IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0332100.html

Gendered activities: Men farm, women trade, or is it less clear-cut?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Olabisi
  • Michael Ogundipe

Abstract

The study explores gender participation in agricultural value chains, showing how roles are differentiated across genders and regions. The study fills an important gap in the literature which takes gender disparities as uniform and ignores subnational differences in farming and trading activities, with a focus on Africa’s most populous country, Nigeria. We estimated gender differences in participation, and compared welfare outcomes, using a combination of logit regression models, and instrumental variable estimation, that control for unobserved factors in the model. Household consumption expenditure is used as a proxy for welfare in the data, the most recent General Household Survey, covering more than 32,000 individuals. We find that men dominate farming, while women tend to dominate retail and wholesale trade, but with large regional differences that blur these distinctions. Being a woman implies a lower probability of farming, but almost doubles the likelihood of being engaged in wholesale and about triples that of retailing compared to being a man. The regional differences matter. In the southern regions of the country, women are more diversified across farming and trade activities relative to the north. In assessing the impact of the allocation of activities by gender, we show that farming households spend the least, while households with wholesalers have significantly higher expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Olabisi & Michael Ogundipe, 2026. "Gendered activities: Men farm, women trade, or is it less clear-cut?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332100
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0332100&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0332100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.