IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v193y2009i3p670-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks

Author

Listed:
  • Quariguasi Frota Neto, J.
  • Walther, G.
  • Bloemhof, J.
  • van Nunen, J.A.E.E.
  • Spengler, T.

Abstract

Recent literature on sustainable logistics networks points to two important questions: (i) How to spot the preferred solution(s) balancing environmental and business concerns? (ii) How to improve the understanding of the trade-offs between these two dimensions? We posit that a visual exploration of the efficient frontier and trade-offs between profitability and environmental impacts are particularly suitable to answer these two questions. The visual representation of the efficient frontier, however, presents two challenges. The first is to obtain a good approximation for such frontier without enumerating all extreme efficient solutions. The second is to obtain a good visual representation of the efficient frontier. We propose a two-phased heuristic to handle these two problems. The algorithm is designed for the multi-objective linear problem with three objectives: minimize costs, cumulative energy demand and waste in a reverse logistics network. We illustrate our approach by designing a complex recycling logistics network in Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof, J. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2009. "A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 670-682, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:670-682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)01030-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pekka Korhonen & Sari Stenfors & Mikko Syrjänen, 2003. "Multiple Objective Approach as an Alternative to Radial Projection in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 305-321, November.
    2. Liu, Y. & Teo, K. L. & Yang, X. Q., 1999. "Approximation methods for non-convex curves," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 125-135, August.
    3. Frota Neto, J. Quariguasi & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & van Heck, E., 2008. "Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 195-208, February.
    4. Fruhwirth, B. & Bukkard, R. E. & Rote, G., 1989. "Approximation of convex curves with application to the bicriterial minimum cost flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 326-338, October.
    5. Moritz Fleischmann & Jo A. E. E. van Nunen & Ben Gräve, 2003. "Integrating Closed-Loop Supply Chains and Spare-Parts Management at IBM," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 44-56, December.
    6. Steuer, Ralph E. & Piercy, Craig A., 2005. "A regression study of the number of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 484-496, April.
    7. Fleischmann, Mortiz & Krikke, Hans Ronald & Dekker, Rommert & Flapper, Simme Douwe P., 2000. "A characterisation of logistics networks for product recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 653-666, December.
    8. Timo Kuosmanen & Mika Kortelainen, 2005. "Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 59-72, October.
    9. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1976. "An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 652-663, February.
    10. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M. & Van Wassenhove, L. N. & Gabel, H. L. & Weaver, P. M., 1996. "An environmental life cycle optimization model for the European pulp and paper industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 615-629, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frota Neto, J. Quariguasi & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & van Heck, E., 2008. "Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 195-208, February.
    2. Dehghanian, Farzad & Mansour, Saeed, 2009. "Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 559-570.
    3. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    4. Michael W. Toffel & Antoinette Stein & Katharine L. Lee, 2008. "Extending Producer Responsibility: An Evaluation Framework for Product Take-Back Policies," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-026, Harvard Business School.
    5. Tavana, Madjid & Ebrahimnejad, Ali & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J. & Mansourzadeh, Seyed Mehdi & Matin, Reza Kazemi, 2018. "A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-89.
    6. Eskandarpour, Majid & Dejax, Pierre & Miemczyk, Joe & Péton, Olivier, 2015. "Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-32.
    7. Zoeteman, B.C.J. & Krikke, H.R. & Venselaar, J., 2010. "Handling WEEE waste flows : On the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world," Other publications TiSEM cb6af1f5-e6b7-4cea-953e-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Saberi, Sara & Cruz, Jose M. & Sarkis, Joseph & Nagurney, Anna, 2018. "A competitive multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carriers and green technology investment option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 934-949.
    9. A.J.D. Lambert & H.M. Boelaarts & M.A.M. Splinter, 2004. "Optimal Recycling System Design: With an Application to Sophisticated Packaging Tools," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(3), pages 273-299, July.
    10. Aksen, Deniz & Aras, Necati & Karaarslan, Ayse Gönül, 2009. "Design and analysis of government subsidized collection systems for incentive-dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 308-327, June.
    11. Genc, Talat S. & Giovanni, Pietro De, 2017. "Trade-in and save: A two-period closed-loop supply chain game with price and technology dependent returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 514-527.
    12. Pietro De Giovanni, 2016. "State- and Control-Dependent Incentives in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Dynamic Returns," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 20-54, March.
    13. De Giovanni, Pietro & Zaccour, Georges, 2014. "A two-period game of a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(1), pages 22-40.
    14. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2016. "Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 41-53.
    15. Ye, Yu-Sen & Ma, Zu-Jun & Dai, Ying, 2016. "The price of anarchy in competitive reverse supply chains with quality-dependent price-only contracts," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 86-107.
    16. Dyckhoff, Harald & Souren, Rainer, 2022. "Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis and production theory for performance evaluation: Framework and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 795-816.
    17. Harris, Irina & Mumford, Christine L. & Naim, Mohamed M., 2014. "A hybrid multi-objective approach to capacitated facility location with flexible store allocation for green logistics modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-22.
    18. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "OR FORUM---The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18, February.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoguang & Zhou, Yanhui, 2015. "Designing a multi-echelon reverse logistics operation and network: A case study of office paper in Beijing," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 58-69.
    20. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2015. "A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 76-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eco-efficiency Sustainable supply chains Closed-loop supply chains Multi-objective programming Optimization;

    JEL classification:

    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:193:y:2009:i:3:p:670-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.