23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania)

  • Salvio Marcha

    (ecturer, The Open University of Tanzania (OUT), P. O. Box 23409, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania)

Abstract

The chance of survival of businesses in Rwanda is underprivileged and 82% of them close at an early stage, which negatively affects manufacturing companies, particularly Family-Owned Manufacturing Companies (FOMCs). Although there are other reasons why many FOMCs do not succeed in the next generation, a lack of pro-activeness has surfaced as a critical factor. Thus, the study aimed to assess the effect of pro-activeness on the survival of family-owned manufacturing companies in Kigali City, Rwanda. The study was conducted in Kigali City, from 2017 to 2023; Cochran’s formula was employed to determine a sample size of 384 senior employees picked at random from 77 FOMCs. This study employed Self-administered questionnaires and a quantitative approach. Multiple linear regression analysis was utilized to find out the relationship among variables. IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) SPSS (Software Package for Social Sciences) was employed to analyze data. The findings of this study indicated that pro-activeness had a substantial influence on the survival of family-owned manufacturing companies. The study offers a cogent explanation of the relationship between the longevity of family-owned manufacturing companies and pro-activeness. The study also offers important insights into the smooth and effective execution of pro-activeness for the survival and continuity of family-owned manufacturing enterprises. Moreover, the study findings indicated that combining pro-activeness and training the successors boost the productivity of family-owned companies and make them more competitive in the market, which leads to the long-term survival of FOMFs. The FOMFs that use pro-activeness in their operations survive longer than the ones without it. Key Words: Pro-Activeness; Family-Owned Companies, Survival, and Manufacturing

Suggested Citation

  • Victoire Muhayimana & Raphael Gwahula & Salvio Marcha, 2023. "Pro-activeness and its effect on the survival of family-owned manufacturing companies in Kigali City, Rwanda," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(5), pages 98-113, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:98-113
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2697/1889
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2697
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i5.2697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey G. Covin & Teresa Joyce Covin, 1990. "Competitive Aggressiveness, Environmental Context, and Small Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 14(4), pages 35-50, July.
    2. Andreas Rauch & Johan Wiklund & G.T. Lumpkin & Michael Frese, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 761-787, May.
    3. Yi-Chun Huang & Ying-Jiuan Wong & Min-Li Yang, 2014. "Proactive environmental management and performance by a controlling family," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 210-240, March.
    4. Yi-Chun Huang & Ying-Jiuan Wong & Min-Li Yang, 2014. "Proactive environmental management and performance by a controlling family," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 210-240, March.
    5. Boers, Börje & Ljungkvist, Torbjörn & Brunninge, Olof & Nordqvist, Mattias, 2017. "Going private: A socioemotional wealth perspective on why family controlled companies decide to leave the stock-exchange," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 74-86.
    6. Yi-Chun Huang & Ying-Jiuan Wong & Min-Li Yang, 2014. "Proactive environmental management and performance by a controlling family," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 210-240, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    2. Kofi Mintah Oware & Kingsley Appiah, 2026. "CEO Characteristics, Family-controlled Firms and Employer-support Volunteerism: Evidence from India," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 87-100, January.
    3. Gang Wang & Taiwen Feng & Zhanguo Zhu & Yisa Jiang, 2023. "Enabling green supply chain integration via green entrepreneurial orientation: Does environmental leadership matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 518-530, March.
    4. Torbjörn Ljungkvist & Jim Andersén, 2021. "A taxonomy of ecopreneurship in small manufacturing firms: A multidimensional cluster analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1374-1388, February.
    5. Anca Maria CLIPA & Catalin Ioan CLIPA, 2021. "International Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Case Of Romanian Saas Entrepreneurs," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 43-47, June.
    6. Engelen, Andreas & Kube, Harald & Schmidt, Susanne & Flatten, Tessa Christina, 2014. "Entrepreneurial orientation in turbulent environments: The moderating role of absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1353-1369.
    7. Bradley A. George & Louis Marino, 2011. "The Epistemology of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptual Formation, Modeling, and Operationalization," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 35(5), pages 989-1024, September.
    8. Schneider, Markus & Engelen, Andreas, 2015. "Enemy or friend? The cultural impact of cross-functional behavior on the EO–performance link," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 439-453.
    9. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    10. García-Villaverde, Pedro M. & Rodrigo-Alarcón, Job & Parra-Requena, Gloria & Ruiz-Ortega, María José, 2018. "Technological dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: The heterogeneous effects of social capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 51-64.
    11. Shirokova, Galina V. & Sokolova, Liubov S., 2013. "Exploring the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Russian SMEs: The Role of Institutional Environment," Working Papers 819, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    12. Crespo, Nuno Fernandes & Simões, Vitor Corado & Fontes, Margarida, 2022. "Uncovering the factors behind new ventures’ international performance: Capabilities, alertness and technological turbulence," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 344-359.
    13. Oluwafemi Dele-Ijagbulu & Menisha Moos & Chukuakadibia Eresia-Eke, 2020. "The Relationship Between Environmental Hostility and Entrepreneurial Orientation of Small Businesses," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(2), pages 347-362, July.
    14. Casillas, José C. & Moreno, Ana M. & Barbero, José L., 2011. "Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and environmental dimensions," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 90-100, June.
    15. Paloma Escamilla-Fajardo & Juan Manuel Núñez-Pomar & Ana María Gómez-Tafalla, 2020. "Exploring Environmental and Entrepreneurial Antecedents of Social Performance in Spanish Sports Clubs: A Symmetric and Asymmetric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    17. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    18. Gundula Glowka & Andreas Kallmünzer & Anita Zehrer, 2021. "Enterprise risk management in small and medium family enterprises: the role of family involvement and CEO tenure," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1213-1231, September.
    19. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    20. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:98-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.