IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The political, psychological, and social correlates of cryptocurrency ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Shane Littrell
  • Casey Klofstad
  • Joseph E Uscinski

Abstract

Cryptocurrency is a digital asset secured by cryptography that has become a popular medium of exchange and investment known for its anonymous transactions, unregulated markets, and volatile prices. Given the popular subculture of traders it has created, and its implications for financial markets and monetary policy, scholars have recently begun to examine the political, psychological, and social characteristics of cryptocurrency investors. A review of the existing literature suggests that cryptocurrency owners may possess higher-than-average levels of nonnormative psychological traits and exhibit a range of non-mainstream political identities. However, this extant literature typically employs small nonrepresentative samples of respondents and examines only a small number of independent variables in each given study. This presents the opportunity for both further testing of previous findings as well as broader exploratory analyses including more expansive descriptive investigations of cryptocurrency owners. To that end, we polled 2,001 American adults in 2022 to examine the associations between cryptocurrency ownership and individual level political, psychological, and social characteristics. Analyses revealed that 30% of our sample have owned some form of cryptocurrency and that these individuals exhibit a diversity of political allegiances and identities. We also found that crypto ownership was associated with belief in conspiracy theories, “dark” personality characteristics (e.g., the “Dark Tetrad” of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism), and more frequent use of alternative and fringe social media platforms. When examining a more comprehensive multivariate model, the variables that most strongly predict cryptocurrency ownership are being male, relying on alternative/fringe social media as one’s primary news source, argumentativeness, and an aversion to authoritarianism. These findings highlight numerous avenues for future research into the people who buy and trade cryptocurrencies and speak to broader global trends in anti-establishment attitudes and nonnormative behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shane Littrell & Casey Klofstad & Joseph E Uscinski, 2024. "The political, psychological, and social correlates of cryptocurrency ownership," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305178
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305178&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marie-Anne Durand & Renata W Yen & James O’Malley & Glyn Elwyn & Julien Mancini, 2020. "Graph literacy matters: Examining the association between graph literacy, health literacy, and numeracy in a Medicaid eligible population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Yu Song & Bo Chen & Xin-Yi Wang, 2023. "Cryptocurrency technology revolution: are Bitcoin prices and terrorist attacks related?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. McClosky, Herbert & Chong, Dennis, 1985. "Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 329-363, July.
    4. Ron Kerr & Sarah Robinson & Martyna Śliwa, 2022. "Organising populism: From symbolic power to symbolic violence," Post-Print hal-04323340, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Casey A. Klofstad & Joseph E. Uscinski & Jennifer M. Connolly & Jonathan P. West, 2019. "What drives people to believe in Zika conspiracy theories?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Gang Kou & Yang Lu, 2025. "FinTech: a literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, December.
    3. Philip E. Tetlock & Gregory Mitchell & L. Jason Anastasopoulos, 2013. "Detecting and Punishing Unconscious Bias," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(1), pages 83-110.
    4. Daeyun Kang & Doojin Ryu & Robert I. Webb, 2025. "Bitcoin as a financial asset: a survey," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Matthew Feinberg & Elisabeth Wehling, 2018. "A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-31, April.
    6. Menghan Zhang & Xue Qi & Xinyan Liu & Ke Zhang, 2024. "Who Leads? Who Follows? Exploring Agenda Setting by Media, Social Bots and Public in the Discussion of the 2022 South Korean Presidential Election," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    7. Song, Yu & Song, Yanqiu & Chang, Shiwei & He, Lele, 2024. "The role of gold in terrorism: Risk aversion or financing source?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Conlon, Thomas & Corbet, Shaen & Oxley, Les, 2024. "The influence of European MiCa regulation on cryptocurrencies," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Mithani, Murad A., 2024. "Nationalistic political rhetoric: measurement and preliminary insights," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2).
    10. Aharon Bizman & Michael Hoffman, 1993. "Expectations, Emotions, and Preferred Responses Regarding the Arab-Israeli Conflict," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 139-159, March.
    11. Daehan Kim & Doojin Ryu & Robert I. Webb, 2024. "Does a higher hashrate strengthen Bitcoin network security?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Daniel Allington & David Hirsh & Louise Katz, 2023. "Antisemitism is predicted by anti-hierarchical aggression, totalitarianism, and belief in malevolent global conspiracies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Lyndal J. Trevena & Carissa Bonner & Yasmina Okan & Ellen Peters & Wolfgang Gaissmaier & Paul K. J. Han & Elissa Ozanne & Danielle Timmermans & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2021. "Current Challenges When Using Numbers in Patient Decision Aids: Advanced Concepts," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(7), pages 834-847, October.
    14. Ronald Peeters & Rene Saran & Ayşe Müge Yüksel, 2016. "Strategic party formation on a circle and Duverger’s Law," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 729-759, October.
    15. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Podder, Jyotirmoy & Shahriar, Abu Zafar M., 2017. "Performance of Microfinance Institutions: Does Government Ideology Matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 1-15.
    16. Laura J. Reeves & Alexandra Bristow, 2024. "Political Organisational Silence and the Ethics of Care: EU Migrant Restaurant Workers in Brexit Britain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(4), pages 825-844, November.
    17. Zhang, Dongcheng & Jiang, Hanchen & Qiang, Maoshan, 2023. "Public attitudes toward hydropower in China: The role of information provision and partisan identification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    18. Munehito Machida & Michio Murakami & Aya Goto, 2022. "Differences in Data Trustworthiness and Risk Perception between Bar Graphs and Pictograms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-9, April.
    19. Roya Derakhshan & Rashedur Chowdhury, 2025. "Experience of Marginalization in Noncooperative Spaces: The Case of Undocumented Migrant Workers in Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(2), pages 231-252, March.
    20. Jörg Faust & Maria Melody Garcia, 2014. "With or Without Force? European Public Opinion on Democracy Promotion," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 861-878, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.