IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating life cycle assessment into supply chain optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Selin Hülagü
  • Wout Dullaert
  • A Sena Eruguz
  • Reinout Heijungs
  • Dirk Inghels

Abstract

Integrating Supply Chain Optimization (SCO) with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is essential for creating supply chains that are both economically efficient and environmentally sustainable. While SCO focuses on optimizing network structures and decisions related to product and service delivery, LCA systematically assesses the environmental impacts across the entire supply chain. The existing literature treats SCO and LCA as separate, sequential steps, often leading to inconsistencies in scope and challenges in data transfer and rescaling. Our research presents a novel Supply Chain Life Cycle Optimization (SCLCO) model that integrates SCO and LCA. Our SCLCO model is based on LCA data structures, incorporates multi-time period, closed-loop SCO decisions (e.g. reverse chain management, inventory control, network design), and is capable of considering the three pillars of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. It includes harmonizing principles, terminology, and notation, thereby bridging the gap between the SCO and LCA communities through a generalized formulation. Computational experiments on a selected SCO model from Operations Research literature validate the SCLCO and demonstrate its effectiveness in providing valuable insights to both SCO and LCA practitioners and researchers. The results emphasize that the simultaneous execution of SCO and LCA in SCLCO minimizes the risk of overlooking decision impacts and facilitates data transfer from existing LCA databases.

Suggested Citation

  • Selin Hülagü & Wout Dullaert & A Sena Eruguz & Reinout Heijungs & Dirk Inghels, 2025. "Integrating life cycle assessment into supply chain optimization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316710
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316710
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316710&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof, J. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2009. "A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 670-682, March.
    2. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    3. Negri, Valentina & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Fajardy, Mathilde & Reiner, David M. & Mac Dowell, Niall & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Life cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    4. Babazadeh, Reza & Razmi, Jafar & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rabbani, Masoud, 2017. "A sustainable second-generation biodiesel supply chain network design problem under risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 258-277.
    5. Louisa Pollok & Sebastian Spierling & Hans-Josef Endres & Ulrike Grote, 2021. "Social Life Cycle Assessments: A Review on Past Development, Advances and Methodological Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Patrik J G Henriksson & Reinout Heijungs & Hai M Dao & Lam T Phan & Geert R de Snoo & Jeroen B Guinée, 2015. "Product Carbon Footprints and Their Uncertainties in Comparative Decision Contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M. & Van Wassenhove, L. N. & Gabel, H. L. & Weaver, P. M., 1996. "An environmental life cycle optimization model for the European pulp and paper industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 615-629, December.
    8. Rizal Taufiq Fauzi & Patrick Lavoie & Luca Sorelli & Mohammad Davoud Heidari & Ben Amor, 2019. "Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Mota, Bruna & Gomes, Maria Isabel & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula, 2018. "Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modeling approach under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 32-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saeedeh Anvari & Metin Turkay, 2017. "The facility location problem from the perspective of triple bottom line accounting of sustainability," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6266-6287, November.
    2. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    3. Blossey, Gregor & Hahn, Gerd J. & Koberstein, Achim, 2022. "Planning pharmaceutical manufacturing networks in the light of uncertain production approval times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Tautenhain, Camila P.S. & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula & Mota, Bruna & Nascimento, Mariá C.V., 2021. "An efficient Lagrangian-based heuristic to solve a multi-objective sustainable supply chain problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 70-90.
    5. Carlos A. Moreno-Camacho & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Anicia Jaegler, 2023. "Sustainable supply chain network design: a study of the Colombian dairy sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 573-599, May.
    6. Becker, Tristan & Wolff, Michael & Linzenich, Anika & Engelmann, Linda & Arning, Katrin & Ziefle, Martina & Walther, Grit, 2024. "An integrated bi-objective optimization model accounting for the social acceptance of renewable fuel production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 354-367.
    7. Daniel José Bernier-Oviedo & Alexandra Eugenia Duarte & Óscar J. Sánchez, 2025. "Evaluation and Design of Supply Chains for Bioenergy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-50, April.
    8. Zoeteman, B.C.J. & Krikke, H.R. & Venselaar, J., 2010. "Handling WEEE waste flows : On the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world," Other publications TiSEM cb6af1f5-e6b7-4cea-953e-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    10. Lida Safari & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Farzad Movahedi Sobhani, 2024. "Resilient and sustainable supply chain design and planning under supply disruption risk using a multi-objective scenario-based robust optimization model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27485-27527, November.
    11. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    12. Xifeng Tang & Jiantao Wu & Rui Li, 2020. "Efficient Allocation of Customers to Facilities in the Multi-Objective Sustainable Location Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Martí, Joana M. Comas & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Seifert, Ralf W., 2015. "Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 129-142.
    14. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan, 2018. "A multi-stage stochastic program for the sustainable design of biofuel supply chain networks under biomass supply uncertainty and disruption risk: A real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 534-567.
    15. Luttiely Santos Oliveira & Ricardo Luiz Machado, 2021. "Application of optimization methods in the closed-loop supply chain: a literature review," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 357-400, February.
    16. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi & Tomczyk, Michał K. & Dekker, Rommert, 2017. "Evaluation of multi-objective optimization approaches for solving green supply chain design problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 168-184.
    17. Aijun Liu & Yan Zhang & Senhao Luo & Jie Miao, 2020. "Dual-Channel Global Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Optimization Based on Random Demand and Recovery Rate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-32, November.
    18. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    19. Sazvar, Zeinab & Sepehri, Mehran, 2020. "An integrated replenishment-recruitment policy in a sustainable retailing system for deteriorating products," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Rudberg, Martin & Waldemarsson, Martin & Lidestam, Helene, 2013. "Strategic perspectives on energy management: A case study in the process industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 487-496.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.