Author
Abstract
The revision of the new securities law (NSL) represents a market-oriented reform of China’s securities market centred on the registration-based system. On the basis of data from all A-share listed companies in China from 2015 to 2022, this study employs the NSL as a quasinatural experiment and uses the difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the impact of NSL implementation on the effectiveness and efficiency of corporate innovation. The empirical results indicate that the implementation of the NSL has a significant positive effect on both the effectiveness and efficiency of corporate innovation. This conclusion remains robust after supplementary tests, such as changing the regression method, replacing the dependent variables, excluding municipalities directly under the central government, and accounting for the impact of the pandemic, are conducted. The mediation effect analysis reveals that NSL implementation significantly affects corporate innovation by alleviating financing constraints, enhancing firms’ risk-taking capacity, and strengthening corporate governance. Furthermore, the moderation effect analysis indicates that the corporate governance environment influences the effectiveness of the NSL on corporate innovation. In a poor corporate governance environment, the benefits of the NSL may not effectively translate into improved corporate innovation outcomes. This study provides important evidence for advancing capital market reforms and improving corporate governance while emphasizing the policy implications of strengthening legal protections to enhance corporate innovation capabilities.
Suggested Citation
Zhenna Huang, 2025.
"The Effectiveness and efficiency of corporate innovation under strict market regulation: Based on China’s new securities law,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-29, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0326110
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326110
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.