IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0343031.html

Research on the mechanism how consumer expected regret affects market access for pirated information products

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Xue
  • Peng Gao
  • Youshi He
  • Zhiwen Li
  • Hanyang Xu

Abstract

In the past, traditional supervision of pirated information products mostly adopted a post incident disposal model. Under the supervision of government departments and the continuous improvement of manufacturer product quality, the gap in quality and user experience between genuine and pirated products is expanding, thereby curbing the spread of pirated products. At present, with the emergence of cloud services, the spread of information products has changed from offline physical transactions to online digital services, and the sales model has changed from a one-time buyout to a subscription system of continuous payment. In this new context, there have been significant changes in the attributes of pirated information products and customer consumption patterns. The utility analysis model of quality preference and law enforcement supervision may not be well adapted in some cases. However, this study introduces regret theory and expected regret parameters to construct an impact analysis model on the market access of pirated information products, which is closer to the behavioral decision-making patterns of consumers in cloud service scenarios. The conclusion of this study indicates that customers’ sensitivity to expected regret directly affects the quality and price decisions of product manufacturers. The expected regret negative effect of pirated products also provides a more scientific basis for piracy regulation. Appropriate expected regret is not only beneficial for increasing legitimate consumer surplus and product manufacturer profits, but also promotes an increase in overall social welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Xue & Peng Gao & Youshi He & Zhiwen Li & Hanyang Xu, 2026. "Research on the mechanism how consumer expected regret affects market access for pirated information products," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343031
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0343031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0343031&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0343031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    2. Atanu Lahiri & Debabrata Dey, 2013. "Effects of Piracy on Quality of Information Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 245-264, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Peng & Ghosh, Bikram & Liu, Yong, 2024. "Marketing strategies in reward-based crowdfunding: The role of demand uncertainties," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 724-744.
    2. Shogo Kurokawa & Nobuo Matsubayashi, 2018. "Price and quality competition with quality positions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 71-81, March.
    3. Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2000. "Market Entry Strategy Under Firm Heterogeneity and Asymmetric Payoffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 313-327, November.
    4. Chan Choi, S., 2017. "Defensive strategy against a private label: Building brand premium for retailer cooperation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 335-339.
    5. T. Tony Ke & Jiwoong Shin & Jungju Yu, 2023. "A Model of Product Portfolio Design: Guiding Consumer Search Through Brand Positioning," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(6), pages 1101-1124, November.
    6. A. Yeşim Orhun & Sriram Venkataraman & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2016. "Impact of Competition on Product Decisions: Movie Choices of Exhibitors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 73-92, January.
    7. Fethke, Gary, 2011. "Welfare effects of subsidizing higher education when access and quality are endogenous," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 45-48, July.
    8. James Fan & Christopher Griffin, 2014. "Optimal Digital Product Maintenance with a Continuous Revenue Stream," Papers 1412.8624, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.
    9. Xing Gao, 2023. "A competitive analysis of software quality investment with technology diversification and security concern," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2691-2712, December.
    10. Yi Qian & Qiang Gong & Yuxin Chen, 2015. "Untangling Searchable and Experiential Quality Responses to Counterfeits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 522-538, July.
    11. Yunchuan Liu & Tony Haitao Cui, 2010. "The Length of Product Line in Distribution Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 474-482, 05-06.
    12. Ajay Kalra & Surendra Rajiv & Kannan Srinivasan, 1998. "Response to Competitive Entry: A Rationale for Delayed Defensive Reaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 380-405.
    13. Delre, Sebastiano A. & Panico, Claudio & Wierenga, Berend, 2017. "Competitive strategies in the motion picture industry: An ABM to study investment decisions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 69-99.
    14. Ralph Siebert, 2015. "Entering New Markets in the Presence of Competition: Price Discrimination versus Cannibalization," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 369-389, June.
    15. Can Sun & Yonghua Ji & Xianjun Geng, 2023. "Which Enemy to Dance with? A New Role of Software Piracy in Influencing Antipiracy Strategies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1711-1727, December.
    16. Ayd{i}n Alptekinou{g}lu & Charles J. Corbett, 2008. "Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 204-217, August.
    17. L. Colombo & L. Lambertini, 2003. "Dynamic Advertising Under Vertical Product Differentiation," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 261-280, November.
    18. Maria Mayorga & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Goker Aydin, 2013. "Assortment and inventory decisions with multiple quality levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 301-331, December.
    19. Zhao, Ming & Dong, Ciwei & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Quality disclosure strategies for small business enterprises in a competitive marketplace," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 218-229.
    20. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Kai, Ming, 2018. "The effect of customer value and power structure on retail supply chain product choice and pricing decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 115-126.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0343031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.