IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gig worker’s perceived algorithmic management, stress appraisal, and destructive deviant behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Linzi Zhang
  • Jie Yang
  • Yiming Zhang
  • Guohu Xu

Abstract

With the advance of data technologies, gig platforms have applied data and algorithms to their management and put more stringent requirements on gig workers through algorithmic management. Gig workers might perform destructive deviant behavior when coping with algorithmic management. It is meaningful to examine how the algorithmic management applied to gig platforms could lead to gig workers’ destructive deviant behavior. Based on the challenge–hindrance framework, we developed a research model and validated it with survey data collected from 423 food delivery riders. We employed multi-level linear regression analysis in data analysis and found that perceived algorithmic management was appraised as both a hindrance and a challenge. As a hindrance, it elicits working/family deviant behavior; as a challenge, it helps reduce working/family deviant behavior. Regulatory focus (a prevention focus vs. a promotion focus) moderates the effect of perceived algorithmic management on stress appraisals (hindrance appraisals vs. challenge appraisals). This study explains algorithmic management’s impact on gig workers’ destructive deviant behavior through the appraisal of algorithmic management as both a challenge and a hindrance. It also provides practical advice to gig platforms, gig workers and policymakers on how to balance the challenge and hindrance roles of algorithmic management in gig work.

Suggested Citation

  • Linzi Zhang & Jie Yang & Yiming Zhang & Guohu Xu, 2023. "Gig worker’s perceived algorithmic management, stress appraisal, and destructive deviant behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294074
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294074&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mihai Andronie & George Lãzãroiu & Roxana ?tefãnescu & Lumini?a Ionescu & Mãdãlina Coco?atu, 2021. "Neuromanagement decision-making and cognitive algorithmic processes in the technological adoption of mobile commerce apps," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(4), pages 1033-1062, December.
    2. Lindsey D. Cameron & Hatim Rahman, 2022. "Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 38-58, January.
    3. Alan Benson & Aaron Sojourner & Akhmed Umyarov, 2020. "Can Reputation Discipline the Gig Economy? Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 1802-1825, May.
    4. Ngai Keung Chan & Lee Humphreys, 2018. "Mediatization of Social Space and the Case of Uber Drivers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 29-38.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:k3hy4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Flexibility in the Gig Economy: Managing Time on Three Online Piecework Platforms," SocArXiv k3hy4, Center for Open Science.
    7. Ngai Keung Chan & Lee Humphreys, 2018. "Mediatization of Social Space and the Case of Uber Drivers," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 29-38.
    8. Joachim Gerich & Christoph Weber, 2020. "The Ambivalent Appraisal of Job Demands and the Moderating Role of Job Control and Social Support for Burnout and Job Satisfaction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 251-280, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tóth, Zsófia & Nemkova, Ekaterina & Hizsák, Gábor & Naudé, Peter, 2022. "Social capital creation on professional sharing economy platforms: The problems of rating dependency and the non-transferability of social capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 450-460.
    2. Gilles Paché, 2020. "Inside Delivery Platforms: The Covid-19 Pandemic And After," Post-Print hal-03041080, HAL.
    3. Svenja Damberg & Ulla A. Saari & Morgane Fritz & Vytaute Dlugoborskyte & Katerina Božič, 2024. "Consumers' purchase behavior of Cradle to Cradle Certified® products—The role of trust and supply chain transparency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8280-8299, December.
    4. Shafiqul Islam & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Noor-E- Zannat, 2023. "Behavioral Intention to Use Online for Shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    7. Balcerzak, Adam P. & Zinecker, Marek & Skalický, Roman & Rogalska, Elżbieta & Doubravský, Karel, 2023. "Technology-oriented start-ups and valuation: A novel approach based on specific contract terms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Arfive Gandhi & Yudho Giri Sucahyo, 2021. "Architecting an Advanced Maturity Model for Business Processes in the Gig Economy: A Platform-Based Project Standardization," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Ioana Marinescu & Nadav Klein & Andrew Chamberlain & Morgan Smart, 2018. "Incentives Can Reduce Bias in Online Reviews," NBER Working Papers 24372, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Marie Nilsen & Trond Kongsvik & Stian Antonsen, 2022. "Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    12. Zhipeng Zhang & Runna Wang & Lu Shang & Kui Yin & Guangjian Liu & Xianxian Gui, 2025. "Injustice Provokes Psychological Resources Loss: A Dual-Pathway Model of App-worker Reactions to Customers’ Injustice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 713-738, April.
    13. Ping Sun & Julie Yujie Chen & Uma Rani, 2023. "From Flexible Labour to ‘Sticky Labour’: A Tracking Study of Workers in the Food-Delivery Platform Economy of China," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(2), pages 412-431, April.
    14. Veen, Alex & Meijerink, Jeroen & Barratt, Tom & Keegan, Anne & Goods, Caleb, 2025. "Overcoming legitimacy challenges of novel HRM practices during internationalization: The case of two food-delivery platforms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(2).
    15. Pop, Rebeka-Anna & Hlédik, Erika & Dabija, Dan-Cristian, 2023. "Predicting consumers' purchase intention through fast fashion mobile apps: The mediating role of attitude and the moderating role of COVID-19," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    16. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    17. Ruiner, Caroline & Klumpp, Matthias, 2020. "Arbeitskräfte zwischen Autonomie und Kontrolle - Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf Arbeitsbeziehungen in der Logistik [Workforce between Autonomy and Control - Effects of Digitalization on Empl," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(2), pages 141-159.
    18. Mourelatos, Evangelos, 2023. "Does Mood affect Sexual and Gender Discrimination in Hiring Choices? Evidence from Online Experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    19. Trautwein, Yannik & Zechiel, Felix & Coussement, Kristof & Meire, Matthijs & Büttgen, Marion, 2025. "Opening the ‘black box’ of HRM algorithmic biases – How hiring practices induce discrimination on freelancing platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    20. Zhangchao & Wei Chien Ng & Yu Qing Soong, 2024. "Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumers’ Well-Being and Purchase Intention. A Case Study on Douyin Platform," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(14), pages 355-370, December.
    21. Maria Hameed Khan & Jannine Williams & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2024. "Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1107-1127, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.