IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcbr/v2021y2021i1id261p77-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Players as Prosumers - How Customer Engagement in Game Modding May Benefit Computer Game Market

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Dewalska-Opitek
  • Magdalena Hofman-Kohlmeyer

Abstract

Consumers play extra-role behaviours while actively participating in designing and improving goods and services, thus becoming prosumers. Modding, i.e. game modifications which aim at creating a new or improving experience for the players, is an interesting form of prosumption observed in the game industry. The general purpose of the study is to identify to what extent players are willing to perform game modding, as well as who and how may benefit from this extra-role behaviour. Qualitative research was conducted in the form of focus groups with Polish game players. Results of the conducted research allow identifying benefits for four groups of beneficiaries, i.e., players as mod users (game diversification, better customisation, higher quality of games, more realism of the game, fun and excitement to play a modified or a new game, prolonged games' lifespans), modders as mod creators (creativity, gaining knowledge about how to create a game, social affiliation and pride or career development) game developers (extending games' lifespans, updating, and renewing game, improving the quality of games, the opportunity to reach a wider audience) and intermediaries like cloud gaming platforms which share the benefits with game developers.Implications for Central European audience: The study provides evidence that customers' inclination to prosume may vary and is stimulated by specific drivers in the form of perceived benefits. Thus, the research supports Adam's equity theory. From the managerial perspective, the current study provides useful, actionable guidance on how to encourage players to engage in real prosumtion in virtual worlds. Game producers need to learn about their customers' needs outside of normal exchange processes. Players shall be perceived as an inseparable part of the gaming industry, who deliver an extra value to the market by game modding activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Dewalska-Opitek & Magdalena Hofman-Kohlmeyer, 2021. "Players as Prosumers - How Customer Engagement in Game Modding May Benefit Computer Game Market," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(1), pages 77-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:id:261:p:77-97
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.261.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.261.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cebr.261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Wolf & Shaun McQuitty, 2011. "Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(3), pages 154-170, December.
    2. Rohm, Andrew J. & Swaminathan, Vanitha, 2004. "A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(7), pages 748-757, July.
    3. Marios Koufaris, 2002. "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 205-223, June.
    4. Rajagopal, 2015. "Consumer Value Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Butterfly Effect in Competitive Markets, chapter 5, pages 119-143, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Holbrook, Morris B., 2006. "Consumption experience, customer value, and subjective personal introspection: An illustrative photographic essay," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 714-725, June.
    6. Tung, Vincent Wing Sun & Chen, Po-Ju & Schuckert, Markus, 2017. "Managing customer citizenship behaviour: The moderating roles of employee responsiveness and organizational reassurance," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 23-35.
    7. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat & Anna Dewalska-Opitek & Magdalena Hofman-Kohlmeyer, 2020. "To Mod or Not to Mod—An Empirical Study on Game Modding as Customer Value Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Reema Nofal & Pelin Bayram & Okechukwu Lawrence Emeagwali & Lu’ay Al-Mu’ani, 2022. "The Effect of eWOM Source on Purchase Intention: The Moderation Role of Weak-Tie eWOM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Gordon, Ross & Dibb, Sally & Magee, Christopher & Cooper, Paul & Waitt, Gordon, 2018. "Empirically testing the concept of value-in-behavior and its relevance for social marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 56-67.
    5. Hyeon-Cheol Kim & Zong-Yi Zhu, 2020. "Improving Social Inclusion for People with Physical Disabilities: The Roles of Mobile Social Networking Applications (MSNA) by Disability Support Organizations in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi, 2019. "Exploring the Influence of Consumer Demographics on Online Purchase Benefits," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 8(4), pages 303-316, December.
    7. Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & Previte, Josephine & Zainuddin, Nadia, 2009. "Conceptualising value creation for social change management," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 211-218.
    8. Changsok Yoo & Shinhye Kwon & Hyunsoo Na & Byenghee Chang, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Gamified Smart Tourism Applications: An Integrative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Kim, Youn-Kyung & Lee, Min-Young & Park, Soo-Hee, 2014. "Shopping value orientation: Conceptualization and measurement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2884-2890.
    10. Euehun Lee & Semi Han, 2017. "Mobile service consumption values: an exploratory mixed-method study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 253-264, December.
    11. Erifili Papista & Athanasios Krystallis, 2013. "Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 75-92, June.
    12. Cedric Hsi-Jui Wu & Hung-Jen Li & Chung-Wen Chiu, 2014. "Understanding Consumer Responses to Travel Websites from Online Shopping Value and Flow Experience Perspectives," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(5), pages 1087-1103, October.
    13. Haroon Qasim & Liang Yan & Rui Guo & Amer Saeed & Badar Nadeem Ashraf, 2019. "The Defining Role of Environmental Self-Identity among Consumption Values and Behavioral Intention to Consume Organic Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Lamya Benamar & Christine Balagué & Zeling Zhong, 2020. "Internet of Things devices appropriation process : the Dynamic Interactions Value Appropriation (DIVA) framework," Post-Print hal-02376414, HAL.
    15. Hye Jung Jung & Kyung Wha Oh & HaeJung Maria Kim, 2021. "Country Differences in Determinants of Behavioral Intention towards Sustainable Apparel Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Galalae, Cristina & Kipnis, Eva & Demangeot, Catherine, 2020. "Reassessing positive dispositions for the consumption of products and services with different cultural meanings: A motivational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 160-173.
    17. Hyesun Hwang & Harim Yeo, 2022. "Inconsistency between subjective propensity and practice of sustainable consumption: Impact of the consumers' values‐in‐behavior and social participation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1796-1810, December.
    18. Umair Akram & Peng Hui & Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Chen Yan & Zubair Akram, 2018. "Factors Affecting Online Impulse Buying: Evidence from Chinese Social Commerce Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, January.
    19. Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto & Mussadiq Ali Khan & Myriam Ertz & Haowei Sun, 2022. "Investigating the Role of Ethical Self-Identity and Its Effect on Consumption Values and Intentions to Adopt Green Vehicles among Generation Z," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Shweta Pandey & Deepak Chawla, 2016. "Impact of changing consumer lifestyles and website quality on online satisfaction and loyalty - an emerging market framework," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 50-71.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    benefits; game modding; prosumption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2021:y:2021:i:1:id:261:p:77-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.