IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683.html

Recensements européens : mouvements centrifuges et forces de rappel

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Festy
  • Nathalie Le Bouteillec

Abstract

[fre] En abandonnant la forme traditionnelle du recensement exhaustif périodique au tournant des années 2000, la France et l’Insee participent à un mouvement général en Europe de réforme des modalités de réalisation du recensement de la population, en particulier au cours de la dernière décennie. Certains pays donnent un rôle aux registres de population, d’autres aux sondages, alors que d’autres encore maintiennent une forme classique. S’y ajoute une multiplication des modes de recueil de l’information auprès des individus et des ménages. À cette diversité des modes de collecte au sein de l’espace européen viennent s’ajouter enfin des choix sensiblement différents dans les thèmes abordés au cours des recensements et dans la forme donnée aux interrogations sur ces sujets. . Faut‑il donc abandonner l’espoir d’établir une carte cohérente de la population européenne et de ses principales caractéristiques ? La réponse de l’Union européenne et d’Eurostat consiste à laisser les pays libres du choix de leurs procédures, à condition que celles‑ci respectent un certain nombre de concepts essentiels, afin que des résultats comparables puissent être produits dans les différents pays (règlement du 9 juillet 2008). Cette conciliation entre diversité des modalités et harmonie des résultats s’inscrit dans la perspective ouverte depuis une cinquantaine d’années par l’élaboration de recommandations par les Nations Unies puis la Conférence des statisticiens européens. Le Census Hub inauguré en 2014 en est aujourd’hui la forme aboutie.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Festy & Nathalie Le Bouteillec, 2016. "Recensements européens : mouvements centrifuges et forces de rappel," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 483(1), pages 259-284.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2016.10683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2016.10683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan Black & Gary Gates & Seth Sanders & Lowell Taylor, 2000. "Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 37(2), pages 139-154, May.
    2. Patrick Festy, 2007. "Numbering same-sex couples in censuses and population registers," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(12), pages 339-368.
    3. Jean-Pierre Courson, 1982. "Les ménages n'auront plus de chef," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 149(1), pages 47-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Kolk & Gunnar Andersson, 2020. "Two Decades of Same-Sex Marriage in Sweden: A Demographic Account of Developments in Marriage, Childbearing, and Divorce," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(1), pages 147-169, February.
    2. Carpenter, Christopher S. & Gonzales, Gilbert & McKay, Tara & Sansone, Dario, 2020. "Effects of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Mandate on Health Insurance Coverage for Individuals in Same-Sex Couples," IZA Discussion Papers 13119, IZA Network @ LISER.
    3. Sansone, Dario, 2019. "Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Judith A. Seltzer, 2019. "Family Change and Changing Family Demography," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(2), pages 405-426, April.
    5. Oreffice, Sonia, 2011. "Sexual orientation and household decision making.: Same-sex couples' balance of power and labor supply choices," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 145-158, April.
    6. Patrick Festy, 2007. "Numbering same-sex couples in censuses and population registers," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(12), pages 339-368.
    7. Robin Fisher & Geof Gee & Adam Looney, 2018. "Same-Sex Married Tax Filers After Windsor and Obergefell," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(4), pages 1423-1446, August.
    8. Michael A. Ash & M. V. Lee Badgett, 2006. "Separate And Unequal: The Effect Of Unequal Access To Employment‐Based Health Insurance On Same‐Sex And Unmarried Different‐Sex Couples," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 24(4), pages 582-599, October.
    9. Barton H. Hamilton & Andrés Hincapié & Robert A. Miller & Nicholas W. Papageorge, 2021. "Innovation And Diffusion Of Medical Treatment," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(3), pages 953-1009, August.
    10. Josef Montag, 2015. "What Drives the Gender Gap? An Analysis Using Sexual Orientation," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 577-608, November.
    11. Lisa K. Jepsen & Christopher A. Jepsen, "undated". "An Empirical Analysis of Same-Sex and Opposite-Sex Couples: Do "Likes" Still Like "Likes" in the '90s?," IPR working papers 99-5, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
    12. Alyssa Schneebaum & Nina Schubert, 2017. "Marriage (In)equality: Does the Sexual Orientation Wage Gap Persist Across Marital Status?," Department of Economics Working Papers wuwp254, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
    13. Thierry Laurent & Ferhat Mihoubi, 2012. "Sexual Orientation and Wage Discrimination in France: The Hidden Side of the Rainbow," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 487-527, December.
    14. Rebitzer, James B. & Taylor, Lowell J., 2011. "Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motives: Standard and Behavioral Approaches to Agency and Labor Markets," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 8, pages 701-772, Elsevier.
    15. Liwei Shan & Shihe Fu & Lu Zheng, 2017. "Corporate sexual equality and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9), pages 1812-1826, September.
    16. Christopher S. Carpenter, 2005. "Self-Reported Sexual Orientation and Earnings: Evidence from California," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 58(2), pages 258-273, January.
    17. Michael Martell, 2013. "Do ENDAs End Discrimination for Behaviorally Gay Men?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 147-169, June.
    18. Ernestina Coast & Alex Fanghanel & Eva Lelièvre & Sara Randall, 2016. "Counting the Population or Describing Society? A Comparison of English and Welsh and French Censuses," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 165-188, May.
    19. Christafore, David & Leguizamon, J. Sebastian & Leguizamon, Susane, 2013. "Are black neighborhoods less welcoming to homosexuals than white neighborhoods?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 579-589.
    20. Marco Fonzo & Silvia Cocchio & Matteo Centomo & Tatjana Baldovin & Alessandra Buja & Silvia Majori & Vincenzo Baldo & Chiara Bertoncello, 2021. "Sexual and Gender Minorities and Risk Behaviours among University Students in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-9, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2016_num_483_1_10683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.