IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Macro tax burden, FDI, and national innovation efficiency: A study on the impact of macro tax burden on national innovation efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobo Shen
  • Pingsheng Dai

Abstract

Based on a panel dataset of 54 countries from 2008 to 2019, this article uses the mediation effect model to examine the relationship between macro tax burden, FDI and innovation efficiency. We find that:(i) the macro tax burden is positively correlated with the innovation efficiency; (ii) there is a non-linear effect of FDI on innovation efficiency conditional on macro tax rate. When the macro tax burden is greater than the critical value (25.28%), it indirectly limits innovation efficiency by hindering FDI inflows. This means that in order to promote innovation efficiency at the national level, the macro tax rate should be maintained at a reasonable level, because that can make the government raise more money to invest in and subsidy the innovation activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobo Shen & Pingsheng Dai, 2024. "Macro tax burden, FDI, and national innovation efficiency: A study on the impact of macro tax burden on national innovation efficiency," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312451
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312451
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312451&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmitry Taubinsky & Alex Rees-Jones, 2018. "Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(4), pages 2462-2496.
    2. Albert G. Z. Hu & Gary H. Jefferson, 2002. "FDI Impact and Spillover: Evidence from China's Electronic and Textile Industries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(8), pages 1063-1076, August.
    3. Cowan, Robin & Jonard, Nicolas, 2004. "Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(8), pages 1557-1575, June.
    4. Chen, Sheng-Syan & Kao, Wei-Chuan & Wang, Yanzhi, 2021. "Tax policy and innovation performance: Evidence from enactment of the alternative simplified credit," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2021. "The Effects of Taxes on Innovation: Theory and Empirical Evidence," NBER Working Papers 29359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Daniel Tzabbar & Jaclyn Margolis, 2017. "Beyond the Startup Stage: The Founding Team’s Human Capital, New Venture’s Stage of Life, Founder–CEO Duality, and Breakthrough Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 857-872, October.
    7. Sabyasachi Tripathi & Evgeniy Kutsenko & Victoria Boos, 2022. "How different patterns of urbanization affect regional innovation? Evidence from Russia," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 213-243, April.
    8. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Savona, Maria, 2017. "No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 510-521.
    9. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Hanel, Petr & Rosa, Julio Miguel, 2011. "Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 217-229, March.
    10. Cheung Kui-yin & Lin, Ping, 2004. "Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 25-44.
    11. Atanassov, Julian & Liu, Xiaoding, 2020. "Can Corporate Income Tax Cuts Stimulate Innovation?," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(5), pages 1415-1465, August.
    12. Atanassov, Julian & Liu, Xiaoding, 2020. "Can Corporate Income Tax Cuts Stimulate Innovation? - ERRATUM," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(5), pages 1755-1755, August.
    13. Chen, Jian & Wang, Lingjun & Li, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Natural resources, urbanization and regional innovation capabilities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Albert Wijeweera & Don Clark, 2006. "Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Time Series Evidence from the US," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 135-143.
    15. Boying Li & Chun‐Ping Chang & Mingbo Zheng, 2021. "Assessment of innovation and foreign direct investment: An investigation of OECD countries," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 392-403, August.
    16. Napolitano, Giovanni, 1991. "Industrial research and sources of innovation: A cross-industry analysis of Italian manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 171-178, April.
    17. Alessandra Canepa & Paul Stoneman, 2008. "Financial constraints to innovation in the UK: evidence from CIS2 and CIS3," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 711-730, October.
    18. Matthew Denes & Gauti B. Eggertsson & Sophia Gilbukh, 2013. "Deficits, Public Debt Dynamics and Tax and Spending Multipliers," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0, pages 133-163, February.
    19. Xu Xu & Alison Watts & Markum Reed, 2019. "Does access to internet promote innovation? A look at the U.S. broadband industry," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 1423-1440, December.
    20. Paul Robson & Charles Akuetteh & Paul Westhead & Mike Wright, 2012. "Innovative opportunity pursuit, human capital and business ownership experience in an emerging region: evidence from Ghana," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 603-625, October.
    21. Hu, Mei-Chih & Mathews, John A., 2005. "National innovative capacity in East Asia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1322-1349, November.
    22. Andrea Ascani & Luisa Gagliardi, 2015. "Inward FDI and local innovative performance. An empirical investigation on Italian provinces," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 35(1), pages 29-47, February.
    23. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    24. Dmitry Erokhin, 2023. "Tax effects on foreign direct investment—Just a rerouting," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(9), pages 2808-2834, September.
    25. Sleuwaegen, Leo & Boiardi, Priscilla, 2014. "Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(9), pages 1508-1522.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qincheng Zhang & Mingzeng Yang, 2023. "Digital Transformation, Top Management Team Heterogeneity, and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from A Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Chen, Wanyi & Jin, Rong, 2023. "Does tax uncertainty affect firm innovation speed?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Knoll, Bodo & Riedel, Nadine & Schwab, Thomas & Todtenhaupt, Maximilian & Voget, Johannes, 2021. "Cross-border effects of R&D tax incentives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    4. Lishi Liu & Shuang Meng & Jiajie Yu, 2022. "Innovation from Spatial Spillovers of FDI and the Threshold Effect of Urbanization: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2022. "Foreign direct investment (FDI): friend or foe of non-innovating firms?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1162-1178, August.
    6. Byun, Seong K. & Oh, Jong-Min & Xia, Han, 2023. "R&D tax credits, technology spillovers, and firms' product convergence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Kamilia Loukil, 2016. "Foreign Direct Investment And Technological Innovation In Developing Countries," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 31-40, September.
    8. He, Lerong & Jiang, Xiaozhen & Fang, Liting, 2023. "Tax policy reform and corporate innovation in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    9. Zhuoya Du & Qian Wang, 2024. "The power of financial support in accelerating digital transformation and corporate innovation in China: evidence from banking and capital markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    10. Huang, Yongjian & Ren, Zhaoyue & Zhang, Hongwei & Wen, Pengxiang & Li, Zhouyang, 2024. "Tax incentives for key employees and corporate innovation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    11. Ascani, Andrea & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Morrison, Andrea, 2020. "Heterogeneous foreign direct investment and local innovation in Italian Provinces," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 388-401.
    12. Fengfei Li & Tse‐Chun Lin, 2022. "Innovative firms’ cash holdings, tax policies, and institutional environments," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(3), pages 869-902, September.
    13. Gundert Hannah & Nicolay Katharina & Steinbrenner Daniela & Wickel Sophia, 2024. "The Tax Attractiveness of EU Locations for Corporate Investments: A Stocktaking of Past Developments and Recent Reforms," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 97-132.
    14. Yawei Qi & Wenxiang Peng & Neal N. Xiong, 2020. "The Effects of Fiscal and Tax Incentives on Regional Innovation Capability: Text Extraction Based on Python," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Jose García‐Quevedo & Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Ester Martínez‐Ros, 2020. "Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2450-2464, September.
    16. Xiaoyang Zhu, 2022. "Corporate tax competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 447-457.
    17. Li, Xibao, 2011. "Sources of External Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Capability in Chinese State-Owned High-Tech Enterprises," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 1240-1248, July.
    18. Yuan, Jin & Liu, Qiren & Zhao, Can & Du, Jierui, 2025. "Export tax rebates, product ranking, and exports of multi-product firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Tuan, Chyau & Ng, Linda F.Y. & Zhao, Bo, 2009. "China's post-economic reform growth: The role of FDI and productivity progress," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 280-293, May.
    20. Kai Zhao & Huahua Huang & Wanshu Wu, 2022. "State-Level Urban Agglomeration and Enterprise Innovation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.