IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5634-d1682244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Optimization and Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Supply Chain Design: Applications in the Dairy Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo Flores-Siguenza

    (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Anahuac Mexico, Huixquilucan 52786, Estado de Mexico, Mexico)

  • Victor Lopez-Sanchez

    (Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad Anahuac Mexico, Huixquilucan 52786, Estado de Mexico, Mexico)

  • Julio Mosquera-Gutierres

    (Statistic Center, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador)

  • Juan Llivisaca-Villazhañay

    (Department of Applied Chemistry and Production Systems, Faculty of Chemical, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador
    Department of Management Science, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Marlon Moscoso-Martínez

    (Faculty of Sciences, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Panamericana Sur km 1 1/2, Riobamba 060106, Ecuador
    Higher School of Engineering and Technology, Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR), Avda. de la Paz 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain)

  • Rodrigo Guamán

    (Department of Applied Chemistry and Production Systems, Faculty of Chemical, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca 010107, Ecuador)

Abstract

The increasing emphasis on integrating sustainability into corporate operations has prompted supply chain managers to incorporate not only economic objectives but also environmental and social considerations into their network designs. This study presents a structured six-stage methodology to develop a fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for the sustainable design of a multi-level, multi-product forward supply chain network. The model incorporates two conflicting objectives: minimizing total network costs and reducing environmental impact. To quantify environmental performance, a comprehensive life cycle assessment is conducted in accordance with the ISO 14040 standard and the ReCiPe 2016 method, focusing on three impact categories: human health, resources, and ecosystems. To address uncertainty in demand and production costs, fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming is employed. The model is validated and applied to a real-world case study of a dairy small-to-medium enterprise in Ecuador. Using the epsilon-constraint method, a Pareto frontier is generated to illustrate the trade-offs between the economic and environmental objectives. This research provides a robust decision-making tool for uncertain environments and advances knowledge on the integration of life cycle assessment with supply chain optimization and network design methodologies for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo Flores-Siguenza & Victor Lopez-Sanchez & Julio Mosquera-Gutierres & Juan Llivisaca-Villazhañay & Marlon Moscoso-Martínez & Rodrigo Guamán, 2025. "Fuzzy Optimization and Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Supply Chain Design: Applications in the Dairy Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5634-:d:1682244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5634/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5634/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    2. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    3. Margolis, Joshua T. & Sullivan, Kelly M. & Mason, Scott J. & Magagnotti, Mariah, 2018. "A multi-objective optimization model for designing resilient supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 174-185.
    4. Marcus Brandenburg & Tobias Rebs, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain management: a modeling perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 213-252, June.
    5. Waltho, Cynthia & Elhedhli, Samir & Gzara, Fatma, 2019. "Green supply chain network design: A review focused on policy adoption and emission quantification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 305-318.
    6. Pablo Flores-Siguenza & Jose Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo & Joaquina Niembro-Garcia, 2023. "Robust Optimization Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Design Integrating LCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Mota, Bruna & Gomes, Maria Isabel & Carvalho, Ana & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula, 2018. "Sustainable supply chains: An integrated modeling approach under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 32-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tautenhain, Camila P.S. & Barbosa-Povoa, Ana Paula & Mota, Bruna & Nascimento, Mariá C.V., 2021. "An efficient Lagrangian-based heuristic to solve a multi-objective sustainable supply chain problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 70-90.
    2. Carlos A. Moreno-Camacho & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres & Anicia Jaegler, 2023. "Sustainable supply chain network design: a study of the Colombian dairy sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 573-599, May.
    3. Becker, Tristan & Wolff, Michael & Linzenich, Anika & Engelmann, Linda & Arning, Katrin & Ziefle, Martina & Walther, Grit, 2024. "An integrated bi-objective optimization model accounting for the social acceptance of renewable fuel production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 354-367.
    4. Chamari Pamoshika Jayarathna & Duzgun Agdas & Les Dawes & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Supply Chain and Logistics: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Sahar Validi & Arijit Bhattacharya & P. J. Byrne, 2020. "Sustainable distribution system design: a two-phase DoE-guided meta-heuristic solution approach for a three-echelon bi-objective AHP-integrated location-routing model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 191-222, July.
    6. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria, 2020. "Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 168-190.
    7. Rohmer, S.U.K. & Gerdessen, J.C. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2019. "Sustainable supply chain design in the food system with dietary considerations: A multi-objective analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1149-1164.
    8. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.
    9. Majid Eskandarpour & Pierre Dejax & Olivier Péton, 2019. "Multi-Directional Local Search for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design," Post-Print hal-02407741, HAL.
    10. Sahar Validi & Arijit Bhattacharya & P. J. Byrne, 2021. "An evaluation of three DoE-guided meta-heuristic-based solution methods for a three-echelon sustainable distribution network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 421-469, January.
    11. Gaigné, C. & Hovelaque, V. & Mechouar, Y., 2020. "Carbon tax and sustainable facility location: The role of production technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    12. Bruna Figueiredo & Rui Borges Lopes & Amaro de Sousa, 2025. "Location–Routing Problems with Sustainability and Resilience Concerns: A Systematic Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Shoufeng Ji & Pengyun Zhao & Tingting Ji, 2023. "A Hybrid Optimization Method for Sustainable and Flexible Design of Supply–Production–Distribution Network in the Physical Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Lukas Messmann & Lars Wietschel & Andrea Thorenz & Axel Tuma, 2023. "Assessing the social dimension in strategic network optimization for a sustainable development: The case of bioethanol production in the EU," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 760-776, June.
    15. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    16. Xifeng Tang & Jiantao Wu & Rui Li, 2020. "Efficient Allocation of Customers to Facilities in the Multi-Objective Sustainable Location Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Qiang Du & Jiajie Zhou, 2022. "Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Sara Al-Haidous & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2019. "Sustainable Liquefied Natural Gas Supply Chain Management: A Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Guo, Yuhan & Yu, Junyu & Allaoui, Hamid & Choudhary, Alok, 2022. "Lateral collaboration with cost-sharing in sustainable supply chain optimisation: A combinatorial framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Weihua Liu & Enze Bai & Liwei Liu & Wanying Wei, 2017. "A Framework of Sustainable Service Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5634-:d:1682244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.